Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 20:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

focusing problem

 
momoe
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 01, 2010 20:52 |  #1

ok, I have been shooting pics of my kids as test subjects and all the images have the same problem. I have soft focus issues. either the image is slightly out of focus or it is grainy. I have been using a continuous lighting setup and either my shutter speed is to slow or I have to shoot a higher iso. I know brighter lights are an answer but even when I can get 1/250, its just not right. I shoot a canon xsi with either the canon 50mm F/2.8 or my tamron 28-300 xr ld f/3.5-6.3. am I just not getting the focal points right or do you think its a combination of things? in this image, its not so out of focus but it just isnt sharp. what do you suggest?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:07 |  #2

Looking at the pic it looks as if the focus is falling a little behind where your focusing. The ear and tee shirt are more in focus that the nose and eyes. You might want to run a simple focus test to debug the issue a bit. If the focus test shows that the focus is on target, then start looking a technique. I've found that a simple battery test works well as does shooting soup cans if you want to get farther away.

This is how it should look if the focus is correct.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:17 |  #3

do you use manual or auto focus? if auto, how many points do you use?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cp1005
Senior Member
275 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2010
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:26 |  #4

can you give a newbie details on setting this test up? I am guessing that your center point is on the center battery? but at what angle are you shooting the batteries on?
thanks for the help!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:27 |  #5

It's only for autofocus. If it OOF manual focus, that means you missed. When I first get a new body, I start with the center point, run the test, then walk it through the other points to make sure that they are working as well.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:46 |  #6

here is another question kinda on this topic. why is it i can run my shutter speed to like 4000 in manual but when I hit the shutter button to focus, it drops itself bact to 250 or 400?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyndön
Goldmember
2,263 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 222
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:47 |  #7

momoe wrote in post #9916764 (external link)
ok, I have been shooting pics of my kids as test subjects and all the images have the same problem. I have soft focus issues. either the image is slightly out of focus or it is grainy. I have been using a continuous lighting setup and either my shutter speed is to slow or I have to shoot a higher iso. I know brighter lights are an answer but even when I can get 1/250, its just not right. I shoot a canon xsi with either the canon 50mm F/2.8 or my tamron 28-300 xr ld f/3.5-6.3. am I just not getting the focal points right or do you think its a combination of things? in this image, its not so out of focus but it just isnt sharp. what do you suggest?

"not getting the focal points right"
Hmmm... Does that mean you're letting the camera choose the AF point for you? Try choosing your own focus point *the one closest to the eye usually* and focusing, and recomposing slightly if you have to, while keeping the focus locked with the shutter button half-press. This should make sure the focus is where you want it for nice sharp portraits. I find that the camera rarely chooses to focus where I want it to in "full auto" mode.


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:49 |  #8

no, I choose my point. what I meant was, is my placement off or should I try to manual focus




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyndön
Goldmember
2,263 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 222
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Apr 01, 2010 21:55 |  #9

momoe wrote in post #9917051 (external link)
here is another question kinda on this topic. why is it i can run my shutter speed to like 4000 in manual but when I hit the shutter button to focus, it drops itself bact to 250 or 400?

Are you sure you're in full manual "M" mode? It should stay where you put it, unless maybe there's some sort of safety shift turned on. In Tv/Av modes there is a safety shift option, but I didn't think it applied to manual.


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 01, 2010 22:00 |  #10

cp1005 wrote in post #9916941 (external link)
can you give a newbie details on setting this test up?

This is a post I had a while back describing the set up.
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=5463479&p​ostcount=9

THis is the same pic with the focus points highlighted.

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

There is also a good ppt presentation that sony put out that but I haven't found it.

Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 01, 2010 22:16 |  #11

Josh_30 wrote in post #9917107 (external link)
Are you sure you're in full manual "M" mode? It should stay where you put it, unless maybe there's some sort of safety shift turned on. In Tv/Av modes there is a safety shift option, but I didn't think it applied to manual.

yeah, I was on M. I ran it up to see how high it would go but when I hit the shutter to focus, it went to 250 i think. I wonder if I have a setting in the camera set up wrong?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Veemac
Goldmember
2,098 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Arizona, USA
     
Apr 02, 2010 03:10 |  #12

momoe wrote in post #9917200 (external link)
yeah, I was on M. I ran it up to see how high it would go but when I hit the shutter to focus, it went to 250 i think. I wonder if I have a setting in the camera set up wrong?

Assuming that you're using flash (which you obviously are in the photo you posted), 1/250 is your camera's max sync speed.


Mac
-Stuff I Use-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,483 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4579
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 02, 2010 08:45 |  #13

An even better focus target than batteries, which is an ambiguous target for the AF mechanism since it is a curved surface (meter wonders 'do you want the front of the battery in focus, or the edge?!')...

https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9740221&p​ostcount=5


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,483 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4579
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 02, 2010 08:51 |  #14

I just read the EXIF information for that portrait shot, and noted 1/100 was shutter speed and FL = 183mm
...was the camera tripod mounted?
...even with a flash shot, was the ambient light significant enough to register on the sensor (in addition to the faster flash illumination) and therefore blur the crisp edges of the flash illuminated portion of the overall exposure?

Suggested Rule of Thumb would be 1/292 (1/(FL*1.6) for hand holding a lens on APS-C body

[edit] I just reread the OP and it is continuous light, so my first question applies, which the second question is a moot one.
[edit 2] I just noticed in the EXIF that flash was Compulsory Flash, and evidence of on-camera flash can be seen in the subject's eyes. Second question once again is applicable!!!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
qdrummer21
Member
121 posts
Likes: 8
Joined May 2009
Location: Central, NH
     
Apr 02, 2010 09:20 |  #15

I noticed the SS of 1/100 as well with the FL of 183. Your Tamron lens doesn't have the Vibration Compensation feature to stabilize the lens for handheld induced motion. I second the question of whether you were shooting with a tripod or not. If not I would agree with Wilt that you should look at using the standard rule of thumb for handholding at a higher shutter speed. If for some reason you want to stick with the ISO/SS/Aperture you have dialed in you could switch to your 50mm and move closer to your subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,553 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
focusing problem
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2708 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.