Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 04 May 2010 (Tuesday) 17:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Stars stars stars

 
Fenster
Senior Member
Avatar
500 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Purgatory
     
May 04, 2010 17:00 |  #1

I'm still dabbling with settings and processing. Opinions? :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Misadventures at 720nm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CaptainTonus
Goldmember
Avatar
1,389 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA.
     
May 04, 2010 17:14 |  #2

Looks cool, but in my opinion star shots of any kind are always better when you can see some landscape in the photo, it just frames it better and gives you a better depth. Just my 2 cents.


5D Mk2 + BG-E6 | Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L | Canon EF 70-210 f/3.5-4.5 USM | 580EX II | Manfrotto 3021N/3030/RC2 | B+W Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zeldaboy101
Member
78 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
May 04, 2010 19:13 |  #3

Nice job! You don't always need landscape, it's all about the stars and the astro people especially could care less about seeing some earth in the shot.

A few things to work on in processing:

1st and 2nd photos - Your stars a very blue and there are a lot of teal stars, you've got too much blue and green in your white point and need to add more red to the white end. The bottom left of the 1st and bottom center of the 2nd are brighter than the rest, see if a little curves can flatten some of the background out more.

3rd one - Very nice, the background is pretty green, try lowing the green in curves and raise the blue and red in the blacker area to make the background more black and less green. The far right has some distortion to the stars, likely a lens or trailing issue, use a little clone stamp and shorten the stars to make them appear more round. Focus is very good on this one!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wizcreations
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Brevard County, FL, United States
     
May 04, 2010 21:12 |  #4

I think the first 2 would look awesome if there were some tree silhouettes or something along the edges, like if it was taken from the ground of a low-density forest. Still, good job!


My Gear / Feedback
Flickr (external link) / Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ Harp
Senior Member
Avatar
606 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Iowa
     
May 04, 2010 21:20 |  #5

I've done plenty of star shootin. Sometimes, just the beauty and symmetry of the stars is all one needs.
And certainly there's a time and place to include an earthly prop.


Canon 5D Classic, 30D, 50D, (all gripped) Ef 50mm f/1.4, EF-S 10-22mm, EF 17-40mm F/4 L, EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II, EF 300mm f/4 L IS, 1.4x ii TC, Canon 500D, Smith-Victor CF300 Carbon Fiber Tripod,BH5 ball head, Manfrotto Neotec Tripod, Manfrotto 322RC2 head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,494 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
     
May 04, 2010 21:27 |  #6

nice




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CaptainTonus
Goldmember
Avatar
1,389 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA.
     
May 05, 2010 00:14 |  #7

zeldaboy101 wrote in post #10122202 (external link)
You don't always need landscape, it's all about the stars and the astro people especially could care less about seeing some earth in the shot.

I would agree with this 100% if one was taking a picture of a specific star and/or constellation or some other celestial object, but I feel like it helps the photo a lot to have landscape in it if you're taking a picture of the entire sky. That's just my opinion. I'm not an astrophotographer by any means.


5D Mk2 + BG-E6 | Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L | Canon EF 70-210 f/3.5-4.5 USM | 580EX II | Manfrotto 3021N/3030/RC2 | B+W Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zeldaboy101
Member
78 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
May 05, 2010 06:20 |  #8

CaptainTonus wrote in post #10123808 (external link)
I would agree with this 100% if one was taking a picture of a specific star and/or constellation or some other celestial object, but I feel like it helps the photo a lot to have landscape in it if you're taking a picture of the entire sky. That's just my opinion. I'm not an astrophotographer by any means.

It all comes down to what you're used to, I try to have as little earth as possible in most of my widefield shots like these because i'm trying to catch as much of the constellations and/or milky way as possible. Start with astrophotography i'm more astro oriented, and you guys starting with regular photography would be more inclined to use more landscape.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
May 06, 2010 09:58 |  #9

Nice, but I agree they all look a little blue...but blue's a nice colour so it's not a bad thing!

And I also say that a little landscape in some astro shots can improve the image, and for me, with star trails, I always try to get some landscape in there. I personally feel it gives more of a sense of us being on a giant, rotating ball. :)


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 06, 2010 10:22 |  #10

I like them all, but have to agree about the blue as well. Typically you should see other colors such as yellows and reds as well.

What lens did you use?
Looks like it could be CA, and, the star trails are exaggerating it.

As for having any landscape in the images, that completely up to you. But for most astrophotography you want to avoid it and only capture the sky.
With that said, when I shoot wide field star trail or star scape images I'll have some trees in there. Partly because I have no choice where I live, and I also use those same star trail frames for time lapse animations, and, the trees give the animation more dimension and depth when you can watch the stars move behind the trees. However, I will aim the camera high enough so I don't have man made structures such as my house or my neighbors. That's also to aim higher than most of the sky glow.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,703 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Stars stars stars
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1545 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.