(Air) MIA 02/04/2010

When down to the airport for a few minutes and shot some birds. C&C are very welcomed.

#1

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

. . . nice series, with some nice birds !

Rivman wrote in post #9922870
. . . nice series, with some nice birds !

Thank You

Nice to see something different. I was expecting Miami airport not Malta Looks like a very hot day with all the heat shimmering, hopefully we will see some later in the year.

Chris

I got a flashback from my trip there a few years ago. Great trip during the summer, but sooooo hot!

I like the panning shots showing lots of movement.

nice pan on the Leer

Slimsphotos wrote in post #9924641
Nice to see something different. I was expecting Miami airport not Malta Looks like a very hot day with all the heat shimmering, hopefully we will see some later in the year.

Chris

Yeah sorry about that a case where a word means two things. Should have written Malta International Airport. Yes I will try to take some shots later in the year. Thank you for your comment

ogre1231 wrote in post #9924763
I got a flashback from my trip there a few years ago. Great trip during the summer, but sooooo hot!

I like the panning shots showing lots of movement.

Although it was a beautiful day and there was heat shimmering it was not that hot, during summer it will be much more hotter as you have experienced. Thank you for your comment, yeah the little guy was fast lol

Aviation Junkie wrote in post #9924947
nice pan on the Leer

Thank You

Good series, but most look like they could use a bit more sharpening. And this makes little sense to me:

A better choice at the 200mm focal length would have been ISO 200, 1/800, f/8. Or ISO 400, 1/800, f/11.

PhotosGuy wrote in post #9925166
Good series, but most look like they could use a bit more sharpening. And this makes little sense to me: A better choice at the 200mm focal length would have been ISO 200, 1/800, f/8. Or ISO 400, 1/800, f/11.

Thank you for the hint, appreciate it