Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 07 May 2010 (Friday) 18:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The Killer Camera Canon won't make.

 
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 85
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
May 07, 2010 18:13 |  #1

I know most people would not agree, but here goes.

Here is what I think would make the most awesome killer camera, which Canon will never make.

1. 5D like body with FF
2. 7D like AF, Flash control, and Exposure system
3. Make it 8.3M Pixels ( 3840x2160 (16x9) [This is essentially HDx2] )
4. Allow 1:1 (4MP=2160x2160), 3:2 (6.9MP=3240x2160), 4:3 (6.1MP=2880x2160) and 16:9
5. Of course it would have super low light abilities because of the Gianormous pixels.
6. Video with 1920x1080, 1280x720, Movie Crop 1920x1080(2x) and 1280x720 (~3.2x).
7. Give it 6fps.

Here's why I think this works. No need to explain FF. The 7D AF, Flash control, Exposure system will give most people what they need for landscapes as well as sports. Although you might complain about 4MP for square ratio, this would mostly be used by wedding photographers and its plenty for a wedding album. More and more HDTV's are in the home so 16x9 is a good format to shoot in, but you still have 4:3 and 3:2. Since the pixels are like a acre large it would do great at ISO25,600. Since it has HD Video and canon seems to excel at that, this would be a natural evolution.

Can you come up with a better killer camera, It does have to be somewhat affordable. Say less than $3000. No bubble gum machine or dishwasher like feature, OK!

---------------Using Cashoo suggestion of 3:2 format---------------
3840x2880 (4:3-11MP)
3840x2560 (3:2-9.8MP)
3840x2160 (16:9-8.3MP)

To make this happen it may have to be a 14MP sensor because of the unused area. Still sounds like a great way to go to me.


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cashoo
Senior Member
Avatar
276 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Scotland, Glasgow
     
May 07, 2010 18:16 |  #2

6.9MP for 3:2 is quite low, there would be no room for cropping at all.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoPanda
Senior Member
Avatar
616 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: East Coast
     
May 07, 2010 18:17 |  #3

6.9mp in the normal 2:3 format probably won't appeal to people... despite it being enough for many applications! You double those figures and you might have a winner though ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cashoo
Senior Member
Avatar
276 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Scotland, Glasgow
     
May 07, 2010 18:21 |  #4

I think the sensor should be 3:2 not 16:9 and double the resolution.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HKGuns
Goldmember
Avatar
1,773 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 1669
Joined May 2008
     
May 07, 2010 18:23 |  #5

What exactly is "killer" about that rig?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booja
Goldmember
1,638 posts
Likes: 103
Joined Jan 2008
Location: houston, tx
     
May 07, 2010 18:23 |  #6

i would like 7d AF in my 5d2... but thats pretty much the 1ds series.

i kinda like the large megapixel because i can crop the hell out of my pics. so 8mp is a but on the low end... i dont think anyone even makes anything under 10mp anymore.

i dont care for certain aspect ratios either... i can just crop it to what i need.

i pretty much want a 1ds series with video... im sure thats what the 1ds4 is gonna be. i dont like the price though... but its aimed at the high end and for pros.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richwig83
Member
174 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2009
     
May 07, 2010 18:25 |  #7

nah. do not want!

FF
40MP
10FPS
51 point AF
Zero noise at 3200ISO

WANT!


::: www.flickr.com/richwig​ley (external link) :::
Canon 5D mkII : 50mm 1.8 II : 24-105 F4 L : 100-400mm 4.5-5.6IS L 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fiebru1119
Senior Member
Avatar
718 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 74
Joined May 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
     
May 07, 2010 18:30 |  #8

sounds like the D700 minus video


A7RIII | EF15/2.8 FE | 16-35/4.0LIS | 24/1.4L II | ZA55/1.8 | 24-105G OSS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cashoo
Senior Member
Avatar
276 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Scotland, Glasgow
     
May 07, 2010 18:37 |  #9

richwig83 wrote in post #10141259 (external link)
nah. do not want!

FF
40MP
10FPS
51 point AF
Zero noise at 3200ISO

WANT!

Price: arm and a leg


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmahoney
Goldmember
Avatar
2,789 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
May 07, 2010 18:38 |  #10

fiebru1119 wrote in post #10141280 (external link)
sounds like the D700 minus video

Yep .. solid build, great AF, full frame sensor, and no built in grip. Basically all the 1 series qualities minus the extra weight & bulk.

It's the perfect camera .. if Canon ever makes it I'll buy a half-dozen of 'em. They had no problem making them in film format :rolleyes:


Newfoundland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
May 07, 2010 18:46 as a reply to  @ fiebru1119's post |  #11

Pass--Nothing than interests me here


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canis_Majoris
Member
63 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Derby, UK
     
May 07, 2010 19:03 |  #12

A half price 5DII would do me fine :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
k-lo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,316 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Lost in SN's Canon vs Nikon Thread
     
May 07, 2010 19:05 |  #13

FF
1D body
80MP
24 FPS (not movie mode but shutter speed)
Unlimited buffer
102 center point accurate focus points
100% VF + 20% peripheral views
Clean 25,600 ISO native
built in Wifi
built in secondary IS (additional 3 stops to your IS lens)
close to zero shutterlag
close to zero startup time
close to zero VF blackout
iphone type screen
water resistant to 10ft or 2 mins.
GPS tagging
All photo format export + automatic flickr, photobucket, pbase etc.. upload
All video format export + automatic facebook, vimeo and youtube upload

and of course.... automatic back up siren (for when the photographer is backing away from the subject)


-=Karlo=- 1D III, 5D Mark II, 17-40 4 L, 35 1.4 L 24-70 2.8 L, 135mm 2.0 L, 85mm 1.2 L II, 300mm f 2.8 L, 580EX II, and a crapload of Elinchrom Gear :cool:
View my flickr sets (external link)
Check out my Modelmayhem port (external link)
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Viva-photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,447 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Washington, DC
     
May 07, 2010 19:12 |  #14

A half price 5DII would do me fine

hahaha. AMEN!!! :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
May 07, 2010 19:13 |  #15

IMAGE: http://www.dphotojournal.com/wp-content/canon_xxx.jpg

FTW ;)

Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,094 views & 0 likes for this thread, 44 members have posted to it.
The Killer Camera Canon won't make.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1045 guests, 111 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.