Nothing special just a few shots of a girl on a bike.
malla1962 Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Apr 11, 2010 15:04 | #1 |
promocop Member 223 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 11, 2010 15:07 | #2 Very nicely done. In camera or in post?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greallyphotos Hatchling 3 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Dublin , Ireland More info | Really like the first and last ones
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Apr 11, 2010 15:46 | #4 promocop wrote in post #9974789 Very nicely done. In camera or in post? No I converted them in post.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
promocop Member 223 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Any differnce if one shoots in B&W or converts?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Apr 11, 2010 16:53 | #6 promocop wrote in post #9975219 Any differnce if one shoots in B&W or converts? Not sure mate, never shoot in B&W so I get the option to do colour and B&W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Apr 11, 2010 16:56 | #7 promocop wrote in post #9975219 Any differnce if one shoots in B&W or converts? There is no benefit to be gained by shooting BW in the camera. In fact there are lots of reasons not to. The biggest reason is that to shoot bw in camera means you are shooting .jpg instead of raw. Raw allows you a lot more latitude in exposure in case you miss, as well as other benefits. When you convert in photoshop you can use the color channels to better control the gray scale, much more so than a simple desaturation. On this shot for instance if you wanted a darker sky you could control the blue channel making it darker and more dramatic. cs3 and newer are very good at this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illumined "i love you guys" 2,641 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Stafford, VA, USA More info | Apr 11, 2010 17:13 | #8 promocop wrote in post #9975219 Any differnce if one shoots in B&W or converts? It depends on what kind of camera you use. There is no across-the-board standard as in-camera processing varies from model to model just as any other form of processing. gonzogolf wrote in post #9975282 There is no benefit to be gained by shooting BW in the camera. In fact there are lots of reasons not to. The biggest reason is that to shoot bw in camera means you are shooting .jpg instead of raw. Raw allows you a lot more latitude in exposure in case you miss, as well as other benefits. When you convert in photoshop you can use the color channels to better control the gray scale, much more so than a simple desaturation. On this shot for instance if you wanted a darker sky you could control the blue channel making it darker and more dramatic. cs3 and newer are very good at this. This is not true across-the-board; I use an Epson R-D1s for when I feel like getting nostalgic and want to shoot with a rangefinder but keep within the digital workflow. One truly interesting thing about the way this camera does in-camera B&W is that it retains it records the key of the frame in color as well -- all in the same RAW file. Additionally, the way the R-D1s does in-camera B&W is incredibly true to film even in a digital format; all the way to the lumi-grain representing film grain over digital noise. greallyphotos wrote in post #9974915 Really like the first and last ones ![]() Two and three - the reflection in her glasses are a bit distracting Well done ![]() I concur, I can clearly see the reflectors even at this resolution. Damn those aviators! Ravi J.H. | Make an experience out of it - focus and expose manually.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Apr 11, 2010 17:16 | #9 Luminodio wrote in post #9975366 It depends on what kind of camera you use. There is no across-the-board standard as in-camera processing varies from model to model just as any other form of processing. This not true across-the-board; I use an Epson R-D1s for when I feel like getting nostalgic and want to shoot with a rangefinder but keep within the digital workflow. One truly interesting thing about the way this camera does in-camera B&W is that it retains it records the key of the frame in color as well -- all in the same RAW file. Additionally, the way the R-D1s does in-camera B&W is incredibly true to film even in a digital format; all the way to the lumi-grain representing film grain over digital noise. The last part is subjective to the user, but the first thing I pointed out simply proves their is no across-the-board truth to the first thing you said. I concur, I can clearly see the reflectors even at this resolution. Damn those aviators! I agree, the reflections are bad it it was the only way she could keep her eyes open lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illumined "i love you guys" 2,641 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Stafford, VA, USA More info | Apr 11, 2010 17:20 | #10 malla1962 wrote in post #9975384 I agree, the reflections are bad it it was the only way she could keep her eyes open lol. Believe me, I understand. Hahaha. Ravi J.H. | Make an experience out of it - focus and expose manually.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Apr 11, 2010 17:24 | #11 Luminodio wrote in post #9975406 Believe me, I understand. Hahaha. Being a little cynical in critique here but it appears the focus is set on the bike in the first shot. Was this intentional or was the model just out off the focal plane? The composition is great, but I find myself liking the second and third shots above it despite the reflections as a result of this. No I just looked at the original file and it is OOF but not intentional a mistake on my part, I have two more of the same shot but in focus, I need to start wearing my glasses lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illumined "i love you guys" 2,641 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Stafford, VA, USA More info | Apr 11, 2010 17:26 | #12 malla1962 wrote in post #9975431 No I just looked at the original file and it is OOF but not intentional a mistake on my part, I have two more of the same shot but in focus, I need to start wearing my glasses lol. Good move on taking the 'insurance' shots for times like this when the very things that lead to our creativity fail us in the processing phase. Ravi J.H. | Make an experience out of it - focus and expose manually.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FELINEDEBOURGES Senior Member 591 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Huntington Beach, Ca More info | Apr 11, 2010 18:52 | #13 I dig the series, but the first one I bet she won't like as much since she looks much wider in the hips.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
promocop Member 223 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Well now I'm really confused. I have A 5d and like shooting b&w. What to do? So in monochrome mode raw doesn't record even if I'm in. Jpeg+raw Mode?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illumined "i love you guys" 2,641 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Stafford, VA, USA More info | Apr 11, 2010 20:00 | #15 promocop wrote in post #9975943 Well now I'm really confused. I have A 5d and like shooting b&w. What to do? So in monochrome mode raw doesn't record even if I'm in. Jpeg+raw Mode? Do a test shot, upload and find out. I never shot monochrome on the 5D claissic when I had because I didn't even like shooting with the camera in the first place (yes, 5D hate) so I can't give you a definitive answer. Ravi J.H. | Make an experience out of it - focus and expose manually.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1365 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||