KAS Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Niagara Region, Canada More info | May 03, 2010 15:35 | #1 This weekend, I shot an engagement session for a wedding I'm covering next summer. These two were absolutely a priviledge to work with, and I'm pretty happy with the results (these are some of my favourites)...but obviously I'd like to hear what you guys think!  2.  3.  4.  5.  6.  7.  8.  Thanks! 1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RedTiePhotography Goldmember  3,575 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Diego More info | May 03, 2010 16:21 | #2 You deffinately have a feel to them, but I am personally not too fond of the processing. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2010 17:09 | #3 although im a fan of the flare and the washed out desaturated look i think you went a little overboard on these... "You know an odd feeling? Sitting on the toilet eating a chocolate candy bar."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auroraskye Goldmember  2,445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Plano, TX More info | May 03, 2010 19:04 | #4 Are you a big fan of Simply Bloom Photography? lol. I think as a whole the shots are okay but I agree the processing is too much. I do really like the composition of the last shot though, very pretty. I am super cool n' stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nmura Senior Member 732 posts Likes: 122 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Hawaii More info | May 03, 2010 19:17 | #5 I like your idea, but agree with others, it's a little overdone. Number 8 looks about right.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dche5390 Senior Member  714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | May 03, 2010 20:16 | #6 Unfortunately way too much of the essential detail is lost with flaring. That said, someone needs to teach me how to do that!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2010 20:18 | #7 go on cs4 and add an overlay layer, mess around with the opacity, until you reach a desire contrast. "You know an odd feeling? Sitting on the toilet eating a chocolate candy bar."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ieatstars Goldmember  More info | May 03, 2010 20:39 | #8 These are really pretty! I do agree that the processing is a bit overdone, but I love them nonetheless. Great work! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhuongMy704 Senior Member 382 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 More info | May 03, 2010 22:10 | #9 i actually love your pp a lot.. love the last shot . awesome !! keep up the good work !! =) Www.facebook.com/PhuongMyPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2010 22:55 | #10 hope you dont mind but i took the liberty to salvage some of the detail in these beautiful pics.
"You know an odd feeling? Sitting on the toilet eating a chocolate candy bar."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FamilyJules Goldmember  3,104 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Southern California More info | May 03, 2010 22:58 | #11 See, the thing about processing is it's a personal taste..... For you, it prolly works, for others, it might be a bit much....but I think if it's your style, stick with it. I am personally diggin' the PP, but I'm a fan of flared/ vintage style shots (I'm trying to master the process, myself) *Jules* Gear: 2 x 7D| 40D | 2 x 17-55 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 70-200 2.8 IS |28-135 IS | 3 x 580EX II | www.JulieWilsonPhotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kalahmarie Senior Member  263 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Denton, TX More info | May 03, 2010 23:42 | #12 I love the processing. I agree that I would also supply them with other edits as well, but I love this processing. The last one is my favorite! I also love #4 Kalah
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2010 09:38 | #13 Thanks everyone for the feedback and comments! 1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2010 09:41 | #14 k-style wrote in post #10116517  hope you dont mind but i took the liberty to salvage some of the detail in these beautiful pics. Thank you for your interpretation. As mentioned above, it is a matter of taste. I can see that you have regained some of the mid/shadow detail, but my personal preference (i.e., taste) is to leave it brighter. It just "feels" dark to me. Again, matter of taste; the couple always gets a mix of pp styles from which to choose. 1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2010 09:42 | #15 auroraskye wrote in post #10115240 Are you a big fan of Simply Bloom Photography? lol. I think as a whole the shots are okay but I agree the processing is too much. I do really like the composition of the last shot though, very pretty. 1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1099 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
