So what did everyone think? I think were gonna be seeing alot more of this type of filming in the future.
I liked it!
scpictaker Goldmember ![]() 1,385 posts Likes: 9 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Edgerton Wis More info | May 17, 2010 20:03 | #1 So what did everyone think? I think were gonna be seeing alot more of this type of filming in the future. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 17, 2010 20:29 | #2 I really like the depth of field these cameras/lenses give. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Angdvl089 Senior Member ![]() 835 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Mass More info | May 17, 2010 20:30 | #3 The DOF seemed too shallow at first but I just wasn't used to seeing it like that on TV. All in all I thought it was pretty cool. I wonder how much light there was under all that "rubble". flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 17, 2010 20:48 | #4 I expected to see more 1st person camera angles, but in all, I was impressed. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 18, 2010 00:03 | #5 It was pretty awesome. The price/performance ratio of this equipment is unbeatable. I'm very excited to see where this goes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corduroy Member 143 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jul 2007 Location: San Diego, CA More info | May 18, 2010 09:51 | #6 I noticed the depth of field difference in the opening shots but then later in the episode it looked more like regular tv. Not sure if I got used to it or what. Canon T2i & 30D - 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM - 50mm f/1.8 II - Speedlite 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FSUnoles Senior Member ![]() 739 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | May 18, 2010 10:32 | #7 |
Terjay Senior Member 448 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Ylöjärvi, Finland More info | May 18, 2010 12:17 | #9 It really didn't look insanely different than before, but it was a pretty good episode after a bunch of bad episodes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Technophile Senior Member ![]() 298 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Gilroy / Santa Cruz, CA More info | May 18, 2010 12:48 | #10 I thought it was pretty neat to see the shallow dof, especially in those scenes posted above. a lot of the show looked just normal for the standard shots. i was only able to watch the show in standard def though 5D Mark II | Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L |Canon 24-70 f2.8 L | Canon 35 f1.4 L | Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS | Canon 135 f2.0 L | Canon 400 f5.6 L | Speedlite 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
benesotor Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 15 Joined Mar 2009 More info | May 18, 2010 16:18 | #11 The filming they did just makes me realise there's a lot more to making an awesome looking piece of film than a DSLR and a fast lens... so much goes into lighting and good framing and movement and great colour grading... I've got a lot to learn!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
naqs Goldmember ![]() 1,814 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | May 23, 2010 03:27 | #12 What Benesotor said. There is more to that episode than just the camera. They could have achieved similar results with the Sony F35 or the Red. A lot of it was in the lighting. Nathan[I][SIZE=1] [CENTER]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is rush1981 629 guests, 350 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |