Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 01 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 23:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens

 
Bear ­ Dale
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:05 |  #1

I know that it's a divided world with the use of or non use of filters for "protection" but it was interesting to read that Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:11 |  #2

You prolly don't want to suck in water, and dirt with a lense that is front vented...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:28 |  #3

Wouldn't it still have to suck past the filter thread though?


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:29 |  #4

Just out of curiosity, where exactly did you see that Canon said this?


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vladimer
Senior Member
Avatar
634 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:40 |  #5

blackhawk wrote in post #9917508 (external link)
You prolly don't want to suck in water, and dirt with a lense that is front vented...

OT a little. I thought the L series is suppose to be more weather resistant then the rest of the canon line up.. so... whats with the holes? :confused: never knew they vented the lenses




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 01, 2010 23:51 |  #6

Vladimer wrote in post #9917653 (external link)
OT a little. I thought the L series is suppose to be more weather resistant then the rest of the canon line up.. so... whats with the holes? :confused: never knew they vented the lenses

The 16-35L is front vented. A filter completes it's weather sealing.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vladimer
Senior Member
Avatar
634 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Apr 02, 2010 00:28 as a reply to  @ blackhawk's post |  #7

Gotcha, Thanks for the heads up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Apr 02, 2010 06:22 |  #8

fotoworx wrote in post #9917484 (external link)
I know that it's a divided world with the use of or non use of filters for "protection" but it was interesting to read that Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens

Well, that's a good example of how to take part of the information and use it to spread misinformation. Canon recommend using such a filter on some lenses, only to complete the weather protection. So that recommendation is only applicable if you're using one of those lenses on a weatherproofed camera.

Here's what Chuck Westfall, from Canon, says about filters -

If I knew I was going to be exposing the 16-35mm lens to a hostile environment such as rain, sea spray, car exhaust fumes, etc., I would use a good quality clear or UV filter to protect the front element. I would also consider using a thin-rim circular polarizing filter to cut glare, etc., if the shooting conditions called for it. But in most other cases where the lens is in no imminent danger, I would remove all filters for maximum optical performance, and use the supplied Canon lens hood to reduce flare and help prevent impact damage.

Source (external link).

And here's what Erik Allin says -

ANY and ALL UV/protection filters have some degree of negative impact on image quality. Some more than others. With some extremely high-quality multi-coated UV filters – typically very expensive – the IQ impact is so negligible as to be unnoticeable in the finished printed image to most people. Most UV filters exhibit some IQ degradation that can be seen to some degree in the image. Some UV filters can be quite bad.

- Source (external link).


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 02, 2010 06:59 |  #9

hollis_f wrote in post #9918594 (external link)
Well, that's a good example of how to take part of the information and use it to spread misinformation. Canon recommend using such a filter on some lenses, only to complete the weather protection. So that recommendation is only applicable if you're using one of those lenses on a weatherproofed camera.

Well the above is a a good example of YOU spreading misinformation.

Canon USA - Lens Protection/Lens Care 101

http://www.usa.canon.c​om …FLenses101/lens​_care.html (external link)

Consider using a Skylight or UV filter as full-time protection of your lens, shooting your pictures through it and removing it only when you're using another filter for special effect. And of course, don't forget to use your front and rear lens caps!


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Apr 02, 2010 07:28 |  #10

I am starting to think that this is a controversial topic.:)


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 02, 2010 07:43 |  #11

rklepper wrote in post #9918810 (external link)
I am starting to think that this is a controversial topic.:)

Not really. Those who don't use filters shouldn't be surprised though when they see splintered sun because of marred front elements.

I have 4 damaged or destroyed filters, and not even the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lense elements.
Those filters would have been my front elements... filters are also much easier to clean.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 02, 2010 07:51 |  #12

rklepper wrote in post #9918810 (external link)
I am starting to think that this is a controversial topic.:)

Nahhh. What makes you think that? :rolleyes:


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 02, 2010 07:59 |  #13

blackhawk wrote in post #9918872 (external link)
Not really. Those who don't use filters shouldn't be surprised though when they see splintered sun because of marred front elements.

I have 4 damaged or destroyed filters, and not even the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lense elements.
Those filters would have been my front elements... filters are also much easier to clean.

Well, I have no damaged filters because I don't use them, and I also have "not the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lens elements". I do however have several badly banged up lens hoods. Those hoods would have been my front elements if they weren't attached.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 02, 2010 09:07 |  #14

rklepper wrote in post #9918810 (external link)
I am starting to think that this is a controversial topic.:)

Democrat...Tea Party...Republican
Right wing...Moderates...Lef​t wing
Pro Life...Abortion rights
Marriage of gays...'Marriage' is btw. man and woman
Muslim...Christian
Death sentence...anti death sentence
Filters always...use em when you need to...filters never


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 02, 2010 09:24 |  #15

nightcat wrote in post #9918935 (external link)
Well, I have no damaged filters because I don't use them, and I also have "not the slightest bit of damage on any of my front lens elements". I do however have several badly banged up lens hoods. Those hoods would have been my front elements if they weren't attached.

Bet I could find marring on many of these "undamaged" lens I hear about that are cleaned at least once a week.
Funny, I use hoods all the time, and they don't look that bad. Not buying your story 100%...
It's very easy to mar even a hard surface and most common grit found on the floor/ground is hard enough to do this.

There are times when filters need to be removed, but never using them isn't a good solution for many who shoot outside.

No reason to cause needless wear and tear for minimum (or no) results, or to save a few dollars when you've invested thousands already.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,439 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2633 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.