![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
Please tell me what you think!!! Thanks!!!
Nocturnal151 Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Topeka KS More info | May 04, 2010 21:51 | #1
Please tell me what you think!!! Thanks!!! Canon T1i / 18-55mm / 55-250mm nifty 250 / 50mm f1.8 / Cheap ass tripod / eyefi 8gb pro x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin ![]() 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | May 04, 2010 23:15 | #2 I think your first photo is TOO LARGE you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dr.alshatti Member 71 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | May 05, 2010 07:01 | #3 ok .. nice pics ..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GorgeShooter Goldmember ![]() 1,422 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Oregon More info | May 05, 2010 09:38 | #4 I'd rather see a bit more context (albeit out of focus) meaning more blurred background. The first one especially is really an in-your-face flower. 1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoftlySpoken Member 51 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA, USA More info | May 05, 2010 11:30 | #5 I do like macro photography and #1 had great potential. I wish the "well" portion of the middle yellow-orange trio of petals had been the focal point. 40D | Tamron 17 - 50 | Canon 50 1.4 | Sigma "Big Ma" 50 - 500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturepages Goldmember ![]() 1,267 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Montana More info | May 05, 2010 13:55 | #6 the more I look at #1 the more I like it...it would make a great wallpaper. *~~I find.....the more I learn about photography, the more there is to learn about photography.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mihait Senior Member 313 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: NYC More info | May 05, 2010 14:03 | #7 i agree with the above -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember ![]() 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | May 05, 2010 17:49 | #8 Abandoned thread due to unfeasibly large waiting time for image to drop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
glockamole Member 244 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Ohio More info | May 06, 2010 10:45 | #9 Was the second one really shot at F1.8?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is sinonaut 841 guests, 165 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |