http://cgi.ebay.com …iewItem&item=190383359065![]()
Ah, now to come up with a way to pay for it...
CH_Devin Senior Member More info | Mar 31, 2010 14:48 | #1 http://cgi.ebay.com …iewItem&item=190383359065
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maximus96 Senior Member 561 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Castro Valley, CA More info | Mar 31, 2010 15:25 | #2 thats the average price unless the prices on this went up. my UW code 85L was also $1625 shipped back around christmas time last year Canon 5D III | 17-40L | 24-70L | 70-200L II | 50L | 85L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vitacura Goldmember 1,514 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Tampa Bay, Fl More info | Mar 31, 2010 15:27 | #3 |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Mar 31, 2010 15:31 | #4 Well it is $250.00 less then a brand new one. The UU date code is means it is 4 years old, but if it is sharp and in great condition and you don't mind it has no warranty or box, then its a good deal. Personally I would rather buy a brand new one, but that's me. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 31, 2010 15:42 | #5 Saint728 wrote in post #9908544 The UU date code is means it is 4 years old, but if it is sharp and in great condition and you don't mind it has no warranty or box, then its a good deal. I guess if it's a guarantee that the lens is tack sharp, it'd be well worth it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OWSIU Senior Member 302 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Mar 31, 2010 15:46 | #6 On ebay, a reputable dealer has new ones listed for $1,897.75. With 8% bing cashback it's $1745.93, so $120.93 more for a new one. One trip to Canon pretty much eats up that savings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kolusu Member 88 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Jacksonville, Florida More info | Mar 31, 2010 15:53 | #7 beach camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 31, 2010 16:10 | #8 Well, there is a $64 double ebay bucks reward for my purchase, so the price would be $1561. But then again, a $64 savings wouldn't really be a factor at all for a $1600 purchase... Hopefully the lens is exactly what the seller said it would be so I wouldn't regret it at all.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1032 guests, 112 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||