Just playing around with my new camera, and I LOVE to take pictures so any advice you can give to make the pictures of my travels more memorable would be GREAT!
this is at Mayan Ruins in Progresso, Mexico
from the back of the cruise ship
EricaRie Member 47 posts Joined Apr 2010 More info | Apr 30, 2010 07:36 | #1 Just playing around with my new camera, and I LOVE to take pictures so any advice you can give to make the pictures of my travels more memorable would be GREAT! this is at Mayan Ruins in Progresso, Mexico from the back of the cruise ship
LOG IN TO REPLY |
matonanjin Goldmember 2,378 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Omaha, NE More info | Apr 30, 2010 07:39 | #2 I like them all except number 2. The Mayan ruin does nothing for me and you wouldn't what it is without your explanation. Plus it's underexposed. My Web Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2010 07:41 | #3 As I am new to all of this could you explain what you mean by underexposed and how to fix that?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dwarrenr Goldmember 1,650 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Fairland, Indiana More info | Apr 30, 2010 08:18 | #4 Hey Erica, I would have to agree with the second shot. The trees are all under exposed meaning they are too dark. Being that the sky is so bright your cam set a short exposure. Most likely it can be edited PP. I also think it would look better cropped tighter and moving the temple to the upper 1/3rd. That would also make it a little easier to correct the low exposure of the tree line. D. Warren Robison
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Erica- Rocking the R6 and (mostly) the 24-105 f4 L, 50mm f1.8 STM, and EF 135mm f2 L along with a few others.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2010 08:39 | #6 dwarrenr wrote in post #10094936 Hey Erica, I would have to agree with the second shot. The trees are all under exposed meaning they are too dark. Being that the sky is so bright your cam set a short exposure. Most likely it can be edited PP. I also think it would look better cropped tighter and moving the temple to the upper 1/3rd. That would also make it a little easier to correct the low exposure of the tree line. I see what you mean about cropping to put it in top 1/3. That would have looked better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2010 08:40 | #7 I think I simply had the camera in landscape mode at that point.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobBoner Member 90 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Apr 30, 2010 11:20 | #8 Number 2 is my favorite. I would crop it so that the sky occupies only about 1/3 or less of the frame. As others have suggested, I would lighten everything except the sky. You could do this with layers in photo shop. Other PP software probably has similar options for selective lightening and darkening.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Morlow Goldmember 2,824 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Yellowstone National Park More info | Apr 30, 2010 14:50 | #9 #1 is my favorite. Really works for me. Chris Knapp
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2034 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||