Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 12 May 2010 (Wednesday) 02:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Battery Grip Advantages & Disadvantages

 
xlovergirl
Member
Avatar
54 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Port Orchard, WA
     
May 12, 2010 02:50 |  #1

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a battery grip?


My NOT SO PRO Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
That_Fox
"In the Witless Protection Program"
Avatar
1,386 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Southern California
     
May 12, 2010 02:53 |  #2

Advantages:
•Allows use of two batteries
•Makes the camera larger and heavier
•Vertical shutter release

Disadvantages:
•Extra expense
•Makes the camera larger and heavier


Apparently I've been dubbed Foxy.
Alamy (external link), website (external link) and gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
May 12, 2010 03:10 |  #3

Here are a couple of many existing threads on the topic

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=821857
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=650904

and my thoughts...

I know I've posted this on here before but can't be bothered trying to find the link so I've just copied and pasted it from a word doc that I've created (the topic comes up so often) - it's easier and quicker to do this than trawl through threads to find what I'm looking for.

It's horses for courses but these are my thoughts...

I wouldn't shoot without a grip if I had the choice.
The extra controls are in exactly the same position as on the body and make the camera more usable when shooting vertically (portrait)
When I borrow my BIL's 400d that doesn't have one, it doesn't feel right and doesn't have as much usability as a body with a grip.
My old 10D and even older d30 both had grips as does my 40D.
The extra weight of a grip is so negligible, it's not worth talking about.
A 600ml bottle of water weighs more than a grip.
Most sports photographers might shoot as many as 4-5000 frames (sometimes more) in a day. I average around 2000 a day just at a club race meeting and as much battery life as possible is required. It's just one less thing to worry about when shooting.
Remember that it's not only firing the shutter that uses power, but also AF, the LCD screen and all the other electronic circuits in todays cameras.
However it is horses for courses and each to their own but I'm afraid I can't get my head around this "so much extra weight" thing that people always bring up with grips.
It borders on the ridiculous.

This is why...

A grip for a 40D weighs around 460g fully loaded with two batteries, at least that's what the kitchen scales I used told me - hahaha.
Thats 300 grams for the grip itself and and 160g for two batteries at 80g each.
If you are carrying two spare batteries anyway, then the grip adds only 300g extra.
Hardly back breaking.
And you've already got one battery in the camera anyway.
The average grip for other brands and aftermarket ones would be of similar weight, give or take a little either way.
A decent jumper/windcheater weighs around that, maybe more. A jacket even more than that again
If you're going out shooting and it might turn cold or wet, do you leave the jumper/windcheater/jac​ket home because they add too much extra weight? - err, probably not. You'd probably take all three AND the bottle of water.

Looking at the weight thing in another way - lets say you get rid of your 75-300 "kit" lens and upgrade to a better, heavier lens such as a 70-200/2.8L or 100-400L or Nikon/Sigma etc equivalent that weighs considerably more than the "kit" lens.
What do you do? Take the new heavier lens or leave it at home because it's too heavy and take the kit lens instead?
I know, you leave the new lens at home because it's too heavy.

Or this scenario - you finally upgrade the 20/30/40/5D etc (or Nikon equiv) and finally get the 1D MkIII or Mk IV you've been hanging out for that comes with its own built in grip and big battery and weighs considerably more than the old camera with no grip. Again, what do you do? Take the new camera or leave it home because its so much heavier than the old one?...

Tough call that one - Not!

What would I do? - Take BOTH bodies.
I'll bet there's people here who lug a tripod around on a shoot with them, in a lot of cases, unnecessarily, but won't have a grip because it "adds too much" weight.
I've never been able to work that one out.
As I said earlier, a 600ml bottle of water weighs more.
I guess those who suggest that a grip is too heavy would never consider carrying two or more bodies with lenses to go with them let alone owning a 300, 400 or even a 500 prime - 'cause they weigh a TON.


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
klr.b
Goldmember
2,509 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
     
May 12, 2010 03:22 |  #4

another advantage is you can quickly change batteries if the camera is on a tripod. the battery tray just slides out the side.


gordon
Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ALaS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,205 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2007
     
May 12, 2010 03:30 |  #5

Lenses feel a lot more balanced and the battery life is superb! Unless you really don't like the extra weight/size, don't do it. Otherwise, go go go!


Best Regards,
-Ericson.
flick (external link)r (external link) | Gear -Canon 1Ds Mark II, 50L & 28mm f/1.8 for SALE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lacks_focus
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Coventry, CT
     
May 12, 2010 07:50 |  #6

philwillmedia wrote in post #10165876 (external link)
Or this scenario - you finally upgrade the 20/30/40/5D etc (or Nikon equiv) and finally get the 1D MkIII or Mk IV you've been hanging out for that comes with its own built in grip and big battery and weighs considerably more than the old camera with no grip. Again, what do you do? Take the new camera or leave it home because its so much heavier than the old one?...

Why does it have to be about weight? Sometimes I just want a smaller camera to take with me. The 1DMK3 isn't all that heavy, especially compared to the MK2 I used to have, but it is BIG and I find that I don't take it with me very much unless I am actually going out to shoot something. An un-gripped XXD will fit in smaller bags, like the tank bag on my motorcycle, and it will come with me more often than the MK3 does. In my case, it has nothing to do with weight. It comes down to portability. Grips are a good thing, as you can put them on or take them off as you like. I don't think there are any negatives to having a grip for your camera. Although, I do miss that fact that a grip in the film days added more FPS as it was an actual motor drive too. Now it's just the extra battery and controls.


1D MKIII | FujiFilm X10 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 | 135 f/2 | 85 f/1.8 | 580EX |
lacks-focus.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
May 12, 2010 10:31 |  #7

Vertical shooting is the benefit but that would be it for me.

Swapping bp-511's in a non grip takes about 5 seconds.

Personal preference determines grip or no grip.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lundgrenj
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
May 12, 2010 10:37 |  #8

The biggest for me, is when you have a heavy lens, or a flash on the shoe, the camera is MUCH more solid in your hand. Grip is BEST word here.

I take off the grip, when I don't want the weight (say on vacation) with a smaller lens on the camera.


Canon 7D, 6D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 12, 2010 12:05 |  #9

Big disadvantage of a grip is that people try to use it to support the camera with. This leads to strain, and makes for more camera shake. You should support your camera/lens combo from beneath with your left hand at the balance point. Yes, you can still zoom, and focus, as needed that way.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,585 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Battery Grip Advantages & Disadvantages
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2692 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.