5 shot AEB ran through photomatix pro. C&C welcome.
 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by ADVERTISEMENT |
Apr 25, 2010 21:09 | #1 5 shot AEB ran through photomatix pro. C&C welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop  7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Apr 25, 2010 22:10 | #2 Has all the hallmarks of HDR processing - which I happen to like. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotoCupcake Senior Member  673 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 25, 2010 22:18 | #3 Too much for my taste. Seems flat and has halos. Too small a resolution to see really see the details, though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2010 06:18 | #4 Where are you seeing the halos? Here's a bit larger version of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotoCupcake Senior Member 673 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Apr 26, 2010 10:41 | #5 dsd17 wrote in post #10066635  Where are you seeing the halos? In the sky surrounding the trees.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Very nicely done, and I think the mottled sky is giving the impression of some halos, but I am not seeing any due to processing. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VinnieHillKovich Member 82 posts Joined Apr 2010 More info | Apr 26, 2010 15:02 | #8 Wow... I'm a sucker for old, abandoned, rundown, and torn-down-by-fire buildings... Awesome capture, great work! 7d, 5d, 50mm 1.8, 24mm 2.8, 100mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2010 20:33 | #9 Awesome location, but as thesilent said, there's just not any separation between foreground and background. If you can't do that in camera, I would really post process that, or gaussian blur the background on your bottom layer and mask out the background on your top layer so you get some separation in your final print. I think that would be stellar! My Blog: http://www.harmonweddings.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2010 07:48 | #10 Stephen A. Harmon wrote in post #10071320 Awesome location, but as thesilent said, there's just not any separation between foreground and background. If you can't do that in camera, I would really post process that, or gaussian blur the background on your bottom layer and mask out the background on your top layer so you get some separation in your final print. I think that would be stellar! I really wish I knew photoshop better... The trees really did envelope the ruins from the angle I took the shot. The other angles were pretty boring. If you want a shot at it I can send you the tiff file.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeMcGowan Member  238 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Bensalem, PA More info | Apr 28, 2010 08:32 | #11 Next time you do an HDR in Photomatix, try using Exposure Blend instead of Generate HDR. Looks a lot more realistic. Canon 50D | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | Tamron 90mm f/2.8 | Peleng 8mm f/3.5 | Canon 580ex | Vivitar 285hv(3) | PW Plus II Transceiver(4)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2010 08:38 | #12 I don't know - my eyes react "weirldy" to this image - or its my brain. 5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2010 09:02 | #13 MikeMcGowan wrote in post #10081502 Next time you do an HDR in Photomatix, try using Exposure Blend instead of Generate HDR. Looks a lot more realistic. Who says I wanted it to look realistic? DetlevCM wrote: I don't know - my eyes react "weirldy" to this image - or its my brain. The trees are blurred - I guess there was some wind? Somehow the trees look bad to me... And the building - or what's left of it, looks rather unsharp on the right hand side. I don't know... while its a very nice idea - I can't look at the image for a long time That's ok. It's not for everyone. Thanks for looking.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2010 09:04 | #14 dsd17 wrote in post #10081611 That's ok. It's not for everyone. Thanks for looking. Thanks - but its not generally HDRs... 5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeMcGowan Member 238 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Bensalem, PA More info | Apr 28, 2010 09:19 | #15 The whole overdone HDR thing is too common, and everyone's seen it. Its never really pleasing to look at anymore, so just give it a shot next time. I use Exposure Blend all the time, and my HDRs come out looking exactly how I saw them with my eyes. Everything exposed perfectly, and no HDR look. Canon 50D | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | Tamron 90mm f/2.8 | Peleng 8mm f/3.5 | Canon 580ex | Vivitar 285hv(3) | PW Plus II Transceiver(4)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1376 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
