Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 20:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Upsizing images in RAW

 
red ­ snapper
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Apr 29, 2010 20:27 |  #1

Hi all,

I am wondering what effect on image quality increasing the crop size in CS RAW would have. I have read that this is a way of upsizing images for bigger prints but I would have thought if you only have 10.1 mega pixels that is all you have. Quality must be altered. You thoughts would be appreciated.

Also how large a print would you recomend from my 400D. I shot in RAW and generally 100 ISO if I can. Asssume the shot is sharp etc.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 29, 2010 21:13 |  #2

Not sure what you mean by "increasing crop size". If I want more pixels I just use the image size dialog in Photoshop. If you mean should you do in in ACR, sure, if you want, but it won't make much difference either way. Try it and see :)

Printing FAQ.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Apr 29, 2010 21:35 |  #3

I second the "image size" option. Photoshop is good to about 300%. After that third party plug ins do a lot better.

How big it goes more depends on the quality of the image and the software used to enlarge it. Not what camera it was made with.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ snapper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Apr 30, 2010 18:27 |  #4

Thanks for the comments, I assume that there is no degredation in quality this way.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Apr 30, 2010 18:43 |  #5

Any flaw is magnified with the rest of the image. That is why a quality imge is needed. Keep in mind the bigger it is, the farther the intended viewing distance.(i.e. Nobody looks at a billboard from 3 feet away.) So what degradation you do get is relative, and if you keep the viewing distance in proper ratio, the image should keep its quality.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 30, 2010 18:57 |  #6

red snapper wrote in post #10098190 (external link)
Thanks for the comments, I assume that there is no degredation in quality this way.

There is no way to add data. Upsizing does not get you higher quality or more resolution, just more pixels. At 300ppi your image will be 8.5 by 13. At 20ppi your at 20 by 13 and at 150 ppi your image is 26 by 17. If you printed an image at 150ppi and upsized an image so that you get a 26 by 17 print at 300ppi I'll bet you couldn't spot a difference even close up. Buy remember, the larger the image, the farther the viewing distance.

As an example, I had some posters made at work. I took the images with my 5D. I printed the posters 8 feet by 6 feet. They looked outstanding.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ snapper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Apr 30, 2010 18:58 |  #7

Thanks again, the viewing distance concept makes a lot of sense. I think I will use this. I am only looking at making a print about 60cm by 40cm so i shouldn't be a drama.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,176 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Upsizing images in RAW
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1582 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.