Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 01 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 23:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens

 
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 03, 2010 00:40 |  #16

ben_r_ wrote in post #9917600 (external link)
Just out of curiosity, where exactly did you see that Canon said this?

http://www.usa.canon.c​om …FLenses101/lens​_care.html (external link)


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckckevin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,439 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Bay Area
     
Apr 03, 2010 00:51 |  #17

fotoworx wrote in post #9917595 (external link)
Wouldn't it still have to suck past the filter thread though?

no. Because the threads are so fine that unless you submerge the lens under water at a high pressure for a while, i don't think any water would go past the filter thread. But WAY before that the camera that u use will already be having heavy water damage ;).


Kevin life= learning
500D, Canon 10-22mm, Tamron 17-50mm 2.8, Canon 60 macro, Canon 85mm 1.8, Sigma 8mm 3.5, Sigma 30mm 1.4, Sigma 50-150mm 2.8, Kenko SP300 1.4x, efs extension tubes, 580EX, and lens that i don't like

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 03, 2010 02:15 |  #18

Thanks. I've seen those little holes before and never knew what they were for.


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dwarfcow
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: South Central, Alaska
     
Apr 03, 2010 03:16 |  #19

blackhawk wrote in post #9919348 (external link)
No reason to cause needless wear and tear for minimum (or no) results, or to save a few dollars when you've invested thousands already.

if i invest thousands in a good lens, i want to see that in my images. if i damage my front element, i'll get it replaced, or replace the lens with a newer better one.;)


"Evidently the photo shop at the college I go to is one of the best in the country. They actually have a handful of digital medium format cameras for students to use; Haliburtons, or hasslehoffs, or something like that."
-name withheld to protect dignity.
Toys

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Apr 03, 2010 04:17 |  #20

Hmmmm, 'Consider using a UV....." doesn't really sound like a recommendation, more a suggestion. Certainly not as definite as 'I would remove all filters for maximum optical performance' or 'ANY and ALL UV/protection filters have some degree of negative impact on image quality.'


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 03, 2010 04:44 |  #21

hollis_f wrote in post #9924232 (external link)
Hmmmm, 'Consider using a UV....." doesn't really sound like a recommendation, more a suggestion. Certainly not as definite as 'I would remove all filters for maximum optical performance' or 'ANY and ALL UV/protection filters have some degree of negative impact on image quality.'

Mr Misinformation has revisited the thread. You're selective quoting.........


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 03, 2010 14:00 |  #22

dwarfcow wrote in post #9924122 (external link)
if i invest thousands in a good lens, i want to see that in my images. if i damage my front element, i'll get it replaced, or replace the lens with a newer better one.;)

On short lens (200mm or less) you will not see any degrading other than ghosting with point light sources in rare instances.
Your theory sounds good, but in practice it leaves a mess if you shoot where I do...


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,440 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Canon recommend using a UV/protection filter on their lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2633 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.