Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Apr 2010 (Monday) 05:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ips lcd convince me please

 
pip ­ boogaloo
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: newcastle upon tyne
     
Apr 19, 2010 05:01 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

now i have been considering an upgrade to either a dell 2408 2410 or at a push the 2711.

i currently have a packard bell maestro 242dx 24", now this is a tn panel and of course before i purchased it i looked at a whole range of others in that price range and this particular panel had much better clarity and tone that just about any other tn panel i looked at.
so i purchased it and calibrated it with my spyder 3
now from a gamut point of view it is pretty much at 100% of srgb and for what it is does look rather good in isolation when calibrated to a usable luminance. but i have zero experience of ips and dont think ive ever seen one

now i have various printers being a canon w6400 imageprograf 24" wideformat, an olmec op800 8x12 roll fed dye sub and an older canon i9950 (i9900 in usa) dye printer.
now i am conscious of the size of the gamuts of these printers and the olmec in particular mimics the srgb profile pretty well in terms of overall size.

and while i have all of the printers profiled, and use the dye-sub the most, i am thinking to myself

how much more could i gain by upgrading my display to improve print accuracy.
but it has crossed my mind - would all these extra bits of colour information that the dell 'u' series can display just go to waste
what im thinking - is that certainly with a srgb space - will both monitors display pretty much identical in terms of colour accuracy and gamma accuracy or is the ips alot more consistent across a range of luminance

and that is pretty much it - can i gain alot by upgrading or am i just going to excess and wasting money for diminishing returns
anybody who was in the same position id like to hear your experiences and results
_______________


'i just ate a Nikonian'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pip ­ boogaloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: newcastle upon tyne
     
Apr 19, 2010 11:27 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

anybody ?


'i just ate a Nikonian'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Apr 19, 2010 11:58 as a reply to  @ pip boogaloo's post |  #3

"Convince me" posts bug the heck out of me...

You're obviously experienced and well informed already. Maybe at this point you should simply ask yourself "Can I afford it?".


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pip ­ boogaloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: newcastle upon tyne
     
Apr 19, 2010 12:31 as a reply to  @ ChasP505's post |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

im sorry it bugs the heck out of you ChasP505 - title amended to remind you not to bother
i must tune into your feelings and sensitivities

while we are at it tell me other things that affect your karma and feelings and i will tip toe around you in future

for the rest of people who got out of the right side of the bed - i am an experienced photographer but
i have no experience of IPS displays so cannot comprehend the differences or benefits and as i said in isolation mine seems good - but not seen an IPS.
yes i can read reviews till the cows come home and have trawled here and found out further info, but not exactly what i was after

to be clear i dont have financial issues - but dont like wasting money either
perhaps if it bugs you then dont contribute to this thread further, thanks


'i just ate a Nikonian'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hopelessdfilms
Member
169 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Apr 19, 2010 13:04 |  #5

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …241W_24_1_Wides​creen.html (external link)

http://www.eizo.com …loredge/cg243w/​index.html (external link)

if you are not worried about price, these are phenomenal screens....

since you are SPECIFICALLY asking about ips panels, the cg243 is the ips panel screen.... it is the updated model from the cg241....

I use the cg 241 all day long everyday.... actually I use 3 of them... but beside the point.

There are plenty of PHENOMENAL pva, sva, xva panels out there that can provide wonderful color accuract, backlight uniformity, viewing angle, etc etc etc that will blow away any tn panel out there.

Tn panels have large shifting just by moving your head a couple of inches in any direction... they also do not generally have very even backlighting, this is not necessarily due to the 'panel' but the manufacturer and its design of how to light the panel.

EIZO screens are pretty much some of the best $ can buy....

I also enjoy the apple cinema displays... which were ips panels.... this is to the previous generation with the matte screen, NOT the overly priced Mirrors that they just released....

Cinema displays are very good screens and can handle calibration verrrry well...

Used cinema displays can be had for a very reasonable price on the craigslist / ebay market...

Eizo's not so much.

BUT! Eizo does come with a 5 year warranty... and is pretty much the best screen that $ can buy... as previously stated.

just my .02




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Apr 19, 2010 13:10 |  #6

IPS or xVA is the only rational choice for a photographer.

Ask yourself if you want to see all your colours as correctly as possible and be able to move your head without the colours altering. If the answer is yes then buy an IPS.

It is pointless calibrating a TN because if you move your head from absolutely dead on then the colours alter. Plus they only display 6bit colour and do that fairly badly.

The difference between IPS and TN is about the same as a print on good quality gloss paper and one on photocopier paper.

Hopelessdfilms wrote in post #10024518 (external link)
Eizo..... pretty much the best screen that $ can buy...

The best you can get is a Quato. But they really are unbelievably expensive, I know, I have one and we use them at work.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Apr 19, 2010 13:29 as a reply to  @ HankScorpio's post |  #7

Hank and Hopeless are talking about monitors many times more expensive than those the OP mentioned for consideration. Is that the level of quality that pip boogaloo needs or wants?

Instead of the Dells mentioned, I'd look at the new NEC PA241w for the most return on your money.

http://www.necvisualsy​stems.com …77-4f55-a29c-ad0fbdf58464 (external link)


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Apr 19, 2010 13:43 |  #8

pip boogaloo wrote in post #10024314 (external link)
im sorry it bugs the hell out of you ChasP505 - title amended to remind you not to bother
i must tune into your feelings and sensitivities

while we are at it tell me other things that affect your karma and your feelings are sensitive too and i will tip toe around you in future

Pay a guy a compliment and get a slap in return. Go figure.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pip ­ boogaloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: newcastle upon tyne
     
Apr 19, 2010 14:02 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

ChasP505 wrote in post #10024132 (external link)
"Convince me" posts bug the heck out of me...

You're obviously experienced and well informed already. Maybe at this point you should simply ask yourself "Can I afford it?".

say what - compliment you say ? was that compliment with the back of your left or right hand ;)
anyway - lets kiss and make up

thanks for the bump
thanks for the viewpoints - very interested in others observations so keep'em coming


'i just ate a Nikonian'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Apr 19, 2010 14:31 |  #10

pip boogaloo wrote in post #10024876 (external link)
say what - compliment you say ? was that compliment with the back of your left or right hand ;)

No... It was more like asking you to "turn your head and cough". :lol:


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Apr 19, 2010 14:39 |  #11

I use the Dell 2410 and find it to be excellent. I upgraded from my old TN (now my 2nd monitor) because "I" was unhappy with its performance.

The short answer to your quation is therefore that the only person that can convince you is you. From your post you know that IPS is better than TN so the issue then becomes subjective - how good do you want it to be? Only you know that answer.

If you are unhappy with the results you are getting then upgrade and you will be impressed. If you are getting what you feel are acceptable quality prints then stick with what you have.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hopelessdfilms
Member
169 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Apr 20, 2010 13:03 |  #12

If $ is an issue, I recommend the older apple cinema displays (aluminum enclosure) they are an IPS panel and are very easily calibrated...

These screens can be had for a very fair price on the used market....

I believe you're using a pc, so the next tip does not apply, though i'm sure there is a windows program that is similar... The program I recommend using is called pixel check... (mac) it pushes a pure white, black, red, blue, and green, signal to the screen... it will fill the screen entirely and is a great fast and easy way to check for dead pixels, backlight uniformity, etc etc etc....

Around my area, I've been able to pick up used 23"cinemas between 350$-500$ depending on condition, box, etc etc....

this is definitely a fine screen and within a reasonable budget...

another great screen are the new lacies, i believe the model is the 324.... they are retailing around 900$ - 1100$ I believe depending on monitor hood, colorimeter, etc...

very good and reasonably priced.

as always just my .02




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pip ­ boogaloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: newcastle upon tyne
     
Apr 22, 2010 03:45 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

thanks all - i settled on a dell u2711, got it all setup now and happy with it.
still have to proper calibrate it so would be interested in what mode you use (those that own it)
thanks again


'i just ate a Nikonian'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doc ­ Fluty
Goldmember
Avatar
1,762 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Gulfport, Ms
     
Apr 22, 2010 04:59 |  #14

you should set the monitor to custom... might want to take the brightness down to a cofortable level.. i have mine on 36.. then calibrate using something good. I use spyderpro 3 elite... seems to doing great.

like at this page.. i can see the differences in all the blocks and can other tests of the same manner

http://www.gballard.ne​t/boutique/colorcorrec​ting.html (external link)

really love the 2560x1440 resolution too (once i figured out i needed a dual link dvi cord and not a cheapy i had lying around)


My Facebook Fan Page (external link) - My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,720 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
ips lcd convince me please
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1084 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.