Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 08 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 12:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

IR film processing

 
waylandcool
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Apr 08, 2010 12:07 |  #1

I bought some IR film over the winter and have been trying to find a place to process it before I shoot it. I haven't been able to find a place in Chicago that will do it so I was wondering if there was a place I could send it to to get it processed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 08, 2010 12:25 |  #2

You're aware of precautions you have to take in handling it, right? IR radiation penetrates the felt lips of the cartridge, so you have to load and unload the camera in complete darkness, being careful to keep the cartridge in its dark cannister at all times as well.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Apr 08, 2010 12:30 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #3

Yes, I read about that and I haven't loaded any film yet. It's still in the boxes right now. I trying to get this figured out before I start.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Apr 08, 2010 12:32 |  #4

IR film is easy to process on your own in regular black and white chemistry. Calumet in Chicago should have everything you need for it. I'm not personally familiar with photo labs there that do B&W processing.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Apr 08, 2010 12:35 as a reply to  @ DrPablo's post |  #5

That's interesting. I processed B&W film in school and it wasn't that hard to do. I'll have to do some research (Google here I come) on that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Apr 09, 2010 05:53 |  #6

RDKirk wrote in post #9957199 (external link)
You're aware of precautions you have to take in handling it, right? IR radiation penetrates the felt lips of the cartridge, so you have to load and unload the camera in complete darkness, being careful to keep the cartridge in its dark cannister at all times as well.

... or you can use a changing bag (if they still make them.)


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Apr 09, 2010 08:36 |  #7

I processed B&W film in school and it wasn't that hard to do. I'll have to do some research (Google here I come) on that.

There's no info paper in the film box?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Apr 09, 2010 10:40 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #8

I haven't opened the box yet. I'll do that over the weekend.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 09, 2010 11:55 |  #9

CannedHeat wrote in post #9962189 (external link)
... or you can use a changing bag (if they still make them.)

Yes, they do. But I found that changing bags tend to leak IR at the sleeves.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Apr 09, 2010 13:23 |  #10

RDKirk wrote in post #9963973 (external link)
Yes, they do. But I found that changing bags tend to leak IR at the sleeves.

Very interesting. I shot IR film for years, and never once detected any fogging. I used the bag in bright sunlight. But I have not shot IR film for a long, long time so perhaps emulsions, sensitivities, wavelengths etc. are different now.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 09, 2010 19:05 |  #11

CannedHeat wrote in post #9964475 (external link)
Very interesting. I shot IR film for years, and never once detected any fogging. I used the bag in bright sunlight. But I have not shot IR film for a long, long time so perhaps emulsions, sensitivities, wavelengths etc. are different now.

Mine was a long time, too, but I did have some issues with IR leakage through the sleeves. Maybe it was because I was much thinner in my younger days.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Apr 09, 2010 22:15 |  #12

Very interesting. I shot IR film for years, and never once detected any fogging.

The lower speed B&W films & color IR Aero Ektachrome I used were OK loaded in the shade. I think it was just the high speed ones that needed to be loaded in darkness.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Apr 09, 2010 23:26 |  #13

PhotosGuy wrote in post #9967233 (external link)
The lower speed B&W films ...

I don't think I was aware there was more than one speed. I always shot with one model - Kodak 5281 or something like that - and assumed that's all there was.

To be honest, I think I prefer the film images over digital IR. I was looking at some old prints the other day and they seem to have a softer, more surreal look to them. If it just wasn't for all that grain. :(


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 10, 2010 08:23 as a reply to  @ Picture North Carolina's post |  #14

I used IR for portraits. It's a distinctly surreal look--skin and the irises of eyes reflect IR intensely. Interestingly, the color of skin or eyes matters only slightly--all eyes and skin reflects IR at about the same level, creating the same light-toned ethereal effect. Since they're already in the "ethereal realm" of fantasy skin tones the softness and grain doesn't much matter for portrait applications.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,958 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
IR film processing
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1605 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.