Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 13 May 2010 (Thursday) 15:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Light meter - Incident light metering

 
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
May 13, 2010 15:26 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I have the sekonic L-308s, and have been told that incident light metering is the most accurate metering, since the camera's metering (reflective) isn't that accurate in mid-tone

Is incident metering mean that the light meter is pointing towards the light source with the lumisphere not in the way of the light meter's sensor?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
May 13, 2010 15:32 |  #2

For incident light readings you want the sphere over the sensor and yes, you point at the light source. From the subject location, if possible.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
May 13, 2010 15:41 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

number six wrote in post #10175456 (external link)
For incident light readings you want the sphere over the sensor and yes, you point at the light source. From the subject location, if possible.

-js

Orite, I see, thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
May 13, 2010 16:00 |  #4

number six wrote in post #10175456 (external link)
For incident light readings you want the sphere over the sensor and yes, you point at the light source. From the subject location, if possible.

-js

Point it at the camera.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
May 13, 2010 16:56 |  #5

windpig wrote in post #10175596 (external link)
Point it at the camera.

Y'know, I always point at the light source, but you're right. If the source is significantly off line with the camera that would give a bad reading.

So point it at the camera!

:oops:


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 13, 2010 22:50 |  #6

number six wrote in post #10175456 (external link)
For incident light readings you want the sphere over the sensor and yes, you point at the light source. From the subject location, if possible.

-js

Point the incident hemisphere to the camera lens, not to the source of the light, for measuring the exposure to be used.

You point the incident meter at the light source only for measuring light ratios (Main:Fill)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
May 13, 2010 23:10 |  #7

Wilt wrote in post #10177628 (external link)
Point the incident hemisphere to the camera lens, not to the source of the light, for measuring the exposure to be used.

You point the incident meter at the light source only for measuring light ratios (Main:Fill)

Yep.  :o


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 13, 2010 23:14 |  #8

number six wrote in post #10177707 (external link)
Yep. :o

Yeah, intestinal air bubbles from the brain happen to us all! ;)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HYBEagle
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
May 14, 2010 15:24 |  #9

the ball of the light meter is also 18% grey, is this correct ?


20D | 17-40 f/4 | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 IS | 200 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 14, 2010 15:29 |  #10

HYBEagle wrote in post #10181768 (external link)
the ball of the light meter is also 18% grey, is this correct ?

The hemisphere is calibrated to a particular light level which is equivalent to using a reflected with meter pointed to 12-18% gray, depending upon what calibration constant was chosen by the light meter manufacturer. The italicized text is the reason that one brand of light meter does not match a different brand of light meter, when both are pointed at the identical uniform tone! And it is known that Canon itself has changed meter calibration in later dSLRs (for 'true ISO 100') compared to its earlier dSLRs (which tended to give a reading for ISO 125 when its meter was set to ISO 100!)

My Minolta Autometer V happens to match the reading with 18% gray card with both my Minolta Spotmeter F and my Canon 40D light meters, but my 5D meter is 1/3EV different.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,403 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Light meter - Incident light metering
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2799 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.