I know that it's a divided world with the use of or non use of filters for "protection" but it was interesting to read that Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens
BearDale "I get 'em pregnant" More info | Apr 01, 2010 23:05 | #1 I know that it's a divided world with the use of or non use of filters for "protection" but it was interesting to read that Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Apr 01, 2010 23:11 | #2 You prolly don't want to suck in water, and dirt with a lense that is front vented... You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 01, 2010 23:28 | #3 Wouldn't it still have to suck past the filter thread though? Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Apr 01, 2010 23:29 | #4 Just out of curiosity, where exactly did you see that Canon said this? [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vladimer Senior Member 634 posts Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada More info | Apr 01, 2010 23:40 | #5 blackhawk wrote in post #9917508 You prolly don't want to suck in water, and dirt with a lense that is front vented... OT a little. I thought the L series is suppose to be more weather resistant then the rest of the canon line up.. so... whats with the holes?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Apr 01, 2010 23:51 | #6 Vladimer wrote in post #9917653 OT a little. I thought the L series is suppose to be more weather resistant then the rest of the canon line up.. so... whats with the holes? never knew they vented the lensesThe 16-35L is front vented. A filter completes it's weather sealing. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vladimer Senior Member 634 posts Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada More info | Gotcha, Thanks for the heads up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 02, 2010 06:22 | #8 fotoworx wrote in post #9917484 I know that it's a divided world with the use of or non use of filters for "protection" but it was interesting to read that Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens Well, that's a good example of how to take part of the information and use it to spread misinformation. Canon recommend using such a filter on some lenses, only to complete the weather protection. So that recommendation is only applicable if you're using one of those lenses on a weatherproofed camera. If I knew I was going to be exposing the 16-35mm lens to a hostile environment such as rain, sea spray, car exhaust fumes, etc., I would use a good quality clear or UV filter to protect the front element. I would also consider using a thin-rim circular polarizing filter to cut glare, etc., if the shooting conditions called for it. But in most other cases where the lens is in no imminent danger, I would remove all filters for maximum optical performance, and use the supplied Canon lens hood to reduce flare and help prevent impact damage. Source ANY and ALL UV/protection filters have some degree of negative impact on image quality. Some more than others. With some extremely high-quality multi-coated UV filters – typically very expensive – the IQ impact is so negligible as to be unnoticeable in the finished printed image to most people. Most UV filters exhibit some IQ degradation that can be seen to some degree in the image. Some UV filters can be quite bad. - Source Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 02, 2010 06:59 | #9 hollis_f wrote in post #9918594 Well, that's a good example of how to take part of the information and use it to spread misinformation. Canon recommend using such a filter on some lenses, only to complete the weather protection. So that recommendation is only applicable if you're using one of those lenses on a weatherproofed camera. Well the above is a a good example of YOU spreading misinformation. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Apr 02, 2010 07:28 | #10 I am starting to think that this is a controversial topic. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Apr 02, 2010 07:43 | #11 Not really. Those who don't use filters shouldn't be surprised though when they see splintered sun because of marred front elements. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Apr 02, 2010 07:51 | #12 Nahhh. What makes you think that? Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nightcat Goldmember 4,533 posts Likes: 28 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Apr 02, 2010 07:59 | #13 blackhawk wrote in post #9918872 Not really. Those who don't use filters shouldn't be surprised though when they see splintered sun because of marred front elements. I have 4 damaged or destroyed filters, and not even the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lense elements. Those filters would have been my front elements... filters are also much easier to clean. Well, I have no damaged filters because I don't use them, and I also have "not the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lens elements". I do however have several badly banged up lens hoods. Those hoods would have been my front elements if they weren't attached.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Apr 02, 2010 09:07 | #14 Democrat...Tea Party...Republican You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Apr 02, 2010 09:24 | #15 nightcat wrote in post #9918935 Well, I have no damaged filters because I don't use them, and I also have "not the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lens elements". I do however have several badly banged up lens hoods. Those hoods would have been my front elements if they weren't attached. Bet I could find marring on many of these "undamaged" lens I hear about that are cleaned at least once a week. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2633 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||