am I the only one who thinks that for some magical reason sandisk is better than the rest even though there are other respectable brands with good price values?
spb Senior Member 583 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: NH More info | May 04, 2010 22:37 | #1 am I the only one who thinks that for some magical reason sandisk is better than the rest even though there are other respectable brands with good price values? 60d | 50d | grip | 11-16 2.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 24-105 | 70-200 II | 60 macro | 580EXII x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2010 22:41 | #2 Yes...I've used a few other brands and they always get corrupted. I've been using only Sandisk for a good 3 or 4 years now without a problem. Everyday use: 7D2, 1.4x v3 Canon TC (sometimes the 2x v2 Canon TC), Canon 500mm f4 L IS USM; 6D, 24-105L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2010 22:47 | #3 I've had a couple of bad Sandisk cards. To Sandisk's credit, they replaced them VERY quickly and without any hassle whatsoever. I'm using Sandisk, Lexar and Transcend now. -- Don Fuller --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
waynethegiant Senior Member 324 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: SoCal More info | May 04, 2010 23:13 | #4 transcend has been good to me for value and quality. Kingston, i no longer trust. But i always check reviews online before i buy. I wouldn't mind having a few sandisks but Transcends are just cheaper and i've haven't had a problem so far Canon EOS 5D Mark II + BG-E6 Battery Grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shellback Member 119 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Fort Wayne IN USA More info | May 04, 2010 23:27 | #5 I've used Transcends for a couple of years now with no problems. Never had a problem with Sandisk either but I did have one Lexar go bad not too long after I bought it, they replaced it for me. Somewhere between Woebegone and Faraway.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfnz Member 105 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | May 05, 2010 00:05 | #6 Of all the cards I've used the only one to fail on me was a SanDisk, the replacement works fine so I'll let them off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 05, 2010 00:07 | #7 spb wrote in post #10123276 am I the only one who thinks that for some magical reason sandisk is better than the rest even though there are other respectable brands with good price values? i've always used only sandisk and i've never had a problem. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SOK Goldmember 1,592 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Gold Coast, Australia More info | May 05, 2010 00:10 | #8 Definitely not the only one... Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xMClass Goldmember 2,203 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: California More info | May 05, 2010 03:41 | #9 All Sandisk all the time. -Mikey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photoPanda Senior Member 616 posts Joined May 2010 Location: East Coast More info | May 05, 2010 03:49 | #10 I only buy Sandisk. Dad insists on buying unheard-of brands of SD/CF card and regularly has them fail. I'm quite content sticking with a brand that seems to have a pretty good track record.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lannes Goldmember 4,370 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Perth, Australia More info | I'm even more obsessed, I only use one type of Sanidisk CF card, The Ducati special edition. 1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BBrat Goldmember 1,601 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: West of Boston, MA. USA More info | sandisk and lexar, but sandisk is my first choice. never had a problem Brian Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | May 05, 2010 06:59 | #13 spb wrote in post #10123276 am I the only one who thinks that for some magical reason sandisk is better than the rest even though there are other respectable brands with good price values? I primarily use Transcend and about 20,000 shots later, I still use Transcend although I did get some of the new Sandisk cards because they were cheaper than the equivalent Transcend. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkspook Goldmember 1,058 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: The Land of Pork and Taxes More info |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | May 05, 2010 10:18 | #15 I think they all have potential for failures, but I do think Sandisks fail A LOT less than others. When it comes to my pictures I only want to trust them to the best. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2692 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||