Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Apr 2010 (Sunday) 11:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Histograms

 
Lee
Senior Member
472 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Apr 18, 2010 11:51 |  #1

Hey all,

Recently I've decided that I really need to take the time to learn how to properly expose pictures from the get go; this brings me to two questions (for now! :) )

1. The histogram -I hear a lot of chatter about people always glancing at the histogram to see how their picture turned out. Can someone enlighten me as to how to read the histogram; what is it supposed to look like when a picture is properly exposed; how to fix it on the spot if it is incorrect (ie. too far to the left or the right). I hear the histogram should be in the middle?

2. When you're taking pictures of a bridge, and the sun is in the general direction of the bridge, how to do you handle this? When I was trying to take some shots I think the sun was throwing off my metering.

Thanks everyone! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Apr 18, 2010 11:59 |  #2

Here's a quick link. It's actually fairly simple, but can lead you astray if you get hung up on the "shape" of you histogram.
http://www.workshopsfo​rphotographers.com …hniques/reading​-histogram (external link)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Apr 18, 2010 12:01 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

1 Mainly the histogram should ideally be in the middle, but it can be either side, so long as it isn't too left (dark) or too right (over exposed)

2 How do you mean throwing off your metering? Was the sun directly in front of you? If so, it shouldn't be, if you are pointing to the part where it was reflecting off the bridge too much, i.e. a metallic part of the bridge, then no you shouldn't do that




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
promocop
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Apr 18, 2010 12:04 as a reply to  @ Scatterbrained's post |  #4

thanks. I found it very useful!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
     
Apr 18, 2010 12:21 |  #5

A_lee wrote in post #10017837 (external link)
Hey all,

Recently I've decided that I really need to take the time to learn how to properly expose pictures from the get go; this brings me to two questions (for now! :) )

1. The histogram -I hear a lot of chatter about people always glancing at the histogram to see how their picture turned out. Can someone enlighten me as to how to read the histogram; what is it supposed to look like when a picture is properly exposed; how to fix it on the spot if it is incorrect (ie. too far to the left or the right). I hear the histogram should be in the middle?

2. When you're taking pictures of a bridge, and the sun is in the general direction of the bridge, how to do you handle this? When I was trying to take some shots I think the sun was throwing off my metering.

Thanks everyone! :D

Histograms display the count of pixels (y-axis) within a defined range of luminances (x-axis). So for the B&W histogram, the camera will display a histogram for the image as if it were a B&W image. If your camera supports RGB histograms, you'll see 3; one for each primary color channel.

If you really want to take advantage of your sensor for ultimate image quality, you DO NOT want your histogram to be bunched in the center! You want to take an exposure that makes the histogram appear as "pushed" as far right as possible, without having the review image blinking in large sections. Then correct this in post processing (assuming you shoot raw). If you shoot JPEG, then this technique is not for you.

If I am imagining your situation correctly (that the bridge is backlighted by the sun), this is a scenario that is very difficult to expose for because the dynamic range of scene is likely beyond the capabilities of the camera sensor. You have to decide which tones are most important to you, highlights, midtones or shadows, and exposure accordingly to get the most detail in that area.

Light meters measure the incoming light and make a calculation for an exposure that will render a "neutral" or "middle" gray tone. The more contrast that a scene has, the less likely the camera will come up with an exposure that captures the image in the way you want the image to be.



Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 18, 2010 23:15 |  #6

As stated above, "Histograms display the count of pixels (y-axis) within a defined range of luminances (x-axis)." So if all the pixels of a scene are within the left and right bounds of the histogram, you have a 'correct histogram'.

Apart from that criteria, you have no 'correct' or 'wrong' histogram. For example, if all the scene is dark tones (black cat in coal mmine), the histogram peak could be near the left edge; if all the scene is light tones (Finnish bride in white wedding gown on a snowy day), the histogram peak could be near the right edge; if all the scene is middle tones (gray dove on a green lawn), the histogram peak could be near the center. All of those are 'correct', none of those is 'wrong'.

Expose to the Right (ETTR) strives to make better use of the 4096 tonal values of the digital image, so that more of the 4096 levels are used to capture darker tonal detail. But...The problem of using Expose to the Right (ETTR) to the first example, is that it overexposes the dark tones and renders them much too bright for their inherent brightness, and they should be corrected back in post processing, to make them appear at their inherent brightness...a black cat in a coal mine should NOT appear to be a light gray cat against light gray rocks, as it incorrectly portrays the scene!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Apr 21, 2010 10:28 |  #7

Apart from that criteria, you have no 'correct' or 'wrong' histogram.

Important point! Shooting highly reflective subjects like cars, I use this to be sure that the bright areas "at the right" are the bright areas I want to keep, & I can measure Incident light in much the same way as hand held meter does it. The result is that some unimportant brights areas will be blown out:
Need an exposure crutch?

And I use manual mode, too. Why?
Post #47


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Apr 21, 2010 12:18 |  #8

Wilt wrote in post #10021182 (external link)
Expose to the Right (ETTR) strives to make better use of the 4096 tonal values of the digital image, so that more of the 4096 levels are used to capture darker tonal detail. But...The problem of using Expose to the Right (ETTR) to the first example, is that it overexposes the dark tones and renders them much too bright for their inherent brightness, and they should be corrected back in post processing, to make them appear at their inherent brightness...a black cat in a coal mine should NOT appear to be a light gray cat against light gray rocks, as it incorrectly portrays the scene!

I agree with this, and this is an important aspect of ETTR that many people forget. The point of ETTR is to pick up as much detail as possible without blowing anything out*. That does NOT mean it is a properly exposed image, just that you've caught as much detail as possible. You then need to adjust the photo so it looks right, with the benefit being that the adjusted photo should look better because you had that extra detail to work with.

*- Some things, like the sun, will blow out anyway, so don't even worry about that.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,331 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Histograms
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2658 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.