Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 24 Apr 2010 (Saturday) 01:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CC this set please!

 
Sole ­ into ­ it
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Apr 24, 2010 01:11 |  #1

The only PP is that I tweaked the sharpness a bit.A couple of quick flicks for a friends blog so the quality didn't matter, but I wanna learn so please!

#!

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4016/4547584538_551a62642f_b.jpg
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/160Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F8.0
ISO Speed
800
Focal Length
18.0 mm
Flash
On

#2
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4060/4547585584_144c006725_b.jpg
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/50Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F1.8
ISO Speed
800
Focal Length
50.0 mm
Flash
Off

#3
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/4546949505_5a6b8d70e7_b.jpg
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/20Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F1.8

ISO Speed
800
Focal Length
50.0 mm
Flash
Off

#4
IMAGE: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/8/4547586558_7063970b66_b.jpg
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/200Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F13
ISO Speed
800
Focal Length
18.0 mm
Flash
On

#5
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4025/4547587252_21fd83ca72_b.jpg
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/200Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F13
ISO Speed
800
Focal Length
23.0 mm
Flash
On

Something is up with my Exif data so I just copied it.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lookingforaname
Senior Member
820 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Collingswood, NJ
     
Apr 24, 2010 10:01 |  #2

When you use onboard flash, the pictures end up kinda snapshotty, especially with the harsh shadows, so 2 and 3 are the ones that I feel are the most promising.


June Day Photography - Junedayphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anj273
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Denmark
     
Apr 24, 2010 10:49 |  #3

lookingforaname wrote in post #10056579 (external link)
When you use onboard flash, the pictures end up kinda snapshotty, especially with the harsh shadows, so 2 and 3 are the ones that I feel are the most promising.

Yeah, what he said! Never ever use on-camera flash... But if you have to, at least bounce it .

I actually like no. 2 alot - Great shot mate :D


Andreas
5D Classic - 50 mm f/1.4
Blog (external link) (in danish)
Flickr (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 24, 2010 11:47 |  #4

Very difficult for an old fashioned guy like me to find any point to this group.

If you seriously want a critique on your work, I suggest submitting just one picture. Also, if there is a particular aspect of photography that you would like to learn about through your images, let us know.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoCupcake
Senior Member
Avatar
673 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Apr 24, 2010 13:16 |  #5

anj273 wrote in post #10056770 (external link)
Yeah, what he said! Never ever use on-camera flash... But if you have to, at least bounce it .

Pardon my inexperience, but what does "bounce it" mean? Diffuser?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anj273
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Denmark
     
Apr 24, 2010 13:28 |  #6

PhotoCupcake wrote in post #10057432 (external link)
Pardon my inexperience, but what does "bounce it" mean? Diffuser?

Not exactly, when using a flash, bouncing means to turn or swivel the flash up, down or to the side, so that the light hits a wall or a ceiling. This way the light which hits the subject will be diffused, and have a much more appealing quality.

Obviously this is hard (if not impossible) to do with a built-in flash...


Andreas
5D Classic - 50 mm f/1.4
Blog (external link) (in danish)
Flickr (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoCupcake
Senior Member
Avatar
673 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Apr 24, 2010 15:44 |  #7

anj273 wrote in post #10057485 (external link)
Not exactly, when using a flash, bouncing means to turn or swivel the flash up, down or to the side, so that the light hits a wall or a ceiling. This way the light which hits the subject will be diffused, and have a much more appealing quality.

Obviously this is hard (if not impossible) to do with a built-in flash...

Great, thanks. So it is essentially using static objects as reflectors?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anj273
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Denmark
     
Apr 24, 2010 15:49 |  #8

PhotoCupcake wrote in post #10058004 (external link)
Great, thanks. So it is essentially using static objects as reflectors?

They don't have to be static ;-)a

When using mobile reflectors, you're still bouncing. All it means is to change the path of the light.


Andreas
5D Classic - 50 mm f/1.4
Blog (external link) (in danish)
Flickr (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoCupcake
Senior Member
Avatar
673 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Apr 24, 2010 15:52 |  #9

Cool. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Apr 24, 2010 16:01 |  #10

I think the depth of field in number 2 is great - maybe a tiny bit more would have worked - but I'd call it great, well done!

Number 3 is a bit "foggy" - I'm not sure where that white sheen comes from... if you could remove it on the face of the guy in focus it might work - but like this... I don't like it.

The others - I'm generally not a great fan of people shots - so I can't quite comment.


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpistone
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
Apr 24, 2010 23:48 |  #11

#2 is great! Not sure about #3, but it caught my eye at least. I think I'd rather a bit more contrast to take away that haze.
I'm not crazy about the people shots, #4 is kinda interesting for me though.
Watch for keeping horizontal things horizontal, too :)


-Matt
40D | 10-22mm | 17-85mm IS | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 f4 | 100mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sole ­ into ­ it
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:57 |  #12

Thanks for all the input everyone. I really appreciate it. I actually just got a new flash a couple days ago and once I'm through with classes and such I'll definitely be testing it out. Any quick tips on bouncing the flash?

Robert_Lay - I guess my main focus will be taking portraits and natural shots of people. I want the pictures to come out looking fairly natural. Taking out a lot of harsh light which I'm sure the new flash will take care of. Any tips?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 27, 2010 15:55 |  #13

Sole into it wrote in post #10076984 (external link)
Thanks for all the input everyone. I really appreciate it. I actually just got a new flash a couple days ago and once I'm through with classes and such I'll definitely be testing it out. Any quick tips on bouncing the flash?

Robert_Lay - I guess my main focus will be taking portraits and natural shots of people. I want the pictures to come out looking fairly natural. Taking out a lot of harsh light which I'm sure the new flash will take care of. Any tips?

I'm glad to see that you are interested in portraits - as a painter, I much prefer doing portraits over landscapes.

In portraits the lighting is even more important than it is in landscapes - the reason being that in portraits you do not create 3-D realism in the way you do so in landscapes. In landscapes the 3-D effect is created by composing your scene with foreground interest, middle ground interest and background interest.

However, in portraits you generally do not have but one plane to worry about and that is the plane of the subject of the portrait - so, how do you create the 3-D realism? The answer is that you create 3-D realism in your subject by creating areas of light and areas of shadow that create the illusion of 3-dimensionality. For example, Rembrandt realized that you had to have shadows to delineate the facial contours. He preferred a light that cast shadows diagonally across the face. Those shadows made the facial contours quite clear. If instead you illuminate your subject with light shining directly into the face (flat lighting), you end up with virtually no features at all. Try taking the flash off-camera and hold it above and to one side of your subject and see if the resulting shadows falling diagonally across the face don't make the face look more realistic.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottdog129
Senior Member
Avatar
637 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Reno, Nevada USA
     
Apr 27, 2010 16:37 |  #14

#2 - The DOF is really catching! Love this one.

#3 - This one has a nice, warm feel to it. A sincerity, if you will.

The others just kind of look like snap shots from a point-and-shoot, honestly. They dont do much for me.

Keep it up!


Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com (external link)
Canon EOS 30D - Canon 18-55mm f/3.5 - Sigma 10-20mm f/4 DSM -Canon 55-250mm IS - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeenPhotog
Senior Member
Avatar
344 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Philadelphia
     
Apr 27, 2010 18:32 |  #15

3 is best, nailed the DOF, followed by 2


Canon 450D | 50 1.8 | 18-55 | 55-250 | 430ex ii | http://abramowitzimage​s.zenfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,821 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
CC this set please!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1391 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.