For those that have done this is there any chance that the tape tears and gets inside the camera or lens? Just kinda curious about the process pertaining to an EF 400mm f/5.6L Lens using a 1.4x TC.
Thanks
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Apr 08, 2010 19:47 | #1 For those that have done this is there any chance that the tape tears and gets inside the camera or lens? Just kinda curious about the process pertaining to an EF 400mm f/5.6L Lens using a 1.4x TC.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
palmor Senior Member More info | Apr 08, 2010 20:02 | #2 Tsmith wrote in post #9959783 For those that have done this is there any chance that the tape tears and gets inside the camera or lens? Just kinda curious about the process pertaining to an EF 400mm f/5.6L Lens using a 1.4x TC. Thanks Sorry don't have an answer but I'll be curious if you get this to work. With my 7d and EF 400mm f/5.6L and a taped 1.4x TC it would try to focus but would just forever to lock if I was lucky at all. It was a Kenko 3000DG Pro. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
That_Fox "In the Witless Protection Program" 1,386 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Southern California More info | Apr 08, 2010 20:03 | #3 Tsmith wrote in post #9959783 For those that have done this is there any chance that the tape tears and gets inside the camera or lens? Just kinda curious about the process pertaining to an EF 400mm f/5.6L Lens using a 1.4x TC. Thanks I used electrical tape when I was taping pins and it never got in the camera or lens. Apparently I've been dubbed Foxy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Apr 08, 2010 20:21 | #4 palmor wrote in post #9959858 Sorry don't have an answer but I'll be curious if you get this to work. With my 7d and EF 400mm f/5.6L and a taped 1.4x TC it would try to focus but would just forever to lock if I was lucky at all. It was a Kenko 3000DG Pro. John Um that is interesting after hearing of users having success with it. That_Fox wrote in post #9959864 I used electrical tape when I was taping pins and it never got in the camera or lens. That was my thinking, to use the 3M stuff. Wasn't sure if it was too thick or not though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2010 05:48 | #5 Tsmith wrote in post #9959950 Um that is interesting after hearing of users having success with it. There's a reason why Canon disable AF with lens combinations with an aperture smaller than f5.6. It's because the AF system needs enough light to work. And, in all but very good light, at f8 or worse, there ain't gonna be enough. With the 20D to 40D the AF system could handle it better than the later models - that may be where you're heard of it working OK. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Apr 09, 2010 06:46 | #6 hollis_f wrote in post #9962180 There's a reason why Canon disable AF with lens combinations with an aperture smaller than f5.6. It's because the AF system needs enough light to work. And, in all but very good light, at f8 or worse, there ain't gonna be enough. With the 20D to 40D the AF system could handle it better than the later models - that may be where you're heard of it working OK. That quite possibly could be the case as it was older postings that indicated success with doing it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Apr 09, 2010 09:28 | #7 Get cheap tamron non reporting 1.4xTC. That will work much better than canon 1.4xTC with taping pins. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2010 10:14 | #8 bobbyz wrote in post #9963028 Get cheap tamron non reporting 1.4xTC. That will work much better than canon 1.4xTC with taping pins. Er, how? In fact I would guess that it would be the other way around, if only tiny bit, as the Canon probably has better light transmission. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mk1Racer Goldmember 1,735 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Flagtown, NJ More info | Apr 09, 2010 10:34 | #9 bobbyz wrote in post #9963028 Get cheap tamron non reporting 1.4xTC. That will work much better than canon 1.4xTC with taping pins. I would think the IQ would suffer w/ a cheap TC. 7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Apr 09, 2010 10:57 | #10 hollis_f wrote in post #9963304 Er, how? In fact I would guess that it would be the other way around, if only tiny bit, as the Canon probably has better light transmission. Cnaon is better quality wise but AF is slow even with taped pins. Cheap tamron works real nice particularly when using with 400mm f5.6. Try it. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Apr 09, 2010 10:59 | #11 Mk1Racer wrote in post #9963426 I would think the IQ would suffer w/ a cheap TC. Surprisingly IQ is quite good with that TC. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Apr 09, 2010 12:43 | #12 Tsmith wrote in post #9959783 For those that have done this is there any chance that the tape tears and gets inside the camera or lens? Just kinda curious about the process pertaining to an EF 400mm f/5.6L Lens using a 1.4x TC. Thanks Shouldn't be a problem...I used the tape trick with a Kenko Teleplus Pro 300DG 1.4x and a 100-400L on my 5D2...focusing at dusk wasn't a problem (this was at 560mm, effective aperture f/8 ):
"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2010 13:00 | #13 bobbyz wrote in post #9963576 Cnaon is better quality wise but AF is slow even with taped pins. Cheap tamron works real nice particularly when using with 400mm f5.6. Try it. I have (well, with a 100-400) and there's no difference both the non-reporting TC and a decent TC with taped pins behave the same - crap. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Apr 09, 2010 15:16 | #14 hollis_f wrote in post #9964322 I have (well, with a 100-400) and there's no difference both the non-reporting TC and a decent TC with taped pins behave the same - crap. You mean with cheap tamron 1.4xTC? Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Maxdave Goldmember More info | It seems Argyle's photo is hardly "crap", a beautiful shot. I have a Kenko Pro DG 1.4X and it gives satisfactory IQ with my 100-400, but does not autofocus. I have ordered a non-reporting Tamron 1.4X specifically for the 100-400, and when it arrives i will report how much IQ suffers compared to using the Kenko Pro (and how much it suffers compared to the lens alone), and also if it autofocuses with my 40D and 50D. 5D3,1D4,S90,6S&Moment Lenses,Hero4Silver,GPS-E2,2x580EX,430EX,90EX,EF16-35L f/4 IS,Samy SYTS24-C 24TS,EF24-105L IS,EF50 f/1.4,EF70-200 f/4L IS,EF300 f/4L IS,EF100-400L I IS,Kenko DGX 1.4X,Canon 2X TC Mk II, RRS&Pro-Media L-Brackets,Manfrotto MHXPRO-3WG & Roller 50,Sirui 306&K-20,Giottos MT-7371&MH-3300,Velbon ElCarmagne 530,CamRanger,Phottix&Canon Remotes,Lowepro Backpack,ThinkTank Retro 20&Modular System,OpTech straps,Lexar/San Disk Cards
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 863 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||