Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Mar 2010 (Tuesday) 02:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

That's not a dirty sensor, THIS is a dirty sensor

 
pixelbasher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,827 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS
     
Mar 23, 2010 02:15 |  #1

18K image 50D.

I knew it was dirty but never shooting a bland sky at F22 I never really noticed until a few months ago. I decided to get a sensorklear pen and give it a go cleaning after blowing a big chunk of crap on it a couple of months ago with a blower from a cleaning kit. You can see the chunks it left at the bottom left, 3 big pieces close together. Those spots and a couple others were actually showing up at normal open aperture settings, so I knew I had to get rid of it ASAP.

Well, the pen finally showed up today after a long delay, so out for a current pre clean sample photo to show what I was up against.......scary! Sorry about the tree in the first shot btw!

Anyhow, It took quite a few attempts to get it to where I am happy enough with it. Shoot/clean/upload to PC/look, and repeat....... I seemed to be doing a bit of spot "moving" as opposed to REmoving. I'd sort out one annoying spot, then I'd find a different one on the other side for example.

Finally I came up with what you see in image 2. I can still see a couple of spots which are on the sensor as (it's the same two spots on 2 different lenses), but I'm not going to worry about them for the time being, I think you will agree it's like night and day!

To be honest, all this gunk on my sensor and it was only one or two I actually ever saw in 99% of photos, but I feel better knowing it's clean LOL! (j/k) .......or near enough to clean anyway :lol:

oh, so much for auto sensor clean, may as well turn it off I reckon :rolleyes:

oh and to those who are scared to clean theirs, just do it, it's no biggie


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,313 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 55
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Mar 23, 2010 02:25 |  #2

Nice!


.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lukeap69
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Near the desert
     
Mar 23, 2010 03:22 |  #3

what a difference.


Arnold
Speedlite / Speedlight / Sunpak 120J Beauty Dish Rig (external link)
Gear
my Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Mar 23, 2010 04:04 |  #4

You've played knifie spoonie before then. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
golf88
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
     
Mar 23, 2010 04:04 |  #5

that WAS such a dirty sensor haha. glad it's nice and clean now :)


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixelbasher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,827 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS
     
Mar 23, 2010 04:35 as a reply to  @ golf88's post |  #6

yep it was absolutely filty. It looks like a cat has walked across it :oops:

I guess my second shot should have been exposed the same, but I think it still speaks for itself.

xarqi wrote in post #9852843 (external link)
You've played knifie spoonie before then. ;)

LOL! Actually I was thinking croc dundee first, but I do love the Simpsons version :lol:


50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozadam
Member
Avatar
32 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 23, 2010 05:08 |  #7

i've never been able to get my sensor as clean as your "after" image, nice work




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keduf
Member
222 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Mar 23, 2010 05:17 as a reply to  @ ozadam's post |  #8

Good job!!


Kerry
My flickr (external link)
5DMKII I 50D I 350D I Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 I Canon 24-105 f/4L IS I Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 I Canon 50 f/1.8 I Canon 70-200 f/4L I Canon 50 f/1.4 I Canon 100 f/2.8 macro I Olympus OM-D E-M10II I Olympus 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R I Olympus 17 f/2.8 I Olympus 9 f/8.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixelbasher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,827 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS
     
Mar 23, 2010 07:34 as a reply to  @ Keduf's post |  #9

ozadam wrote in post #9852978 (external link)
i've never been able to get my sensor as clean as your "after" image, nice work

Cheers, ozadam, There are still some small gerbils I want gone. It was my first time doing this too and it did prob take 8 or so goes to get it to this point. The photo below was after the first clean with the sensorklear pen, better but still not good enough. I couldn't get a clear shot at the sky with all this wispy cloud drifting through, and got a little slice of the house too in the top right. It's actually a nice piece of cloud IMHO!

Thing I have concerns about with this pen is where is all the crap off my sensor gone.....on the pen I assume? see where I am going with this?
How many uses are these things good for before they become a sensor engraver with all the collected crap?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oRGie
Senior Member
398 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Portugal
     
Mar 23, 2010 08:40 as a reply to  @ pixelbasher's post |  #10

You've certainly done well :) as for how long the pen lasts, no idea, but I personely wouldnt like to use any cleaning surface twice. The sensor swabs and pec pad type things seems best, you use the pad once. You wrap it around the swab, saw a good demo somewhere on the net about that system, someone will hopefully post a link :)


oRGie - I am an EOS and the 7D was my idea :cool:
http://www.fluidr.com/​photos/orgie (external link)
EF70-200F4LIS - EF-S15-85IS - EF50 1.8II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Mar 23, 2010 08:49 |  #11

The proper way to clean a sensor (external link)


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Mar 23, 2010 08:53 |  #12

I bought a cheap rubber bulb blower quite a few years ago and gave my 10D sensor a few good puffs.. The blower had some sort of powder in it. The powder blew out and coated my sensor.. The image below is the result..

ALL that dust came off with a couple of swipes of a Sensor Swab moistened with Eclipse fluid.. I've used Swabs and Eclipse ever since.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Mar 23, 2010 09:32 |  #13

pixelbasher wrote in post #9853407 (external link)
Cheers, ozadam, There are still some small gerbils I want gone. It was my first time doing this too and it did prob take 8 or so goes to get it to this point. The photo below was after the first clean with the sensorklear pen, better but still not good enough. I couldn't get a clear shot at the sky with all this wispy cloud drifting through, and got a little slice of the house too in the top right. It's actually a nice piece of cloud IMHO!

Thing I have concerns about with this pen is where is all the crap off my sensor gone.....on the pen I assume? see where I am going with this?
How many uses are these things good for before they become a sensor engraver with all the collected crap?

Pixelbasher,

The manufacturer states that the pen should last for 50 cleanings, but you're right about having the same tool touching the sensor over and over. The cleaning of the tip happens when you twist the cap a couple of times, a graphite pad goes across the pen's tip. It's logical to assume that this pad inside the cap WILL at some point have a buildup of dust, debris and gunk and maybe even a hard particle. Unfortunately there is no way to clean this pad.

Also, when the pen goes through lubricant, I don't see how the graphite can get all of it out of the pen's tip. But even with these shortcomings, we still see the SensorKlear being a great adjunct to wet cleaning. A swab should stay away from the sidewalls by about 1 mm. and then you can come back with the pen (or a static-brush) just along the sensor's edge.

Nicholas
http://www.copperhilli​mages.com/index.php?pr​=galleries (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Mar 23, 2010 10:03 |  #14

I tried that the other day, now all my images come out wavy with no focus. :(


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Mar 23, 2010 10:24 |  #15

Thanks to Nicholas and his "copperhill mehtod"

After my 1dmkIII came back from Canon they were generous in lube. My sensor was splattered with oil.

My first attempts using eclipse and pec pads and nick's applicator the sensor is immaculate. Ridiculously simple method and unbelievably fast.

I purchased a lenspen and I've never used it.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,319 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
That's not a dirty sensor, THIS is a dirty sensor
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1079 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.