Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Jul 2005 (Sunday) 11:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Upgrade conundrum!

 
TroPhoto
Member
124 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
     
Jul 17, 2005 11:55 |  #1

I currently own a D30 with battery grip and 28-135 IS and 75-300 IS. I want to upgrade but am going back and forth on which path is best. I shoot mostly wildlife, scenics and archetecture with a few portraits mixed in. I have sold images in the past, before I went digital, and my goal is to get back doing that. Thus image quality is important as is, unfortunately, cost. My current thiking, in no particular order is:

1) Buy 20d and keep the lenses.

2) Buy 350D/XT sell the 75-300 and get maybe a 100-400L (can use the backup later on)

3) Buy a used 10d and get 100-400L or 70-200 IS

4) keep the D30 and get a killer new lens or two.

I know the D30 probably is not worth much on the used market so selling it does not really change my outcome.

All advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Happy shooting

Craig




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Jul 17, 2005 12:18 |  #2

If I was happy with my lenses, I'd buy a 20D or 350XD and use my current glass. I would add a long L lens later (100-400 or just the 400 f/5.6 prime)

The 20D is three generations more advanced.. It does most things better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TroPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
124 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
     
Jul 17, 2005 12:46 as a reply to  @ Jim_T's post |  #3

Thanks for your input Jim.

I am happy with the 28-135 but the 75-300 is slow focusing and I long for additional sharpness. I presume the 20D will help in focusing speed but will it help in the sharpness category too?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darkdrakon
Member
Avatar
119 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Living large in sunny southern califorina
     
Jul 17, 2005 13:53 as a reply to  @ TroPhoto's post |  #4

the 20D wont help with the lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
Jul 17, 2005 13:57 |  #5

You might be best off buying a used 10D and getting some good long lenses. I have the 70-200 f2.8 non-IS and so far I don't see why anyone would need IS on this lens. The 100-400 IS would also be a good one to get.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,741 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 203
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jul 17, 2005 14:24 |  #6

I'd go for a used 10D or a 300D and get a better lens.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Borcik
Member
Avatar
161 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: USA, Reisterstown, Md
     
Jul 17, 2005 14:41 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #7

I owned a 10D and I can tell you... you won't be satisfied with it... I wasn't. :( I would never own one again! ! ! If I were you, I would bite the bullet and go with the 350xt or better yet the 20D (better choice). You will like the dynamic range and focus speed a whole lot better! :) I know a few people that liked the Rebel (300) and recently upgraded to the 20D. They are extremely pleased with it from it's light weight to it's picture quality and speed. Upgrading is always a tough choice! ! ! :confused:


1D MkII; 100 Macro, 24-70L, 70-200L IS, 100-400L IS, 1.4x MkII, Sigma 600mm
http://jrbphoto.smugmu​g.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David1943
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Leicestershire - England
     
Jul 17, 2005 14:57 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

You've partially answered the question yourself by saying you want to "upgrade."

Go for a 20D. You already own a couple of respectable lenses and you can add to them later.

Regards, David :)


Regards, David

Canon black 300D with Grip, 18-55 Kit Lens, 28-300 Tamron XR Di LD, Canon 550EX Speedlight, Olympus C-720, Canon EOS600, 28-200 Sigma, Canon EOS1000F, 35-105 Canon.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rob612
Goldmember
Avatar
2,459 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
     
Jul 17, 2005 16:40 as a reply to  @ RikWriter's post |  #9

RikWriter wrote:
I have the 70-200 f2.8 non-IS and so far I don't see why anyone would need IS on this lens.

Try to get a steady shot @1/40-200mm and you'll find out ! :) :) Personal experience, I had the non IS and switched to IS just because I was somehow depressed. I don't regret a penny and will buy it again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
Jul 17, 2005 20:43 as a reply to  @ Rob612's post |  #10

Rob612 wrote:
Try to get a steady shot @1/40-200mm and you'll find out ! :) :)

Did it already, while I was initially testing the lens. Wasn't that hard.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TroPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
124 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
     
Jul 18, 2005 12:56 as a reply to  @ RikWriter's post |  #11

Thanks all for the input. Im still not sure which way I will ultimately go, its a dollars thing unfortunately. But I am quite sure the D30 is going.

Thanks again for all the constructive input.

Cheers

Craig




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Jul 18, 2005 13:03 |  #12

I'd go with choice no. 2 :) The 350D's sensor is pretty awesome, a step above your D30. You'll love the high ISO performance, and the extra megapixels. Cropability!

It might be a little small and plastiky though.

Anyway, I'd sell the d30 and pick up a Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM. The 100-400L is way better but the question is $$$ ;)


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,064 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Upgrade conundrum!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
974 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.