Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 12 May 2010 (Wednesday) 16:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

family portrait

 
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 12, 2010 16:00 |  #1

first studio family portrait.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/4597656635_ffdfd9594f.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126/4598272350_982a7792c0.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/4598272924_710b646387.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1223/4597657657_24f46a0ba2.jpg

http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rootus
Member
36 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 12, 2010 20:37 |  #2

Nice shots. I like 1 & 3 the best. On #2 I think it would be better sans thumb. I like the idea of #4, but IMO it needs more light so the right eye on dad isn't in shadow


7D, 28-135, Σ 30mm f/1.4, 430EXII, 5MDH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 13, 2010 09:49 |  #3

thanks. really appreciate it.


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
May 13, 2010 10:26 |  #4

A hair light to separate them from the background might have been a good idea, or if you don't have one, a different colored background perhaps? Also, a reflector would have kicked up some extra side light to lessen the harshness of those sideshadows. Darker skin absorbs a lot more light than lighter skin, and that has to be taken into account as well. Those technical issues aside, and THEY might not even see those, your poses are appropriate for a young family. I can see the family pic, number 1, framed on the desk areadly! I love that last one especially. very cute!


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FELINEDEBOURGES
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
     
May 13, 2010 12:10 |  #5

To me it seems the light is much too hard. I don't think most people like to see hard edged shadows on their faces.


sarahashleyphotography​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ariananeal
Member
36 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sacramento
     
May 13, 2010 12:42 |  #6

Did they want to have sunglasses on their head?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 13, 2010 17:18 |  #7

ariananeal wrote in post #10174497 (external link)
Did they want to have sunglasses on their head?

the mom wants the sunglasses on her head...told her to take it off..and she doesn't want to... eh...what can you do?


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 13, 2010 17:23 |  #8

suecassidy wrote in post #10173704 (external link)
A hair light to separate them from the background might have been a good idea, or if you don't have one, a different colored background perhaps? Also, a reflector would have kicked up some extra side light to lessen the harshness of those sideshadows. Darker skin absorbs a lot more light than lighter skin, and that has to be taken into account as well. Those technical issues aside, and THEY might not even see those, your poses are appropriate for a young family. I can see the family pic, number 1, framed on the desk areadly! I love that last one especially. very cute!

I had a speedlight over there heads... you can see it bouncing on the little boy's hair.. I guess I should have maximized the power .. I think it was just at 1/8.

I was using a white translucent umbrella camera left AB800 and a beauty dish AB1600 on the right. anda 430EX II speedlight on a boom over there heads.

maybe next time I should light up the background too , no?


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
May 13, 2010 17:54 |  #9

That's a boy? oh. in any event, you aren't using your hair correctly if that is how it turned out. You might want to find a dark haired subject you could use as a model to nail that issue down before you do another sitting with dark haired clients. You can play with the hair light or lighting the background, until you get the separation that you like. What you see with your eyes is completely different than what you will actually capture, so kept that in mind when experimenting.

So you had lights on the left, lights on the right, a light overhead -- looks like you just need to adjust the lights differently to get the desired results, as these shadows are producing what looks like a 4-1 lighting ratio, while you probably wanted a 2-1, or 3-1 at best.

It brings up an interesting subject when you say you tried to get Mom to remove her sunglasses and she wouldn't. I've used to have that kind of attitude when I first starting shooting portraits years ago, except it was with huge watches or oversized bracelets at that time. Once in a while, someone with a Rolex would insist on hiking the suit jacket up a notch and WANT it to be shown. Rather than argue, I would shoot it and let the unspoken "I told you so" hang in the air when it gleamed distractedly in the finished product. Once I turned 40 years old, I wouldn't argue, but I developed my people skills to the point that nobody ever said no. When I turned 50, I was polite but firm, and became very authorative and matter of fact and got very good at directing sittings and that continued to work for me. Perhaps you can be more authoritative and explain to her that it will cause all kinds of technical reflection issues (which it did), won't look like she "envisions" it would (which it didn't) and that after you get the shot "in the can", you'll do a few with the glasses on her head, if she reminds you. Chances are she won't.
in any event, they are a cute family!


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tim ­ Park
Goldmember
1,416 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southern California
     
May 13, 2010 18:00 |  #10

Overall, I think you did a nice job, especially for your first studio portrait. I do think the light is too harsh. It makes their faces too shiny, like they're perspiring. You can tone that down a bit in pp. Are these the original crops? If so, they feel a bit too cramped. I hope this helps.

Tim


www.timparkphoto.com (external link)
5DmkII, 5D
24LII, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 24-70L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
580EXII, 580EX (2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 13, 2010 19:07 |  #11

suecassidy wrote in post #10176143 (external link)
That's a boy? oh. in any event, you aren't using your hair correctly if that is how it turned out. You might want to find a dark haired subject you could use as a model to nail that issue down before you do another sitting with dark haired clients. You can play with the hair light or lighting the background, until you get the separation that you like. What you see with your eyes is completely different than what you will actually capture, so kept that in mind when experimenting.

So you had lights on the left, lights on the right, a light overhead -- looks like you just need to adjust the lights differently to get the desired results, as these shadows are producing what looks like a 4-1 lighting ratio, while you probably wanted a 2-1, or 3-1 at best.

It brings up an interesting subject when you say you tried to get Mom to remove her sunglasses and she wouldn't. I've used to have that kind of attitude when I first starting shooting portraits years ago, except it was with huge watches or oversized bracelets at that time. Once in a while, someone with a Rolex would insist on hiking the suit jacket up a notch and WANT it to be shown. Rather than argue, I would shoot it and let the unspoken "I told you so" hang in the air when it gleamed distractedly in the finished product. Once I turned 40 years old, I wouldn't argue, but I developed my people skills to the point that nobody ever said no. When I turned 50, I was polite but firm, and became very authorative and matter of fact and got very good at directing sittings and that continued to work for me. Perhaps you can be more authoritative and explain to her that it will cause all kinds of technical reflection issues (which it did), won't look like she "envisions" it would (which it didn't) and that after you get the shot "in the can", you'll do a few with the glasses on her head, if she reminds you. Chances are she won't.
in any event, they are a cute family!

thank you so much...really appreciate it. what do you mean when you say 4 to 1 then 2 to 1?


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
May 13, 2010 19:08 |  #12

Tim Park wrote in post #10176168 (external link)
Overall, I think you did a nice job, especially for your first studio portrait. I do think the light is too harsh. It makes their faces too shiny, like they're perspiring. You can tone that down a bit in pp. Are these the original crops? If so, they feel a bit too cramped. I hope this helps.

Tim

thank you... yes it's my first studio portrait. These are originals.


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,914 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
family portrait
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2034 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.