Becker posted some of his before and afters and I was curious how you guys think he did this?
Here is the before
http://www.thebecker.com/bna/16.JPG![]()
Here is the after
http://www.thebecker.com/bna/15.JPG![]()
Striff Member 110 posts Joined May 2006 Location: San Diego More info | May 05, 2010 14:07 | #1 Becker posted some of his before and afters and I was curious how you guys think he did this? http://photosbycody.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005 10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | May 05, 2010 14:17 | #2 Not sure exactly but I would think it took some work with selections, several layers and hue saturation for starters. I have had some lens flare as bad as this and it is alot of work. My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tarzanman Senior Member 548 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | May 05, 2010 14:21 | #3 Saturation, contrast, vibrance, lightness.... maybe even curves (though I don't think messing with the curves or levels would have been necessary for the example you gave). There are more than a couple things to try that would probably give you decent results for the above example
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HankScorpio Goldmember 2,700 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: England, baby! More info | May 05, 2010 14:22 | #4 It's easily done by correcting the levels then applying a shallow S curve. It can be done way batter than they did as well. 2 minutes work at most. My collection of boxes with holes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | May 05, 2010 14:23 | #5 Just hit "Auto Level" and it gets you most of the way there. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | May 05, 2010 14:23 | #6 Unless the EXIF says otherwise, It's quite possible the After is actually the Before. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HankScorpio Goldmember 2,700 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: England, baby! More info | May 05, 2010 14:31 | #7 gjl711 wrote in post #10127253 Just hit "Auto Level" and it gets you most of the way there. Really don't. Auto Levels is a horrible thing. Learn to do it manually, it's not hard and the results are much better.
... to this ...
I had to doctor the original to simulate flare to begin with as I'd never expose so badly ![]() My collection of boxes with holes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 05, 2010 17:00 | #8 If Autolevels over does it, you can immediately use the Fade command to adjust the strength of the effect until it appears more reasonable. -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tiberius Goldmember 2,556 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 05, 2010 17:20 | #9 You can also duplicate the layer and run autolevels on that. Whereas fade only works immediately after you use the command, you can adjust the opacity of a duplicate layer at any time. My photography website!PHOCAL PHOTOGRAPHY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info | I just tried it and used auto levels then added a bit of contrast using curves. Finished with a bit of color correction for the gray point. Looks fine. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 469 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||