Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
Thread started 26 Mar 2010 (Friday) 20:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

0 cent lightbox test

 
TheFrost
Member
120 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Mar 26, 2010 20:05 |  #1

Today I put together a simple lightbox, just made of two envelopes, and 3 sheets a paper, shooting through the top sheet of paper.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2739/4465356989_9e3948ed73_o.jpg

The result is not bad, considering I used the very cheap Tamron 70-300 zoom lens.

Weird thing is, I tried the same shot at 55mm with my 17-55, and had problems gettings the whole front of the lens sharp. I thought the DOF would be roughly the same for the same angle of view?

PS: I know I should have remove the UV filter...



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Mar 26, 2010 20:21 |  #2

I'm not sure what you mean by same angle of view, unless you mean the same size of subject. Since the 70-300 and 17-55 don't have any common focal lengths, the distance to the subject would have to be different to achieve the same subject size within the frame. Since the 17-55 would've had to be closer to the subject to achieve the same subject size within the frame, the DOF would correspondingly decrease.

Nice job on the zero cost lightbox. I've done something similar when taking pictures for eBay listings.


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheFrost
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
120 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Mar 26, 2010 20:27 |  #3

I meant indeed the same subject size. And yes, of course, at 55mm I am much closer, but somewhere in my head I thought I would be, say, at 4 time the distance when shooting with 220mm. That logic is wrong ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Mar 26, 2010 21:57 |  #4

You can use this online tool to calculate the depth of field for any combination of camera body, focal length, aperture, and distance:

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tysonh
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Mar 27, 2010 01:30 |  #5

nice, looks like a success to me!


Canon Rebel XTi, 50mm 1.8, Lensbaby Muse, Lensbaby plastic optic, Lensbaby single glass optic, Lensbaby macro +4 & +10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheFrost
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
120 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Mar 27, 2010 06:30 |  #6

I tried the dof tool, and it is true that the dof is exactly the same, shooting something at say 50cm with 50mm or 200cm with 200mm. Not completely sure if the two give the same image. Anyone ?!

But there is another effect. The distance between the base and the top of the 10cm object at 50cm is about 1cm, where at 200cm this distance is just 0.25cm. Interesting.... (to me at least).

(furthermore, I realized that to create the 55mm shot I was getting very close to minimal focus distance).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

789 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
0 cent lightbox test
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1810 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.