TooManyShots wrote in post #9864264
I have never shot a wedding before but read enough to know that it is a lot of work. Also, wedding is a special occasion for 2 persons. You screw up the shot, you may lose a friend too. If you haven't shot any event similar to a wedding, I don't think you should even take up the job.
I was asked to shoot a couple of weddings before I thought I was ready. I politely turned them down. Like you said, I was NOT going to screw up the event of their lifetime (ok, maybe the first of 2 or 3
). I spent the better part of 3-4 years studying wedding photographers work and reading magazines (Rangefinder, Professional Photographer, etc). Only when I KNEW I could deliver a quality product did I offer to do weddings. So far, every bride has been ecstatic about my work. One thing that made me feel good was my last bride saw one of the shots and said, "Ooh, I remember seeing that in the bridal magazine. I was hoping to have a shot like that." I was happy that 1) the bride liked my work and 2) I was able to capture an image of their wedding day that she had hoped she would have. Now, I won't be getting calls from the Trumps to take pictures of their wedding anytime soon, and I'm ok with that. I was, however, asked to do a wedding in Jacksonville, FL. Granted, it is family, but I was asked because of my work that they saw.
Wow, that was a long-winded paragraph. Sorry about that. However, you can see people on Craigslist who think they are wedding photographers simply because they have a camera. They don't care about putting out quality product and it shows. All they want to do is collect the $300 and run. Ten weddings at $300 is $3000. They have a much better shot at booking 10 $300 weddings than 1 $3000 wedding. That's how they justify their existence. They're happy w/ $300 because they can pay for their gear in 1-2 weddings. They don't carry insurance and don't care if their second-hand, thrift shot flash catches fire and burns the church down. It's not their fault the B&G hired them.