Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 13 Apr 2010 (Tuesday) 14:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tripod on the way. Finally pulled the trigger

 
nickelmedia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
162 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Apr 15, 2010 18:57 as a reply to  @ post 10002165 |  #31

Yay it's a tag team finally! The legs are great. I see now how I could use that extra 7" as it would put it real close to my eye with the column down, but I still can't justify the huge cost difference.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gear: Canon 1DX [personal] Nikon D4s [work]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hyt
Member
114 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Apr 15, 2010 22:07 |  #32

robscomputer wrote in post #10002165 (external link)
Guess what I'm saying is it matters to the photographer on the total height of the legs how they use it. I tend to believe that you shouldn't extend the legs more than needed to reduce any vibration, or chance that it will fall over.

You're right in that different people have different priorities. When I use a tripod, I don't even deploy it right away. I first determine the optimum framing, hand held, for the composition I want. Then I set the tripod and ball head up to hold the camera there. For any given shot, the framing I want might be ankle level. It might be eye level. Or any level in between. A general use tripod should cover these situations, while being high quality enough to be stable even at its full extension.

I don't want to bother with a tripod that compromises my photography, unless I need one for a very specific reason such as travel. This goes doubly true if I'm going to shell out the big bucks for a Gitzo. IMO, of course.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nickelmedia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
162 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Apr 27, 2010 19:08 |  #33

hyt wrote in post #10000269 (external link)
I don't think anyone knowledgeable about the importance of a good tripod can ever fault you for choosing to buy a Gitzo. But at 6'5", you almost definitely bought the wrong model, and would be even worse off with a Traveler unless you like to shoot on your knees, or carry a stool around with you all the time (as if schlepping a tripod around wasn't enough of a pain in the rear already). I'm just saying this as an ex-owner of a GT2541, who is 5 inches shorter than you - AND I'm still relatively young and fit. Maybe it'll work out for you, but don't throw the box and tags away until you're sure.

UPDATE: I took your advice. While I would have been mostly happy with my purchase forever, I couldn't help but think how insignificant $130 for 7" more and less neck/back strain over the life of this tripod would be. I'm RMAing this one back to B&H and already purchased the GT2542L.

My initial gripe was that now I couldn't put it in a carry-on bag, but I think I'll survive and if it really becomes a problem, I'll buy a traveler in the years to come.


Gear: Canon 1DX [personal] Nikon D4s [work]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hyt
Member
114 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Apr 28, 2010 16:16 as a reply to  @ nickelmedia's post |  #34

I think you'll be happy with that decision. Let us know how it goes!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeppoy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,305 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2009
     
Jul 07, 2010 21:16 |  #35

i finally got my GT2541 and aesthetically, it's not that special at all, it does bend too when you put some body weight to it. I'll see how much the functionality of this legendary tripod this saturday and will find out if its really worth the $700 I paid for. On the other hand, I have an Induro AB1 with Photoclam 33NS which is pretty sturdy. $1300 vs $300 hmmm very big difference in price but is it a very big difference in performance as well?


No I'm not a photographer, I just shoot with Canon DSLR with those lenses with red thingy...;)

www.digital-xpression.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,963 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Tripod on the way. Finally pulled the trigger
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2880 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.