So I was bored tonight and figured I'd drive out to where I thought it would be dark and make an attempt at these kinds of photos. I learned some valuable lessons and hope to revisit taking these types of photos soon.
VegasBoz Senior Member 373 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 09, 2010 02:41 | #1 So I was bored tonight and figured I'd drive out to where I thought it would be dark and make an attempt at these kinds of photos. I learned some valuable lessons and hope to revisit taking these types of photos soon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zeldaboy101 Member 78 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | May 09, 2010 10:16 | #2 Very nice, the best time to do these shots is when the moon is behind you illuminating your landscape but not overly bright so you still get plenty of stars. If you do a lot of exposures to get more stars to show up, just use photoshop to only paint in 1 frame for the foreground so it doesn't show up as a big blur.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I started reading more last night but I'm not sure I understand the multiple exposures thing? If I'm taking multiple exposures won't the stars have moved and when I combine the exposures won't it appear as just a duplicated mass of the same stars, just in a different position? Don't answer that... I'm going to do more reading today with lots of notes and maybe go attempt the shot again.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpistone Senior Member 539 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Berkeley, CA More info | May 09, 2010 14:17 | #4 Good one! DeepSkyStacker -Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zeldaboy101 Member 78 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | May 09, 2010 17:08 | #5 You stack it based on the stars, that way they don't move, and it makes the signal/noise ratio better, so you have less noise in the image and can stretch the signal you have even more. Then your blur of a landscape will be painted over in photoshop using a single exposure's foreground to make it look normal again.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dan_bgblue Senior Member 632 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Regardless of the quality based solely on astrophotography, I really like the image. In fact I do believe you managed to capture a "fallen" star as well. Gear list: S5IS, 40D, Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM, Canon 50mm f1.8 mk1, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM, 430EXII, Kenko 1.4x TC, tripod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I guess that's where I needed to do it different. I should have just taken timed exposures of just the stars....then taken one of the scene...then edited it to look like a landscape pic?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 09, 2010 23:00 | #8 dan_bgblue wrote in post #10151000 Regardless of the quality based solely on astrophotography, I really like the image. In fact I do believe you managed to capture a "fallen" star as well. ![]() Haha... no, those were stragglers in the park that were driving inside. Needless to say I was frustrated when a few cars at different times kept getting in the picture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpistone Senior Member 539 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Berkeley, CA More info | May 09, 2010 23:37 | #9 VegasBoz wrote in post #10151944 Haha... no, those were stragglers in the park that were driving inside. Needless to say I was frustrated when a few cars at different times kept getting in the picture. Next time I'm going to go to a different location to minimize the potential for late departures out of there. That's another reason for stacking - if you're stacking lots of sky but just using one foreground you can pick a clean one -Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1089 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||