Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Apr 2010 (Monday) 22:46
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which would you get rid of first?"
24-105L
36
32.7%
70-200 f4L IS
29
26.4%
35L
22
20%
135L
23
20.9%

110 voters, 110 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need to Sell One Lens

 
Yamaha451
Senior Member
Avatar
466 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:46 |  #1

Out of my 4 lenses, which one would you sell and why? I need some extra cash to close on a house, thus I need to liquidate one lens.

I do not shoot for a living, just for fun. I enjoy taking landscapes, dog pictures, travel, general stuff, ect. I've been loving the look of the primes, and lately that has been all I've been shooting with. Its just hard to part with one of them, because they each serve a purpose.

24-105
70-200 f4 IS
35L
135L


-Mark-
5DII||35L|Sigma 85 1.4|24-105L| 580EX IIhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=765323

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
That_Fox
"In the Witless Protection Program"
Avatar
1,386 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Southern California
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:48 |  #2

What lens do you find yourself picking up the least often?


Apparently I've been dubbed Foxy.
Alamy (external link), website (external link) and gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:48 |  #3

Well... out of all your lenses the 35L is worth the most money, so if you sold it, you would get the most money for it.

The other three are worth about the same... well what you use the least I guess!


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yamaha451
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
466 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:54 |  #4

I use the 70-200 the least at the moment. But I've only had the primes for 4 months, so I guess the newness of those hasn't worn off yet. Even when I didn't have the primes, I still rarely used the 70-200.


-Mark-
5DII||35L|Sigma 85 1.4|24-105L| 580EX IIhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=765323

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vitacura
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Tampa Bay, Fl
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:56 |  #5

If you do choose to sell the 70-200, then down the road if you decide to get the 70-200 again you may want to upgrade to the 2.8


Gear & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Apr 19, 2010 22:56 |  #6

I think the 135L and the 70-200 are somewhat redundant. I'd ditch whichever one you think would be easier to live without.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Apr 19, 2010 23:19 |  #7

I would get rid of the 70-200.

Yamaha451 wrote in post #10028054 (external link)
I use the 70-200 the least at the moment. But I've only had the primes for 4 months, so I guess the newness of those hasn't worn off yet. Even when I didn't have the primes, I still rarely used the 70-200.


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AKHOO
Senior Member
284 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Apr 19, 2010 23:58 |  #8

I would get rid of the 70-200 f/4L IS. In fact, that's what I am doing with mine.


EOS 7D | 35L | 85L II | 135L | 430EX II | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Apr 20, 2010 01:40 |  #9

Since you like primes, the 135 does and 24-105 makes the 70-200 not as useful, I'd say sell that.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Apr 20, 2010 03:15 |  #10

You could always sell the 70-200 and pick up a used 200mm 2.8 at another point in time when you get some cash together this summer.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Apr 20, 2010 03:20 |  #11

Only you know the answer to this. Take responsibility for your own decisions ;-)a


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MHO
Goldmember
Avatar
1,406 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Kingston, Surrey
     
Apr 20, 2010 03:25 |  #12

I'd get rid of the 24-105!

you have the super amazing 35L & 135L and the 70-200 f4L IS to cover in between and tele!

If you don't need the tele (which most people do!) then get rid of the 70-200 cause you'll have 24-105 + 135 for extra reach but then you could also drop the 35L cause you have the length covered by the zoom, although not as fast!

Its a tough one! I give you that!


MHO Photography on Flickr (external link)
Facebook Page (external link)
5D2 & 1D2n & Some Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 20, 2010 06:17 |  #13

Never ever sell a 135mm 2.0.... ever.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Laos
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 20, 2010 06:29 as a reply to  @ nightcat's post |  #14

sell both zooms and buy 200L/2.8 to perfectly compliment 35&135, you won't regret it.


5DII | 16 - 400
http://instagram.com/m​jure (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yamaha451
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
466 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Apr 20, 2010 09:19 |  #15

AKHOO wrote in post #10028338 (external link)
I would get rid of the 70-200 f/4L IS. In fact, that's what I am doing with mine.

I think I'll get rid of the 70-200. I have a friend who is so kind as to buy it from me and let me borrow it if I ever need it again!

Thanks for all the input guys.


-Mark-
5DII||35L|Sigma 85 1.4|24-105L| 580EX IIhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=765323

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,648 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Need to Sell One Lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
944 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.