Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 08 May 2010 (Saturday) 14:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Clients that tick you off /rant

 
Striff
Member
Avatar
110 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: San Diego
     
May 08, 2010 14:01 |  #1

So I meet with a client this morning about doing a wedding for her. I charge $1200 for a wedding. She found me on craigslist where I advertise. We talked for about half an hour and then she told me that she wanted to go with me. Great. I had a contract with me so we went over it together and signed it. I take a $400 deposit to "save the date" which is industry standard....most photographers take half.

So I leave and 10 minutes later her fiance calls me and tells me that there is no way he feels comfortable giving me $400 because asking for that much makes me look like a "scam artist". I tell him that it is industry standard. He responds and tells me that it is "illegal for me to take anything more than 10%" he then tries to give me a speach that he took buisness classes and yada yada yada. I'm trying to not burst out laughing at this point because the guy is so full of it. Then he tells me the most he is willing to give me is $100. I told him I would think about it.

So at this point I am probably going to rip up the $400 check he gave me and tell him good luck in finding a legitimate wedding photographer that will take a $100 depost on a $1200 wedding. What would you do in a situation like this?


http://photosbycody.co​m/ (external link)My Blog (external link) | http://photosbycody.co​m/ (external link) | Follow me on Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
May 08, 2010 14:06 |  #2

I'd cancel on them and return the check to them.

If they're this much of a pain in the arse just image what it'll be like later when you did not get a shot they did not tell you they wanted or insist that they have all images and not just the keepers, etc.

These people are going to be a big regret if you keep them, I am afraid.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tadaaa
Senior Member
926 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2010
     
May 08, 2010 14:16 |  #3

I'd say sure... I will tentatively reserve your wedding date for $100 with the understanding that if another customer pays the proper $400 amount to reserve their wedding for that same date you will be bumped.


- 1D & G9 & Sigma DP1 & Nikon D800 -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
images ­ by ­ Paul
Senior Member
346 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: USA
     
May 08, 2010 14:40 |  #4

Gee, I've been doing this for 25 years, taking 1/3 down (non refundable).
I've been illegal for all these years?????
Give him his check back. This is too hard a business to have to put up with excess bull.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
May 08, 2010 15:08 |  #5

agreed with the above. I'd tell them "thanks for your interest, but I don't think I'm the right photographer for you. Here is your check back. Good luck."


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
May 08, 2010 15:23 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

call it something else..i think the deposit word is what got to them.

"booking fee"

"retainer"

"date keeper fee"

? would that work?


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 08, 2010 20:59 |  #7

There in California I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't some silly deposit/retainer cap on the legislative books somewhere.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 09, 2010 02:13 |  #8

This is a warning sign that you should pay attention to. Return the cheque and wish them good luck finding a photographer.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beetcal
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Taichung, Taiwan.
     
May 09, 2010 03:34 |  #9

Agreed, wave goodbye and pass the stress on to another...if they are lucky!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
May 09, 2010 03:48 |  #10

Yup I am with Tim, you just got a great headsup for what comes next, they will want a full refund or reshoot at your cost for some perceived wrong. Bail now while you can. Otherwise cash the check and stand by your contract.

But the likely hood that the groom is a PITA is going up as we speak.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
May 09, 2010 04:26 |  #11

Never argue with people about this. Simply say "I understand you might not be comfortable with this but it is how my business has been set up..." and don't budge. Don't defend it. Don't apologize. Just state the facts. If they move on, that's fine :)

Bobby

_______________

San Diego Wedding Photographer (blog) (external link)
Twitter (external link) -- Facebook (external link)
the Raddest Photo Trip Ever!!! (external link)

Come on the next one Dec 6th-19th 2010!!!!!


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
May 09, 2010 06:23 |  #12

I don't see any need to argue and/or walk away as a next step. This is not a deposit on services that haven't been rendered yet, it's a retainer; a fee paid to guarantee their day on your calendar. If after that explanation, they're still not cool with it, then let them have their money back and move on. But it's very possible that they simply don't understand what that money is for and are failing to view it in its proper context. I also suspect they have already written large deposit checks (as opposed to retainers) to their caterer, florist, for the gown, and everything else.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
images ­ by ­ Paul
Senior Member
346 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: USA
     
May 09, 2010 08:43 |  #13

Here's how I see it. This guy is calling the fee indicative of a "scam artist" , he's taken a business course , what you are doing is illegal if you exceed 10%. If this is what you are hearing just to book the gig...what are you going to hear AFTER the wedding is over?
I would see this as a sure indication of the way everything will go. I would steer as far away from this as I could.
I have found that the clients that pay the least amount for my services want as much as they can possibly squeeze out of me. Always pushing for the next "freebee"
"You mean that wasn't included in my contract?? It should have been!! My friend got married and it was in his contract" blah, blah, blah This guy needs a "thanks but no thanks". Return his check.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
May 09, 2010 09:41 |  #14

Peacefield wrote in post #10147983 (external link)
This is not a deposit on services that haven't been rendered yet, it's a retainer; a fee paid to guarantee their day on your calendar.

Its only a retainer if the contract calls it a retainer. The law (Judge) could care less "what you meant to say". Or how you treat the situation after the money had passed hands. He will only care about the wording printed on the contract. I would take it that the OP contract says deposit at that is what he called it.

But your definition is right. Retainer services are rendered the moment the money passes. Retainers save a date/time. They are not prepayment of services to be performed at a later date. This is why they are not commonly refunded, even in court. If it is deposit on the contract spend the money to have it changed, this week!

Look at it this way...If Lawyers use the term retainer..... its good enough for us.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
May 09, 2010 09:49 |  #15

I had a bride referred through a friend. All the bells and flags were going up when I talked to her, but ignored it since my friend told me she was good to go. Should have listened to my instinct, and I've been doing this too long to even think I'd got roped into something like this one client. I actually lost money shooting her wedding, just so I don't get bad rep. through her.

The moral of the story is, listen to your instinct. There's always better people out there, or you can enjoy a weekend with your family.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,241 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Clients that tick you off /rant
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
469 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.