I got +5 as being best setting. What did you get?
mitchman Senior Member 254 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Eastern Washington State More info | Apr 23, 2010 20:24 | #2 I have the 70-200 IS II and a 5D Mk2. What are you talking about? (sorry, kinda a newbie) 5DM2, 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, 16-35 f/2.8, Really Right Stuff BH-55 LR, Gitzo GT3531
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2010 20:28 | #3 mitchman wrote in post #10054160 I have the 70-200 IS II and a 5D Mk2. What are you talking about? (sorry, kinda a newbie) No problem...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mastamarek Goldmember 1,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Warsaw, Poland More info | Apr 23, 2010 20:30 | #4 mitchman wrote in post #10054160 I have the 70-200 IS II and a 5D Mk2. What are you talking about? (sorry, kinda a newbie) for me micro adjustments in photography is the same thing as back focus/flange focal length in the film/video world. [Facebook®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mitchman Senior Member 254 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Eastern Washington State More info | Apr 23, 2010 20:32 | #5 Ahhhh.......backfocus. I understand about that. 5DM2, 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, 16-35 f/2.8, Really Right Stuff BH-55 LR, Gitzo GT3531
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2010 20:39 | #6 mitchman wrote in post #10054201 Ahhhh.......backfocus. I understand about that. ![]() Shouldn't use us the Lens Align tool for this type of stuff? Or are you saying you can do this with your eye? You can do it with the lens align tool but you can also set up your own with a tripod, focus targets (like AA batteries), and plenty of light.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Apr 23, 2010 22:06 | #7 I haven't had to MA at all on the 1Ds III. It works right out of the box for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2010 22:22 | #8 jdizzle wrote in post #10054700 I haven't had to MA at all on the 1Ds III. It works right out of the box for me. ![]() You are very fortunate!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Apr 23, 2010 22:26 | #9 Yes indeed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2010 22:43 | #10 jdizzle wrote in post #10054801 Yes indeed. Have a look at my sample gallery. All shot with the 70-200 2.8 IS MK II and 1Ds III. http://dlimaging.zenfolio.com/p731909028 Btw, how much did you have to MA your 85 L? Thanks for showing me the sample gallery Julian! Your lens is clearly working well with your body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2010 22:49 | #11 jdizzle wrote in post #10054801 Btw, how much did you have to MA your 85 L? The only lens that I could not improve at all with the M-AF was the 16-35II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Apr 23, 2010 23:04 | #12 mebailey wrote in post #10054878 Thanks for showing me the sample gallery Julian! Your lens is clearly working well with your body. Believe it or not, my 85L required +18 MAF!! And that's after a trip to Canon repair! Iam very happy with it's performance now... Mike Woah! +18? That's a bit extreme. mebailey wrote in post #10054895 The only lens that I could not improve at all with the M-AF was the 16-35II. My 16-35 II works well w/o MA too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 759 guests, 144 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||