I know that the 70-200 f/4L IS has better IS performance then the 2.8 IS mark I. Anyone compare it with the 70-200 2.8 L IS MarkII?
nonick Goldmember 1,588 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: NYC More info | May 03, 2010 21:40 | #1 I know that the 70-200 f/4L IS has better IS performance then the 2.8 IS mark I. Anyone compare it with the 70-200 2.8 L IS MarkII? Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
matrix311 Senior Member  529 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Laveen, AZ More info | May 03, 2010 21:43 | #2 not yet. Eric Schlaht - Phoenix Arizona Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yaamon Goldmember 1,435 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Markham, Ontario More info |
MHO Goldmember  1,406 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Kingston, Surrey More info | May 04, 2010 06:46 | #4 It should be exactly the same. MHO Photography on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 05, 2010 00:10 | #5 Really exactly the same? anyone had real experience can share some ideas? Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | May 05, 2010 00:14 | #6 Its anyone's guess, but by all means it should be as good or better than the f/4L IS's IS. It might even have the tri-axial IS found in the 100mm f/2.8L IS. Funny no one's brought that up. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1389 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
- 