DoN_WoN Senior Member 309 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Apr 19, 2010 20:00 | #1 I was planning on buying this bag for my gear, but just noticed there was a 202 that looks really similar to the 200, the only difference i see is the tripod strap on the side, which can be useful to me. Flickr Add Me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2010 14:26 | #2 |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop"  57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Apr 20, 2010 14:33 | #3 I have a Slingshot 300 and frankly, I hardly ever use it because it's not comfortable at all. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
[Hyuni] Goldmember  1,186 posts Likes: 15 Joined Dec 2008 Location: CHiCAGO More info | Apr 20, 2010 14:50 | #4 I have to agree. I have the 200AW and it's neither comfortable or makes your camera gear safely accessible. 6D Rokinon 14 f/2.8 l EF 35 ƒ1.4L l EF 135 ƒ2.0L l EF 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II l YN460 l 580EX II l Flick'd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2010 14:51 | #5 FlyingPhotog wrote in post #10031967  I have a Slingshot 300 and frankly, I hardly ever use it because it's not comfortable at all. It's become my "strobist" bag carrying Speedlites, Skyports and Batteries and that's about all. what bag do you have to carry a griped 50d, 28-135, 15-85, 580exii, 430exii, and pocketwizards? and have room over for more gear later on, and is a backpack style, i already have a shoulder bag but its not good for travel Flickr Add Me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2010 15:09 | #6 the flipside 300 is nice, but not quite sure if i need that much room, i dont have a big lens like a 70-200, how much bigger is the 300 compared to the 200? Flickr Add Me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
[Hyuni] Goldmember 1,186 posts Likes: 15 Joined Dec 2008 Location: CHiCAGO More info | Apr 20, 2010 15:21 | #7 as for size, the flipside is about the same size at the SS200AW. 6D Rokinon 14 f/2.8 l EF 35 ƒ1.4L l EF 135 ƒ2.0L l EF 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II l YN460 l 580EX II l Flick'd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2010 15:35 | #8 [Hyuni wrote: ='[Hyuni];10032233']as for size, the flipside is about the same size at the SS200AW. I agree that maybe the 300 might be a bit too big for you, but it's very comfortable and when you put your waist strap on, you can turn it around and safely and easily access your equipment. I like how the bag acts like a table where you can switch lenses or grab gear. I've been through a lot of different bags, but I like the flipside the most. im really liking the flipside 200, and the idea that you can flip it around on the waste band and it acts like a table, i think im going to order that one in black right now! thanks for your help! Flickr Add Me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LotsToLearn Goldmember 2,290 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: GTA, Canada More info | Apr 21, 2010 09:13 | #10 The SS200 is my most frequently used day to day bag of the few I own. It would have been nice if the tripod version was available at the time I bought mine. Given the choice today, I would get the 202.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 21, 2010 09:26 | #11 I have the 200, and I've loved it! EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful"  More info | I've had the 200AW for a few years now.. It's the bag I take when I'm travelling light.. One body+grip, three lenses, Speedlite and other bits and pieces.. It's comfortable for hours and fits nicely into the overhead compartment in a plane.. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgara Goldmember  2,336 posts Likes: 8 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA More info | Here's a video describing the new features and improvements in the SlingShot 202. EOS 5D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Skids Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Northampton, United Kingdom More info | Jun 18, 2010 08:04 | #14 DoN_WoN wrote in post #10027003 I was planning on buying this bag for my gear, but just noticed there was a 202 that looks really similar to the 200, the only difference i see is the tripod strap on the side, which can be useful to me. Are there any other differences besides that? http://products.lowepro.com …ingShot-200-AW,2035,4.htm http://products.lowepro.com …ingShot-202-AW,2192,4.htm I have just bought a 202 as the zip broke on my 200. The top pocket (triangular one) is bigger and the microfiber cloth in the bag that was on the bottom when laid down to open the bag is now on the side.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bRokEnCHaRacTer Mostly Lurking  13 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Old Europe More info | Jun 26, 2010 04:00 | #15 I'd get a AW 202, but the 200 is great too. I use mine since 2008 and I love it. For the size, it holds a lot of gear:
Lights, cleaning material, filters, a GPS, the 5D MK II, 24-70, 70-200 f4, 16-35 and a Speedlite 580EXII with a ST-E2  Snapshooting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2671 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
