So any news of a USB 3.0 reader yet? I am so desperate for one.
vinunleaded Senior Member 428 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Apr 26, 2010 14:52 | #1 So any news of a USB 3.0 reader yet? I am so desperate for one. Canon 5DII + 70-200 2.8 IS L + 580EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rvdw98 Goldmember 1,592 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Apr 26, 2010 15:59 | #2 What cards will you be using it with to take advantage of the higher transfer speeds? Roy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
snails "I used the last of it to tip the strippers." 1,517 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Ann Arbor, MI More info | Apr 26, 2010 17:05 | #3 I haven't even seen a computer for sale with a USB 3.0 port. Canon EOS 7D • EOS 5D Mark II • EOS 40D • PowerShot G10 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM • EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM • EF 50mm f/1.4 USM • EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM • EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM • EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX | Canon Speedlite 270 EX • Speedlite 430 EX | Sigma EF 500 DG Super
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2010 17:08 | #4 Well USB 3.0 Express Cards and PCI Cards are out. Now all I need is a reader to transfer my 32GB Cards to my comp quickly enough after each shoot Canon 5DII + 70-200 2.8 IS L + 580EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
e02937 Goldmember 2,714 posts Joined Dec 2008 More info | Apr 26, 2010 17:13 | #5 snails wrote in post #10070070 I haven't even seen a computer for sale with a USB 3.0 port. You may want to see someone about that desperation. That's pretty extreme for a simple card reader. There are definitely machines out there including Dell, Lenovo, etc. Not too many peripherals supporting it yet, but there are some as well. Canon 7d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rvdw98 Goldmember 1,592 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Apr 26, 2010 18:13 | #6 vinunleaded wrote in post #10070086 Well USB 3.0 Express Cards and PCI Cards are out. Now all I need is a reader to transfer my 32GB Cards to my comp quickly enough after each shoot ![]() I'm still interested in knowing what card you're using with a transfer speed exceeding that of USB 2.0. Roy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
keitaro Senior Member 605 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Apr 26, 2010 18:18 | #7 snails wrote in post #10070070 I haven't even seen a computer for sale with a USB 3.0 port. You may want to see someone about that desperation. That's pretty extreme for a simple card reader. There are tons of motherboard and PCI-E cards available already that has USB 3.0 support. Motherboard manufactures such as Asus and Gigabyte already have it incorporated in their boards. While there are other manufactures that have the add on card available. I've even seen them bundled with hard drive packages.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tawcan Goldmember 2,679 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver Canada More info | Apr 26, 2010 18:19 | #8 What's the point? I highly doubt you'll be able to reach the maximum speed of USB2.0 currently. boblai.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sdipirro Goldmember 2,207 posts Likes: 46 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:23 | #9 My 90mb/sec Extreme IV CF cards can go faster than what USB 2.0 will support. I get better performance from my Firewire 800 reader. Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rvdw98 Goldmember 1,592 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:31 | #10 sdipirro wrote in post #10075553 My 90mb/sec Extreme IV CF cards can go faster than what USB 2.0 will support. Sandisk rates the Extreme IV cards at 45 MB/s max. (http://www.sandisk.com/products/dslr Roy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enrigonz Goldmember 1,637 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:35 | #11 sdipirro wrote in post #10075553 My 90mb/sec Extreme IV CF cards can go faster than what USB 2.0 will support. I get better performance from my Firewire 800 reader. I thought USB 2 supports up to 400mb/sec ...... can you please explain? Canon Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rvdw98 Goldmember 1,592 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:37 | #12 enrigonz wrote in post #10075628 I thought USB 2 supports up to 400mb/sec ...... can you please explain? Actually, it's 480 Mb/s (Megabit/s) which translates to 60 MB/s (Megabyte/s). Roy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:39 | #13 enrigonz wrote in post #10075628 I thought USB 2 supports up to 400mb/sec ...... can you please explain? That's Mb (megabits) per second in the USB spec. 45-90 MB (megabytes) per second, which the cards are rated at, correspond to 360-720 mb/sec. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enrigonz Goldmember 1,637 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Apr 27, 2010 11:47 | #14 rvdw98 wrote in post #10075635 Actually, it's 480 Mb/s (Megabit/s) which translates to 60 MB/s (Megabyte/s). http://www.everythingusb.com/usb2/faq.htm#4 Jon wrote in post #10075646 That's Mb (megabits) per second in the USB spec. 45-90 MB (megabytes) per second, which the cards are rated at, correspond to 360-720 mb/sec. Thanks for the explanation! Canon Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sdipirro Goldmember 2,207 posts Likes: 46 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Apr 27, 2010 14:42 | #15 rvdw98 wrote in post #10075602 Sandisk rates the Extreme IV cards at 45 MB/s max. (http://www.sandisk.com/products/dslr Only their Extreme Pro cards will go up to 90 MB/s, but that's still just a theoretical limit (not sustained). And that's what I have. I left out the "Pro" when I posted my reply. I definitely see a speed difference between Firewire 800 and USB 2.0. Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2901 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||