Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 30 Apr 2010 (Friday) 07:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

amateur photographer, CC please!

 
EricaRie
Member
47 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 30, 2010 07:36 |  #1

Just playing around with my new camera, and I LOVE to take pictures so any advice you can give to make the pictures of my travels more memorable would be GREAT!

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/EricaWilliams/L1.jpg
boarding cruise ship in Mobile AL

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/EricaWilliams/L3.jpg
this is at Mayan Ruins in Progresso, Mexico

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/EricaWilliams/L5.jpg

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/EricaWilliams/L6.jpg
from the back of the cruise ship



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matonanjin
Goldmember
2,378 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
     
Apr 30, 2010 07:39 |  #2

I like them all except number 2. The Mayan ruin does nothing for me and you wouldn't what it is without your explanation. Plus it's underexposed.


My Web Site (external link)

My Equine Photography Blog (external link)
My Stuff and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EricaRie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 30, 2010 07:41 |  #3

As I am new to all of this could you explain what you mean by underexposed and how to fix that?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dwarrenr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,650 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Fairland, Indiana
     
Apr 30, 2010 08:18 |  #4

Hey Erica, I would have to agree with the second shot. The trees are all under exposed meaning they are too dark. Being that the sky is so bright your cam set a short exposure. Most likely it can be edited PP. I also think it would look better cropped tighter and moving the temple to the upper 1/3rd. That would also make it a little easier to correct the low exposure of the tree line.


D. Warren Robison
"All guys feel the need to compensate. Most compensate with sports cars. I compensate with a 400mm 2.8"
Flickr (external link) - Home Page (external link) - MaxPreps Gallery - (external link)Razzi (external link)
Equipment List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kayl
Senior Member
Avatar
435 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
     
Apr 30, 2010 08:33 as a reply to  @ dwarrenr's post |  #5

Erica-
What mode(s) are you shooting in?


Rocking the R6 and (mostly) the 24-105 f4 L, 50mm f1.8 STM, and EF 135mm f2 L along with a few others.
All of my Gear
Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EricaRie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 30, 2010 08:39 |  #6

dwarrenr wrote in post #10094936 (external link)
Hey Erica, I would have to agree with the second shot. The trees are all under exposed meaning they are too dark. Being that the sky is so bright your cam set a short exposure. Most likely it can be edited PP. I also think it would look better cropped tighter and moving the temple to the upper 1/3rd. That would also make it a little easier to correct the low exposure of the tree line.

I see what you mean about cropping to put it in top 1/3. That would have looked better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EricaRie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 30, 2010 08:40 |  #7

kayl wrote in post #10094990 (external link)
Erica-
What mode(s) are you shooting in?

I think I simply had the camera in landscape mode at that point.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob ­ Boner
Member
90 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2005
     
Apr 30, 2010 11:20 |  #8

Number 2 is my favorite. I would crop it so that the sky occupies only about 1/3 or less of the frame. As others have suggested, I would lighten everything except the sky. You could do this with layers in photo shop. Other PP software probably has similar options for selective lightening and darkening.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Morlow
Goldmember
Avatar
2,824 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Yellowstone National Park
     
Apr 30, 2010 14:50 |  #9

#1 is my favorite. Really works for me.


Chris Knapp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,396 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
amateur photographer, CC please!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2034 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.