Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 09 May 2010 (Sunday) 02:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Red Rock Canyon in Vegas - first try

 
VegasBoz
Senior Member
373 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 09, 2010 02:41 |  #1

So I was bored tonight and figured I'd drive out to where I thought it would be dark and make an attempt at these kinds of photos. I learned some valuable lessons and hope to revisit taking these types of photos soon.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zeldaboy101
Member
78 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
May 09, 2010 10:16 |  #2

Very nice, the best time to do these shots is when the moon is behind you illuminating your landscape but not overly bright so you still get plenty of stars. If you do a lot of exposures to get more stars to show up, just use photoshop to only paint in 1 frame for the foreground so it doesn't show up as a big blur.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VegasBoz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
373 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 09, 2010 10:45 as a reply to  @ zeldaboy101's post |  #3

I started reading more last night but I'm not sure I understand the multiple exposures thing? If I'm taking multiple exposures won't the stars have moved and when I combine the exposures won't it appear as just a duplicated mass of the same stars, just in a different position? Don't answer that... I'm going to do more reading today with lots of notes and maybe go attempt the shot again.

I was only about 200 yards off the road and there were plenty of cars that would drive by and light up the landscape at times as they turned through a curve. Irritating to say the least but maybe it helped a little?

Let's not mention the wind...ohhhhh the wind.... but I'm glad I bought a solid tripod last year.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpistone
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
May 09, 2010 14:17 |  #4

Good one! DeepSkyStacker (external link)is a good tool for that, you can read through a tutorial for it to get an idea of stacking.


-Matt
40D | 10-22mm | 17-85mm IS | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 f4 | 100mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zeldaboy101
Member
78 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
May 09, 2010 17:08 |  #5

You stack it based on the stars, that way they don't move, and it makes the signal/noise ratio better, so you have less noise in the image and can stretch the signal you have even more. Then your blur of a landscape will be painted over in photoshop using a single exposure's foreground to make it look normal again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dan_bgblue
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 09, 2010 20:00 as a reply to  @ zeldaboy101's post |  #6

Regardless of the quality based solely on astrophotography, I really like the image. In fact I do believe you managed to capture a "fallen" star as well.:D


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gear list: S5IS, 40D, Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM, Canon 50mm f1.8 mk1, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM, 430EXII, Kenko 1.4x TC, tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VegasBoz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
373 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 09, 2010 22:58 as a reply to  @ zeldaboy101's post |  #7

I guess that's where I needed to do it different. I should have just taken timed exposures of just the stars....then taken one of the scene...then edited it to look like a landscape pic?

Hmmmm...

I have that program now. I guess I'll have to go back out and take a few frames and see what happens. Thanks again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VegasBoz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
373 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 09, 2010 23:00 |  #8

dan_bgblue wrote in post #10151000 (external link)
Regardless of the quality based solely on astrophotography, I really like the image. In fact I do believe you managed to capture a "fallen" star as well.:D

Haha... no, those were stragglers in the park that were driving inside. Needless to say I was frustrated when a few cars at different times kept getting in the picture.

Next time I'm going to go to a different location to minimize the potential for late departures out of there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpistone
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
May 09, 2010 23:37 |  #9

VegasBoz wrote in post #10151944 (external link)
Haha... no, those were stragglers in the park that were driving inside. Needless to say I was frustrated when a few cars at different times kept getting in the picture.

Next time I'm going to go to a different location to minimize the potential for late departures out of there.

That's another reason for stacking - if you're stacking lots of sky but just using one foreground you can pick a clean one :)
Show us your results!


-Matt
40D | 10-22mm | 17-85mm IS | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 f4 | 100mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,758 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Red Rock Canyon in Vegas - first try
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1089 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.