Hey Folks
I have a question regarding stacking Neutral Density Filters... Good or Bad idea? Say I had a 3 stop, 2 stop, and 1 stop... could they be stacked to make a ... (dunno how the math comes out) larger stop filter? Or is this a bad idea?
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 10, 2010 17:35 | #1 Hey Folks Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 10, 2010 17:37 | #2 Also, if I wanted to get some neutral density filters... is it better to get a screw on or some of those holder things? I am mainly concerned with keeping costs relatively low since I would rarely use it. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AWGD8 Goldmember 1,021 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: SE WI More info | Apr 10, 2010 17:44 | #3 Buy a cheap filter first and see if you like the effect.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 10, 2010 18:50 | #4 So you feel it is better to buy the whole holder and filter stuff oppose to just a screw on? Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 10, 2010 19:01 | #5 I once stacked, my mistake, two UV filters and they caused the light to bounce back and forth and halos throughout the pics. Wasn't really a big deal. I was only on top of Haleakala, the dormant volcano in Maui, a thrice in a lifetime experience, at 4 in the morning waiting in freezing temps for sunrise.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermes Goldmember 2,375 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Apr 10, 2010 19:13 | #6 Of course... I do it all the time. If your filters are of reasonable quality then any negative effect on the image will be barely noticeable. Vignetting can be a problem with wide-angle lenses when stacking filters - depends on the individual lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Apr 11, 2010 06:59 | #7 themadman wrote in post #9970522 Hey Folks I have a question regarding stacking Neutral Density Filters... Good or Bad idea? Say I had a 3 stop, 2 stop, and 1 stop... could they be stacked to make a ... (dunno how the math comes out) larger stop filter? Or is this a bad idea? You can stack ND's and GND's...you can also stack combinations such as ND with GND. The light reduction is additive. Combining a 2-stop with a 4-stop will result in a 6-stop light reduction. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
c2thew Goldmember 3,929 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Not enough minerals. More info | Apr 11, 2010 19:09 | #8 I went the cheap route: $24 for the 3 filters + cokin filter Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nduralt Member 126 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Apr 11, 2010 23:30 | #9 I've stacked circular and lee filters before and the only problem I encountered was with the circular filters vignetting occurred with using 2 or more at shorter shots; with the lee's, I found that when reaching the 6+ stop range or any ND filter, you start to encounter a magenta cast on the picture, but is easily fixed in post. Hope this helps. Also make sure you don't trap dust or dirt between the filters as your screwing them together - I did that and was wondering why there was a spot on all my shots that day (spent the next few hours editing out the spot from all the pics). 7D w/BG-E7 || 50D (Naked) || 480EX || Sigma 24-70 || Canon 70-200 2.8 IS || Canon 50 1.4 || Several kit lenses || TC-80N3 || SanDisk Extreme || Lexar Professional || Redrock Micro Cinema Kit || Manfrotto 190XPROB W/804RC2 || Manfrotto 501HDV+525MVB Pro Video Kit with 520BA || (Internet Marketer 1st, Photographer 2nd, Videographer 3rd) SEO Toronto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 12, 2010 01:54 | #10 argyle wrote in post #9972993 You can stack ND's and GND's...you can also stack combinations such as ND with GND. The light reduction is additive. Combining a 2-stop with a 4-stop will result in a 6-stop light reduction. Stay away from threaded GND filters...if you want to use GND filters, go with the square/rectangular type. If you plan on using threaded ND filters, you can stack them without issue (assuming you're using a good quality filter). About the only problem you may have to contend with will be vignetting, but that's dependent upon the focal length that you're using. Very long exposures may cause a magenta cast to the image, however, due to some IR getting through...the color cast can be removed in post. I wouldn't buy crappy filters first to see if you like it. If you do decide to 'upgrade' to a 'better' filter setup later on, you'll be stuck with the crappy filters with (most likely) no way to get rid of them. The Cokin P system is relatively cheap, but I'd use Hitech filters with it instead of the Cokin filters. If it turns out that you don't care for this type of photography, you can always sell the P kit and recoup most of your money. Could you link me the specific holder and filters I would want? I was thinking maybe a lower stop filter (maybe 3 stop or 4 stop?) and a higher stop one (8-10?) Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
genzbenz Senior Member 628 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Cincinnati, OH More info | Before I got a DSLR, I stacked 3 NDs and a Polarizer on my Canon SX10 IS since it would only stop down to f/8 (I was trying to take long exposures of waterfalls). As long as I didn't shoot into the sun, or shoot at the widest angle (vignetting), the pictures came out well. Visit my Facebook Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Apr 12, 2010 08:48 | #12 themadman wrote in post #9978157 Could you link me the specific holder and filters I would want? I was thinking maybe a lower stop filter (maybe 3 stop or 4 stop?) and a higher stop one (8-10?) My widest lenses are 17-40 on my 5D and 10-20 on my 500D. Something like this? http://www.bhphotovideo.com …077__P_Series_Filter.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com …Density_ND_.html#features Stay away from the P-sized holder...too limiting due to the fixed slots and not the best choice for a full frame camera. Look at the larger holders, such as Cokin Z-Pro and the Lee holder (preferably the Lee). I'm not going to go into the whys because there are literally dozens and dozens of threads on this very topic...you'll just have to search them out (plus I'm tired of repeating myself "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 12, 2010 15:43 | #13 argyle wrote in post #9979236 Stay away from the P-sized holder...too limiting due to the fixed slots and not the best choice for a full frame camera. Look at the larger holders, such as Cokin Z-Pro and the Lee holder (preferably the Lee). I'm not going to go into the whys because there are literally dozens and dozens of threads on this very topic...you'll just have to search them out (plus I'm tired of repeating myself ). Hitech filters are very good and moderately priced (either 4x4 or 4x5 sized for the larger holder).Its hard to recommend an ND strength since the proper filter depends on the available amount of light. For waterfalls, you will need to get your shutter speed down to at least the 1/2-second range, and maybe a bit longer. If you assume the Sunny 16 rule, and your ISO is at 100, your shutter speed will be about 1/100-sec. To get a shutter speed of 1/2-sec, you will need six stops of light reduction. You can go smaller than f/16, but then other issues such as diffraction could come into play. You could also stack a polarizer with the ND filter, which will give an additional 1.5 to 2-stops of light reduction (and if you're shooting waterfalls, you should be using a polarizer 99% of the time anyway (better saturation, reflection control, and glare elimination). Stay away from the P size filter, got it. Sorry about the questions because I honestly have no clue when it comes to filter holders and such, I guess I looked at that due to <below> I assuming Cokin P system mean P filter =/ Anyways, thanks for the info! argyle wrote in post #9972993 I wouldn't buy crappy filters first to see if you like it. If you do decide to 'upgrade' to a 'better' filter setup later on, you'll be stuck with the crappy filters with (most likely) no way to get rid of them. The Cokin P system is relatively cheap, but I'd use Hitech filters with it instead of the Cokin filters. If it turns out that you don't care for this type of photography, you can always sell the P kit and recoup most of your money. We should honestly have a sticky for filters and filter holders. There seems to be quite a few systems out there and when searching I wasn't sure which ones would cause vignette problems for certain lenses, which ones were a good deal, etc etc. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Apr 12, 2010 16:37 | #14 So to double check, I would need: Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Apr 12, 2010 17:14 | #15 themadman wrote in post #9981728 So to double check, I would need: http://www.bhphotovideo.com …_Holder_.html#accessories http://www.bhphotovideo.com …m_Z_Pro_Adapter_Ring.html and as for filters, something like this? http://www.bhphotovideo.com …_Holder_.html#accessories Basically, but before buying the Cokin Z-Pro, read through the below link for a comparison between it and the Lee holder. You'd really be much better off spending the additional $15 or so for the Lee kit and getting the 77mm wide angle adapter ring (also Lee). The WA ring is a bit more expensive than others, but it really reduces the amount of vignetting with a UWA on a FF camera. Anyway, that's my recommendation. The final decision is obviously yours... "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2964 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||