Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 24 Apr 2010 (Saturday) 07:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question about Carbonite, Mozy, and others

 
golfecho
(I will regret that)
Avatar
2,344 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2604
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
     
Apr 27, 2010 07:20 |  #31

Guapo wrote in post #10069677 (external link)
I think it is unreasonable to expect full backups of all storage including external drives for $50/yr. It would really get out of hand. It is pretty significant that I can conceivably backup all 2.5TB of my internal storage, though. They have to limit it somehow. Your use of external drives for all data is not their fault. I believe their new corporate targeted "Carbonite Pro" service will backup from external USB drives.

The beauty of this system is that you don't even have to think about it. Just set your target directory, and it updates the backup with any changes automatically in the background.

I agree with you, Steven. My only point was that many of us use external drives to hold our data, and backup of those was not available (back when I attempted to use their service, about 1 year ago). This fact was not readily apparent on their web site, and I had to dig through numerous pages of FAQ to find that out.

I understand that they have the "Pro" account now, and that may be the right option. But for the standard $50/yr, their policy should place the limit on volume of data, not where you happen to keep it on your computer.


Facebook (external link) or Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spkerer
Senior Member
Avatar
953 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA USA
     
Apr 27, 2010 07:29 |  #32

Cashoo wrote in post #10058715 (external link)
It's always good to have 2 copies of everything, so off-line and online copy or a copy not at home .

The main problem with online back up is the rate it uploads which is much slower than backing up to a hard drive. Also if your a photographer storing 10's of GB's a month, backing up online would take forever.

That's why I dropped mozy and just rely on usb drives now. I keep one at work and periodically - weekly-ish - take it home and backup to it.

Mozy would literally take DAYS sometimes to do its next backup if I had a lot of files. And that was the paid version of Mozy...


Leesburg, Virginia
http://photos.kusterer​s.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Apr 27, 2010 08:04 |  #33

golfecho wrote in post #10074266 (external link)
I understand that they have the "Pro" account now, and that may be the right option. But for the standard $50/yr, their policy should place the limit on volume of data, not where you happen to keep it on your computer.

Agreed.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:32 |  #34
bannedPermanently

Maybe the reason mozy has a no limit policy for $50 is because bandwidth will act as a flow meter controlling how much can be stored. For sure most people do not have T1 lines in their house.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thalagyrt
D'OH. I need to wake up some more.
Avatar
4,818 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Denver, CO
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:37 |  #35

jetcode wrote in post #10076791 (external link)
Maybe the reason mozy has a no limit policy for $50 is because bandwidth will act as a flow meter controlling how much can be stored. For sure most people do not have T1 lines in their house.

Most home connections have uploads that rival a T1's measly 1.54 Mbit/sec each way, and download rates that downright slay it. A T1 was hot stuff back in 1999, maybe.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spkerer
Senior Member
Avatar
953 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA USA
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:39 |  #36

jetcode wrote in post #10076791 (external link)
Maybe the reason mozy has a no limit policy for $50 is because bandwidth will act as a flow meter controlling how much can be stored. For sure most people do not have T1 lines in their house.

Mozy throttles your upload bandwidth. Cranked to maximum upload speed, I still had plenty of upload bandwidth left. I have fiber to the home and good upload speeds. I even tested by uploading to zenfolio at the same time... mozy at "maximum" upload speed was using much less than I could upload. And I was using their paid version.


Leesburg, Virginia
http://photos.kusterer​s.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Guapo
Senior Member
Avatar
548 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:51 |  #37

blackhawk wrote in post #10072097 (external link)
Will they limit files to 2 internal HDs, or is that just for auto backups?
With eight active SATA ports and more one 1 TB HDs... well you get the idea.


According to their FAQ (external link): How much stuff can I back up?

There are no limits on backup storage capacity. Carbonite will back up all the supported files on your internal hard drive whether you have 1GB, 10GB or more. However, users should be aware that the speed of today's DSL and cable Internet services will make it very slow to back up more than, say, a few dozen GB of data.


As far as I can tell, that means anything internal. I have directories assigned from two different physical drives I have in my machine, with no complaints. Of course, having my FIOS 35/35 helps, too. :)


- Steven
Canon 7D MkII

Nifty Fifty - Canon 17-55 f2.8 - Canon 70-200 f2.8
L IS MkII -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:52 |  #38

Thalagyrt wrote in post #10076827 (external link)
Most home connections have uploads that rival a T1's measly 1.54 Mbit/sec each way, and download rates that downright slay it. A T1 was hot stuff back in 1999, maybe.

Ha-ha, T-1 no, FIOS YES!!:D


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Guapo
Senior Member
Avatar
548 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Apr 27, 2010 14:58 |  #39

spkerer wrote in post #10076844 (external link)
Mozy throttles your upload bandwidth. Cranked to maximum upload speed, I still had plenty of upload bandwidth left. I have fiber to the home and good upload speeds. I even tested by uploading to zenfolio at the same time... mozy at "maximum" upload speed was using much less than I could upload. And I was using their paid version.

Carbonite is pretty much the same way. I haven't used Mozy, but Carbonite's service is designed to be non-intrusive, only uploading in the background during periods of inactivity. After initial upload, it is only an incremental backup anyway.

With my 35 mbit upload connection, I can dump the better part of an 8GB card of RAW's, and it would be uploaded in about 24-48 hours if I leave my machine on when I go to work.


- Steven
Canon 7D MkII

Nifty Fifty - Canon 17-55 f2.8 - Canon 70-200 f2.8
L IS MkII -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spkerer
Senior Member
Avatar
953 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA USA
     
Apr 27, 2010 15:53 |  #40

Guapo wrote in post #10076994 (external link)
Carbonite is pretty much the same way. I haven't used Mozy, but Carbonite's service is designed to be non-intrusive, only uploading in the background during periods of inactivity. After initial upload, it is only an incremental backup anyway.

"Non-intrusive" is such a nicer way of saying "we only let you upload at a restricted rate." Mozy has a slider where you can set it to "max upload, I don't care how intrusive you are" (paraphrased a bit). Even at that setting, I can still watch as each bit goes up the fiber.

I think whoever said it already hit the nail on the head... they don't claim any limits on how much you can store because they only let you get it up there but so fast, putting a practical limit on how much you can get up there.

With my 35 mbit upload connection, I can dump the better part of an 8GB card of RAW's, and it would be uploaded in about 24-48 hours if I leave my machine on when I go to work.

Taking multiple days for incremental backups is unacceptable to me.

When you cancel mozy's service, of the choices they list for why you're canceling the service - one of the first is "too slow upload times."


Leesburg, Virginia
http://photos.kusterer​s.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CJM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 27, 2010 15:57 |  #41
bannedPermanent ban

Sparky98 wrote in post #10056082 (external link)
Do the off site back up companies such as Carbonite compress files any? I would assume not but I have read a lot of posts about the various back up sites and I have never seen that specific question addressed.

I know carbonate does not, check out TWIT.com Correction: Twit.TV for discount codes


Canon T1i- gripped - 70-200 F4L IS - 430exII - Lowepro Fastpack 350
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CJM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 27, 2010 15:58 as a reply to  @ spkerer's post |  #42
bannedPermanent ban

Took me 12-13 days to back up my 180gb's of files.


Canon T1i- gripped - 70-200 F4L IS - 430exII - Lowepro Fastpack 350
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Guapo
Senior Member
Avatar
548 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Apr 27, 2010 16:07 as a reply to  @ spkerer's post |  #43

For $50/ yr, I can live with limiting my backups to my (currently) 2.5TB of internal drive space. I can also live with the risk of a fire or break-in happening between the time I generate the content and the time it gets uploaded. I have the peace of mind to know that my 3rd level of backup is automatic, without me having to think about it.

I also use an NAS in the closet as my primary backup to my internal drives, then let Carbonite do it's thing without it bothering me or hogging my bandwidth. For me, I don't NEED it to max out. If I needed all out max performance uploads, then I could just upload directly to my web server.


- Steven
Canon 7D MkII

Nifty Fifty - Canon 17-55 f2.8 - Canon 70-200 f2.8
L IS MkII -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Guapo
Senior Member
Avatar
548 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Apr 27, 2010 16:07 |  #44

1911 wrote in post #10077372 (external link)
I know carbonate does not, check out TWIT.com for discount codes

twit.tv

Leo is awesome.


- Steven
Canon 7D MkII

Nifty Fifty - Canon 17-55 f2.8 - Canon 70-200 f2.8
L IS MkII -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CJM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 27, 2010 16:10 |  #45
bannedPermanent ban

Guapo wrote in post #10077448 (external link)
twit.tv

Leo is awesome.

AH good point, thank you.


Canon T1i- gripped - 70-200 F4L IS - 430exII - Lowepro Fastpack 350
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,569 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Question about Carbonite, Mozy, and others
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1583 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.