Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 May 2010 (Wednesday) 14:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How does this person get rid of lens flare like this?

 
Striff
Member
Avatar
110 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: San Diego
     
May 05, 2010 14:07 |  #1

Becker posted some of his before and afters and I was curious how you guys think he did this?

Here is the before

http://www.thebecker.c​om/bna/16.JPG (external link)

Here is the after

http://www.thebecker.c​om/bna/15.JPG (external link)


http://photosbycody.co​m/ (external link)My Blog (external link) | http://photosbycody.co​m/ (external link) | Follow me on Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
May 05, 2010 14:17 |  #2

Not sure exactly but I would think it took some work with selections, several layers and hue saturation for starters. I have had some lens flare as bad as this and it is alot of work.

You do know you aren't supposed to post others work. Provide the link only.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tarzanman
Senior Member
548 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
May 05, 2010 14:21 |  #3

Saturation, contrast, vibrance, lightness.... maybe even curves (though I don't think messing with the curves or levels would have been necessary for the example you gave). There are more than a couple things to try that would probably give you decent results for the above example

Play around with each of those on adjustment layers and see what you can come up with. Even the exposure slider would probably go a good ways if you were inclined to layer the image




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
May 05, 2010 14:22 |  #4

It's easily done by correcting the levels then applying a shallow S curve. It can be done way batter than they did as well. 2 minutes work at most.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
May 05, 2010 14:23 |  #5

Just hit "Auto Level" and it gets you most of the way there.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
May 05, 2010 14:23 |  #6

Unless the EXIF says otherwise, It's quite possible the After is actually the Before.

Lot easier to add a tinted veil than remove that much flare! ;)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
May 05, 2010 14:31 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #10127253 (external link)
Just hit "Auto Level" and it gets you most of the way there.

Really don't. Auto Levels is a horrible thing. Learn to do it manually, it's not hard and the results are much better.

Anyway, Levels gets you from this...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


... to this ...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I had to doctor the original to simulate flare to begin with as I'd never expose so badly ;)

My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sue.t
Goldmember
Avatar
1,172 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 196
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, Canada
     
May 05, 2010 17:00 |  #8

If Autolevels over does it, you can immediately use the Fade command to adjust the strength of the effect until it appears more reasonable.

Many commands in Photoshop can be faded immediately after the command has been completed -- maybe 50% of the correction would make a better result.


-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tiberius
Goldmember
Avatar
2,556 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 05, 2010 17:20 |  #9

You can also duplicate the layer and run autolevels on that. Whereas fade only works immediately after you use the command, you can adjust the opacity of a duplicate layer at any time.


My photography website!PHOCAL PHOTOGRAPHY (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
May 05, 2010 18:09 as a reply to  @ Tiberius's post |  #10

I just tried it and used auto levels then added a bit of contrast using curves. Finished with a bit of color correction for the gray point. Looks fine.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,609 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
How does this person get rid of lens flare like this?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
469 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.