now i have been considering an upgrade to either a dell 2408 2410 or at a push the 2711.
i currently have a packard bell maestro 242dx 24", now this is a tn panel and of course before i purchased it i looked at a whole range of others in that price range and this particular panel had much better clarity and tone that just about any other tn panel i looked at.
so i purchased it and calibrated it with my spyder 3
now from a gamut point of view it is pretty much at 100% of srgb and for what it is does look rather good in isolation when calibrated to a usable luminance. but i have zero experience of ips and dont think ive ever seen one
now i have various printers being a canon w6400 imageprograf 24" wideformat, an olmec op800 8x12 roll fed dye sub and an older canon i9950 (i9900 in usa) dye printer.
now i am conscious of the size of the gamuts of these printers and the olmec in particular mimics the srgb profile pretty well in terms of overall size.
and while i have all of the printers profiled, and use the dye-sub the most, i am thinking to myself
how much more could i gain by upgrading my display to improve print accuracy.
but it has crossed my mind - would all these extra bits of colour information that the dell 'u' series can display just go to waste
what im thinking - is that certainly with a srgb space - will both monitors display pretty much identical in terms of colour accuracy and gamma accuracy or is the ips alot more consistent across a range of luminance
and that is pretty much it - can i gain alot by upgrading or am i just going to excess and wasting money for diminishing returns
anybody who was in the same position id like to hear your experiences and results
_______________




