Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 04 May 2010 (Tuesday) 12:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

white balance vs. exposure compensation

 
timconnelly
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 04, 2010 12:35 |  #1

...I've been searching the forum, reading as much as possible.....maybe I'm a little dense, but I'm more confused than ever. If I custom white balance with a grey card, am I balancing out the color (based on the color of the light being used), or am I setting an exposure compensation? I'm having a hard time with these concepts, and using the histogram for white balancing, etc. Any help would be more than appreciated!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
May 04, 2010 12:37 |  #2

balancing out the color (based on the color of the light being used)

To be honest though, it kind of baffles me that a white piece of paper can be used if a grey card is not available. I guess it is because they both have the same cast.

timconnelly wrote in post #10119859 (external link)
...I've been searching the forum, reading as much as possible.....maybe I'm a little dense, but I'm more confused than ever. If I custom white balance with a grey card, am I balancing out the color (based on the color of the light being used), or am I setting an exposure compensation? I'm having a hard time with these concepts, and using the histogram for white balancing, etc. Any help would be more than appreciated!


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timconnelly
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 04, 2010 12:52 |  #3

....that's what confuses me so much.....if I use an 18% grey card for white balancing, which is balancing out the color for the setting, then why do so many posts mention that the grey card is used for adjusting the exposure?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
May 04, 2010 13:01 |  #4

For setting white balance you need something that is neutral. IOW, something that if you look at the RGB values they are all teh same. It doesn't matter if the RGB values are all 0 (aka black) all 255 (aka white) or some variation of gray that falls between. Note that a white piece of paper is often NOT a good choice because they are rarely a true white.

For exposure, the camera's metering system assumes that for any given scene the average of all colors in that scene will be about the same as 18% gray. There are plenty of threads about this, but a good example is taking a picture outdoors in the snow. The scene is very white but the camera will assume that it is supposed to be 18% gray and underexpose the shot so that the snow looks gray. If you were to hold a gray card in front of the camera while metering and then take a shot of the snow then the camera will have the correct exposure and make the snow look white.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bieber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,992 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
May 04, 2010 13:03 |  #5

hairy_moth wrote in post #10119871 (external link)
balancing out the color (based on the color of the light being used)

To be honest though, it kind of baffles me that a white piece of paper can be used if a grey card is not available. I guess it is because they both have the same cast.

Any color-neutral item will do. White is grey, just the brightest shade of it ;)

timconnelly wrote in post #10119964 (external link)
....that's what confuses me so much.....if I use an 18% grey card for white balancing, which is balancing out the color for the setting, then why do so many posts mention that the grey card is used for adjusting the exposure?

You can use it for both. A grey card's neutral color makes it useful for white balance, but you could also use it to set your exposure by lining it up where you want it on the histogram.


EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
Nifty fifty, EF 28mm f/2.8, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Speedlights SB-25/SB-26/580EX, Pocket Wizards and such
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
May 04, 2010 13:03 |  #6

As I understand it, the meter is trying to optimize the exposure for an amount of light that is similar to what is reflected from an 18% gray card. A google search will provide better explantions than mine.. this site goes into it.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Gr​ay-Card-Review.aspx (external link)

I wish I had had one when I photographed a steam engine recently. The engine was flat black and grimy (very dark). It was a bright sunny day and there was a lot of bright white steam coming off of the engine. The range of reflected light may have been beyond what my camera could capture; my shots either had the engine exposed properly with a completely white (blown) sky and the steam invisible in the white sky, or the sky was blue, the steam white and the engine was just a big black blob.

timconnelly wrote in post #10119964 (external link)
....that's what confuses me so much.....if I use an 18% grey card for white balancing, which is balancing out the color for the setting, then why do so many posts mention that the grey card is used for adjusting the exposure?


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timconnelly
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 04, 2010 13:24 as a reply to  @ hairy_moth's post |  #7

.....thanks, really helpful replys...I think I'm beginning to get it....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,103 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
white balance vs. exposure compensation
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2862 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.