Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 May 2010 (Friday) 11:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DO NOT read this if you can't promise not to laugh-print size question

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 07, 2010 12:59 |  #16

hairy_moth wrote in post #10139339 (external link)
Most of the photo editing tools that I have used have a crop feature that allows you to choose the aspect ratio of the crop (e.g., 8x10, 5x7). If you use this, it will guarantee that your resulting image is in the right shape. Use that feature so that you can choose the crop, not the printer's computer.

Sounds like this is the answer to my question about sizing it in Photoshop, right? But, using this method, every time you get a print order you'd have to open PS, do this to the original, save it, then upload that image to the printer? That's not a real problem for me right now, considering the bleakly small amount of printing I've had to do thus far, but what about when I (not IF I!) get busier? I guess when filling a print order, I could just see which images were not acceptable using the original, and resize just those...


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 07, 2010 13:47 |  #17

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #10139503 (external link)
Sounds like this is the answer to my question about sizing it in Photoshop, right? But, using this method, every time you get a print order you'd have to open PS, do this to the original, save it, then upload that image to the printer? That's not a real problem for me right now, considering the bleakly small amount of printing I've had to do thus far, but what about when I (not IF I!) get busier? I guess when filling a print order, I could just see which images were not acceptable using the original, and resize just those...

Sure, something like that -- if you get a request for a specific size, then you have to do that bit of work. Otherwise, you could look at saving versions with two or three different aspect ratios and pick the one with the least cropping needed...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 07, 2010 13:54 |  #18

sevillafox wrote in post #10139302 (external link)
You shoot to leave a little room for cropping.

+1 (x a bazillion) Alyways leave some extra room on the long axis, as thats the one that gets chopped for different crops.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
May 07, 2010 14:47 |  #19

gonzogolf wrote in post #10139851 (external link)
+1 (x a bazillion) Alyways leave some extra room on the long axis, as thats the one that gets chopped for different crops.

It would be interesting to know if the printers have a standard algorithm for cropping off the ends of pictures when the original is too long. For example, do they center it and crop equal amounts from both sides, or do they crop the bottom for portrait and the right for landscape?

I would guess they center it. Knowing this might avoid the problem all together if you were able to compose your shots with this in mind.


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 07, 2010 14:50 |  #20

gonzogolf wrote in post #10139851 (external link)
+1 (x a bazillion) Alyways leave some extra room on the long axis, as thats the one that gets chopped for different crops.

Ok I understand the reasoning behind this, but what if the extra room just doesn't have the same "oomph" as a crop (done by me) does? Does that make sense? I can see how much better an image looks cropped, and that's what I want the client to see, but how to do this & keep the extra room for cropping to a size they might later want? Seems like I am over thinking this...


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 07, 2010 14:59 |  #21

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #10140165 (external link)
Ok I understand the reasoning behind this, but what if the extra room just doesn't have the same "oomph" as a crop (done by me) does? Does that make sense? I can see how much better an image looks cropped, and that's what I want the client to see, but how to do this & keep the extra room for cropping to a size they might later want? Seems like I am over thinking this...


Shoot wide, display cropped. But if you shoot tight to improve your display ommph and they want an 8x10 and you have to cut off feet or heads then you lose. You want it to be easy, but you have to make choices. The other option is to only offer prints in the 2x3 ratio, 4x6, 5x7, 8x12, etc. But that makes the customer pay more for framing on the larger sizes as you cant get precut mats and frames for the odd sizes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 07, 2010 15:01 |  #22

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #10140165 (external link)
Ok I understand the reasoning behind this, but what if the extra room just doesn't have the same "oomph" as a crop (done by me) does? Does that make sense? I can see how much better an image looks cropped, and that's what I want the client to see, but how to do this & keep the extra room for cropping to a size they might later want? Seems like I am over thinking this...

At this point, yeah, you probably have all the info you need, and just need to sort it out on an as-needed basis. You make the "tough" decisions!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
May 07, 2010 15:07 |  #23

For people using a 7D, shooting in RAW and not using DPP as their RAW processor, I suggest setting the camera's aspect ratio to be 4:5. This makes no difference to the resulting image but it adds a pair of blue bars in LiveView and when chimping that show where the image would be cut off to do an 8x10 print. 8x10 seems to be the most common print format and doing this really helps when composing the shots out in the field.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 07, 2010 16:07 |  #24

krb wrote in post #10140252 (external link)
For people using a 7D, shooting in RAW and not using DPP as their RAW processor, I suggest setting the camera's aspect ratio to be 4:5. This makes no difference to the resulting image but it adds a pair of blue bars in LiveView and when chimping that show where the image would be cut off to do an 8x10 print. 8x10 seems to be the most common print format and doing this really helps when composing the shots out in the field.

Does the 5D MKII have this feature also? The 7D is actually my husband's. I rarely use it.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
May 07, 2010 16:12 |  #25

Don't have a 5D so I don't know.

On the 7D this value is set in "C.Fn IV:Operation/Others Add aspect ratio information" so that may be a good place to start looking.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 07, 2010 16:19 |  #26

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #10140597 (external link)
Does the 5D MKII have this feature also? The 7D is actually my husband's. I rarely use it.

If it doesnt, get a bit of masking tape and make your own on the review screen. But honestly it shouldnt be that hard to just imagine your own cropping guide. Open an image in photoshop, use the crop tool set to 8x10, or 10x8 and apply it, notice how much you lose. It becomes second nature.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Thompson
Goldmember
Avatar
4,063 posts
Likes: 423
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
May 07, 2010 16:34 |  #27

gonzogolf wrote in post #10140655 (external link)
Open an image in photoshop, use the crop tool set to 8x10, or 10x8 and apply it, notice how much you lose. It becomes second nature.

Exactly. It doesn't take long to get used to.


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 07, 2010 16:37 |  #28

D Thompson wrote in post #10140733 (external link)
Exactly. It doesn't take long to get used to.

Here is a quick visual. As you can see, as long as you print a 4x6, 8x12, or 12x18 you don't have to crop. For an 8x10 you lose a little off the bottom. The difference from a 8x10 to a 5x7 is a little off the sides.

Hope this helps a little.

My only quibble with your diagram is the 5x7 line doesnt have to be so small a portion of the frame




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 07, 2010 16:39 |  #29

Dennis, your grahic gives somewhat of an off perspective on the 5x7 as far as the aspect ratio part of things -- the proportions of the 5x7 are much closer to the 2:3 than the 4:5 proportions are.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Thompson
Goldmember
Avatar
4,063 posts
Likes: 423
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
May 07, 2010 16:46 |  #30

gonzogolf wrote in post #10140743 (external link)
My only quibble with your diagram is the 5x7 line doesnt have to be so small a portion of the frame

tonylong wrote in post #10140753 (external link)
Dennis, your grahic gives somewhat of an off perspective on the 5x7 as far as the aspect ratio part of things -- the proportions of the 5x7 are much closer to the 2:3 than the 4:5 proportions are.

Back to the drawing board later tonight :(. Yeah, looking at it I realized I set the 5x7 from the 8x10 crop instead of the full.


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,041 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
DO NOT read this if you can't promise not to laugh-print size question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2152 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.