Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #10139285
Ok, I'm at work and have enlisted my co-worker here to help me understand this, and here is the first thing I was asked when I read the replies to her--on the ratio, 2:3 ie, two what to three what? What is being used in the comparison? My answer was length to height. but honestly, I don't even know why I said that.

An aspect ratio is simply boiling down dimensions to the simplest denominators. It isn't comparing width to height specifically, although you can express it that way if it suits you.
So, a 2:3 aspect ratio (some people boil it down further to "1.5" or 1:1.5) simply means that the longer dimention of your image is 1.5x the shorter dimension. This is the "native" aspect ratio of your DSLR. To figure exactly matching print sizes you just do the math and it will apply whether your picture is in "landscape" or "portrait" orientation. So, a 2:3 image will print a "full bleed" 4x6, 8x12, 12x18 and so on.
What you find, though, is that common print sizes don't have on standard aspect ratio. So you see the 8x10 size a lot, meaning you have to crop your original from an 8x12/2:3 aspect ratio to the 4:5 aspect ratio for the 8x10. Again, portrait and landscape orientation both work the same -- you crop off the longer side.
Aside from not getting the ratio thing, how on earth do you even save an image as a final product since you have no idea what sizes the client may want the prints in? A client goes online to look at their proof gallery, they want a 5x7 of these and 4x6s of those and an 11x14 of this one---how do you factor in all the choices they can make?
This is one of the challenges -- how do you delever a shot to a client who may want prints in different sizes? The easiest thing for you is to give them the full-sized files with the disclaimer that they need to have the file properly cropped for the specific print they want.
There are some print sizes that are pretty close in aspect ratio and may do OK with just a print cropped by the printer -- the 4x6 and the 5x7 prints are an example -- a little is cropped from the long dimension but not a lot. In this case, you could just trust the automated process if you have space on both ends to crop without messing up the image. An 8x10, though, takes considerably more off the ends and so would really need you or your client to crop ahead of time.
This all doesn't need to be confusing, once you get the idea and know what you need to do. It is a task, though, to individually crop an image to fit a particular print size/aspect ratio, but I'd rather do that myself than trust an automatic print process that doesn't give a whit about chopping the tops off of a subject's head!