Anyone try using the new 70-200f/2.8 IS II with an extender and like the image quality. If you can please post some pics. I looked through the lens archive and didn't see any.
BrianMc3 Senior Member 296 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Southern New Jersey More info | Apr 28, 2010 21:19 | #1 Anyone try using the new 70-200f/2.8 IS II with an extender and like the image quality. If you can please post some pics. I looked through the lens archive and didn't see any. www.brianmcdonaldphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DANATTHEROCK Goldmember 1,264 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: North Carolina More info | Apr 28, 2010 21:27 | #2 Read on Luminous Landscapes in the "product reviews" section. Seems there is some info there. I know for sure the 2x TC will degrade IQ, the 1.4X from what I have read most are happy with on lenses like you suggest using. I would not consider the 2x TC however. Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mebailey Goldmember 1,992 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2005 Location: USA More info | Apr 28, 2010 21:39 | #3 BrianMc3 wrote in post #10085869 Anyone try using the new 70-200f/2.8 IS II with an extender and like the image quality. If you can please post some pics. I looked through the lens archive and didn't see any. I have a 1.4X and the lens. I will try to get some for you tomorrow
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime Goldmember 1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | Apr 28, 2010 21:56 | #4 Somewhere on here there is a thread entitled something like "Why I haven't bought a 400mm yet" Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mebailey Goldmember 1,992 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2005 Location: USA More info | Here you go! These are test snaps from around the house at iso 800 with the Canon 1.4X II TC. They are handheld without flash at 280mm wide open (f/4). I have included crops 100%. First at 1/125s.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mebailey Goldmember 1,992 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2005 Location: USA More info | More. 1/1250 f/4.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mebailey Goldmember 1,992 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2005 Location: USA More info | Lastly...280mm 1/30!! f/4.0 handheld with IS! The IS really is 4 stops!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denoir Goldmember 1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Apr 29, 2010 19:06 | #8 First full images for reference without the extender on the 7D the focal length is 200 mm and with the extender about 140*1.4 mm so that the size remains roughly the same. The 70-200/II is equally sharp throughout the range so the difference in nominal focal lengths should be of no consequence. Without the extender it's f/2.8 and with the extender f/4.0 Now for the 7D 100% crops, first without then with extender: In short, 1.6 crop + 1.4TC ruins the IQ beyond what I find acceptable. Not to mention that the otherwise magnificent AF lags seriously when the TC is used. So I rarely use it. Finally, the 5DII, 200mm, without extender, 100% crop: Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Apr 29, 2010 19:35 | #9 There is a possibility that you have a out of whack TC. I know I used to have those. Sent it to Canon and the difference was like night and day.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
John7 Member 248 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: Sunny Essex UK More info | That doesn't look right
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sonnyc Cream of the Crop 5,175 posts Likes: 36 Joined Jun 2005 Location: san jose More info | Apr 30, 2010 00:29 | #11 |
denoir Goldmember 1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Apr 30, 2010 02:00 | #12 nicksan wrote in post #10092178 There is a possibility that you have a out of whack TC. I know I used to have those. Sent it to Canon and the difference was like night and day. The 1.4x TC should not degrade the IQ by that much or slow down the AF to a point where it's unusable. It's certainly a possibility but I wouldn't bet on it. I've seen samples from other users with 7Ds and 1DMkIVs and the results are similar. As for AF - it doesn't become unusable - it just degrades heavily. Basically 7D + 70-200/II + TC AF is the equal of 5DII + 70-200/II AF. It's not impossible to use, just annoyingly slow when you are used to a very fast and responsive AF. Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nmura Senior Member 732 posts Likes: 122 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Hawaii More info | Apr 30, 2010 02:04 | #13 Just received my copy of the MkII today... looking forward to using the 1.4x this weekend.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newworld666 Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jan 2009 Location: on earth More info | Apr 30, 2010 02:09 | #14 I suppose you have to adjust microfocus to use TC 1.4X ... It looks like your samples with TC1.4X are out of focus, that's all !!!... Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denoir Goldmember 1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Apr 30, 2010 02:20 | #15 John7 wrote in post #10092350 That doesn't look right I've got this lens and a Canon 2 x convertor - very impressed with images so far. Heres an example @ 400mm, f 5.6 (wide open) ISO125, 1/320, IS on, 5D MkII Ah, but that's a 5DII. Different story altogether. For reference a very similar goose to yours but without TC: 100% crop: 100% crop: Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1174 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||