Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 06 May 2010 (Thursday) 03:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First model

 
Staszek
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
May 06, 2010 03:37 |  #1

Luckily she's my girlfriend so she puts up with me :D I shot these in Raw + JPEG but am having a hell of a time figuring out how to work Raw and make it pop. Please give me feedback about these photos.

Shot with my T1i and EF 50 f/1.4.

#1

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4019/4583718360_85d6b3e3fc_b.jpg

#2
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4013/4583716442_d6412d13d2_b.jpg

#3
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4061/4583086453_79ab71f1a4_b.jpg

#4
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4064/4583087043_b03cb043ce_b.jpg

#5
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4014/4583087435_b968d0c730_b.jpg

#6
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4042/4583715414_667146a46f_b.jpg

SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
35mmNewbie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,127 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Coconut Creek, Florida
     
May 06, 2010 03:39 |  #2

I'll give it a try im new still pretty new to this haha; Try not to cut off her hand, top of her head and hair.


Bryan
20D; 70-200 f4; YN-560; Genesis 200 Strobe w/ 43" Umbrella; 43" 5 in 1 Reflector;

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darvon
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
May 06, 2010 05:15 |  #3

She is a very pretty lady and your captures are nice. You mentioned you want to make them pop... it's all in the eyes. If you look at the first and the second, there is no light in the eyes and they look dull (not the subject, just the eyes). Put light in the eyes - either with fill flash or in photoshop. I played around with the first image and in a couple minutes made it "pop" a little more to me. Didn't post it because you don't have "image editing ok" marked, but if you would like to see a small example let me know.

D


My Flickr (external link)
DonnellyImages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kent ­ andersen
Goldmember
1,071 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Norway, Kristiansand
     
May 06, 2010 06:26 |  #4

You have some great shots here.

They all look like pictures that was taken underexposed (on the face), and that you made that part of the picture brighter in PP. To get the exposure right is easier if you avoid direct sun light. Try to take pictures in the shadows, where the difference between the brightest and darkest part of the picture are much less. Direct sunlight gives an harsh contrast, with very dark areas and very bright areas. Wich means, you easily get both over and underexposure in the same picture.

To get good image quality on a portrait in direct sunlight is one of the most diffucult challenges you can pick. Search out shadows instead, and you will get an easier task. Everything will then be more balanced and also pop up better.

I would also recomend you to think about how to get the picture sharper. Was the exposure to slow? Then you are in risk of both getting motion blur becouse the girl moves, and blur becouse you move. Choose a more than 200 and you will get better results. To take pictures with f1.4 is also more difficult, you are then having a very small area that will be sharp. Start to use as much as possible untill you get the picture perfectly sharp, then start to experiment more with 1.4.


Living in Austria, I am so glad that there is stuff like Gimp out there...
I am a happy giver, so if you find any misspelling in my text, you can keep them... :)
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/41388512@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
May 06, 2010 09:26 |  #5

Darvon wrote in post #10131014 (external link)
She is a very pretty lady and your captures are nice. You mentioned you want to make them pop... it's all in the eyes. If you look at the first and the second, there is no light in the eyes and they look dull (not the subject, just the eyes). Put light in the eyes - either with fill flash or in photoshop. I played around with the first image and in a couple minutes made it "pop" a little more to me. Didn't post it because you don't have "image editing ok" marked, but if you would like to see a small example let me know.

D

I see what you're saying. I don't have a fill flash or photoshop, so that might be a problem :lol: Can the fill flash come from the popup flash or would that cause the photos to become dull?

Also, I changed my settings so please post your edit. I'd love to see what you did with it.

kent andersen wrote in post #10131187 (external link)
You have some great shots here.

They all look like pictures that was taken underexposed (on the face), and that you made that part of the picture brighter in PP. To get the exposure right is easier if you avoid direct sun light. Try to take pictures in the shadows, where the difference between the brightest and darkest part of the picture are much less. Direct sunlight gives an harsh contrast, with very dark areas and very bright areas. Wich means, you easily get both over and underexposure in the same picture.

To get good image quality on a portrait in direct sunlight is one of the most diffucult challenges you can pick. Search out shadows instead, and you will get an easier task. Everything will then be more balanced and also pop up better.

I would also recomend you to think about how to get the picture sharper. Was the exposure to slow? Then you are in risk of both getting motion blur becouse the girl moves, and blur becouse you move. Choose a more than 200 and you will get better results. To take pictures with f1.4 is also more difficult, you are then having a very small area that will be sharp. Start to use as much as possible untill you get the picture perfectly sharp, then start to experiment more with 1.4.

No PP here (see above comment). Notes taken on the sunlight. These were taken at about 7pm last night and the sun was much higher than I expected. Next time I will find some trees and report back.

The exposure was not slow on these shots. I was shooting ISO 100 and f/2.8 for the outdoor shots, so the shutter speed was well over 1/500. The shot with the red background was in a parking garage after dinner. ISO 1600, f/2, 1/125 (I chose f/2 for the lack of light).

I selected the focus points manually and picked one one either eye. You suggest I use a deeper DOF to get her face sharper instead of just the eyes? Would that be somewhere around f/4 or even less? I'm just trying to get an idea of what a subtle change in aperture can make.


Notes taken:
1. Don't cut off fingers
2. Shoot in the shade
3. Fill flash
4. Stop down for sharpness


Thanks for the feedback so far!


SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Morto
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2008
     
May 06, 2010 10:36 |  #6

Nice pictures Staszek. If photoshop is something you don't want to spend too much money on right now, then try to download Gimp. The functions are pretty similar to photoshop, and it's free. #5 would be better if the crop was a little better, just like the above comment say, don't cut off the fingers. The pop up flash would be fine for fill flash, the only thing is, with subject close, the flash might be a little too bright. I took a some pictures before using the pop up as fill with my 50mm 1.4, and the subject were a little too bright.

Over all, nice pictures. Keep shooting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dwarrenr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,650 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Fairland, Indiana
     
May 06, 2010 11:39 |  #7

Beautiful girl. I played a little bit with the second image. Lightened the eyes and removed some of her 'imperfections' if you want to call them that. Also closed her lips, the small amount of teeth showing was a distraction. I did not play around with the balance or color at all. Those are all nice shots. Keep up the good work.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

D. Warren Robison
"All guys feel the need to compensate. Most compensate with sports cars. I compensate with a 400mm 2.8"
Flickr (external link) - Home Page (external link) - MaxPreps Gallery - (external link)Razzi (external link)
Equipment List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darvon
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
May 08, 2010 03:49 |  #8

Staszek wrote in post #10131915 (external link)
I see what you're saying. I don't have a fill flash or photoshop, so that might be a problem :lol: Can the fill flash come from the popup flash or would that cause the photos to become dull?

Also, I changed my settings so please post your edit. I'd love to see what you did with it.

I think flash off the camera i.e. the pop-up, kills the photos. Here is a 3 minute edit. Needs a little white balancing, but was more interested in giving the eyes some life:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

My Flickr (external link)
DonnellyImages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yaamon
Goldmember
1,435 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Markham, Ontario
     
May 08, 2010 10:50 as a reply to  @ Darvon's post |  #9

Your girlfriend is a attractive person and great to have her model for you. She got nice eyes.

I like the 3rd photo and the pose in the 5th but might be better if she would turn her head slightly towards with a smile. :)

Image 1105 from your web site is a good photo.
http://www.flickr.com …s/s_olszewski/4​583087947/ (external link)


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,682 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
First model
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1066 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.