Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 19 May 2010 (Wednesday) 20:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Simple Legal / Ethics Question - heh, heh

 
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
May 19, 2010 20:20 |  #1

The local HS soccer team hired me to shoot the entire team in action for a slideshow at their banquet plus make posters of the senior athletes. I use a PS template I made to make pretty nice sports posters and I do this kind of work regularly.

The senior team captain tore her ACL in the 3rd game (before they hired me) so I have no opportunity to shoot her. The athlete has high resolution digital images from a different photographer that she purchased. My clients want me to use the image file that they have bought to put into my template so that they have a poster to match the other seniors.

So....This is raising some concenrs in my head around two main areas. The use of the purchased high resolution file commercially (even if I do this one poster gratis to complete the job I suspect an issue) and the modification of the photo. My simple question:
1. Is there any reason to think that the parents can modify the image file they bought as well as reproduce it?
2. There is no clear statement from the photographer's commercial website. I went to his site and picked a photo at random which I could purchase the high resolution file. The high res file purchase suggested that it allows unlimited reproduction. Is it assumed this limits commercial use? Is what they are asking me to do commercial use?

Fill me in.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matthew ­ Hicks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
2,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
     
May 19, 2010 20:27 |  #2

Personally, I'd email the original photographer, explain the situation, and ask for permission.


Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
Avatar
4,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2008
     
May 19, 2010 20:34 |  #3

Trainboy wrote in post #10212756 (external link)
Personally, I'd email the original photographer, explain the situation, and ask for permission.

I second this. It's not difficult to ask.

"It's easier to beg forgiveness than to ask permission" fails when the law gets involved.


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
May 19, 2010 21:13 |  #4

I would ask as well. Explain well the situation so they understand that it the team that is suggesting you ask. Not just some GWC asking for a image for free. If I was the other photographer, I would have no problem with the situation.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mhappy
Senior Member
356 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 19, 2010 21:45 |  #5

Trainboy wrote in post #10212756 (external link)
Personally, I'd email the original photographer, explain the situation, and ask for permission.

+1.


50D / XT (backup) / 17-85mm / 24-70mm f/2.8 L / 50mm f/1.8 / 2- 430 EX Speedlite and a Fonger (I know most photogs hate it, but I like it!) / Everything else I use... I rent! ;-)a

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mchong75
Goldmember
2,927 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Frisco, TX
     
May 19, 2010 21:50 |  #6

Well, did the team purchase the soft copy of her photo?

Than, isn't it legally the school's property?


(Michael) Gears:
5D MK III / Grip (2) | Canon 24-70L II | Canon 17-40L | Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mark II | 600EX-RT (2) | ST-E3-RT | PCB Einstein (2) | Pocket Wizard Plus III (4) | PCB 47" Octobox | Vagabond Mini | Kacey Beauty dish | Lee ND, GND & Big Stopper | Lastolite 24" x 24" | Gitzo 3541LS tripod | Markins Q20 w/ RRS B2 LR II | Sigma 35 Art | 85L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
May 19, 2010 21:56 |  #7

Regardless of what you ultimately end up doing, the professional thing to do would be to email the photographer and explain the situation and ask for permission. It's only for the slideshow, right? You wouldn't be selling the posters also? Anyway, in my opinion, Not only is it the professional thing to do, It's just good karma.


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,719 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: newcastle.nsw.au
     
May 19, 2010 22:02 |  #8

mchong75 wrote in post #10213174 (external link)
Well, did the team purchase the soft copy of her photo?

Than, isn't it legally the school's property?

No. The copyright of that photo still resides with the photographer. Effectively by selling a high res digital image, the photographer has granted a license to use and reproduce the image. The question is whether that (implied?) license also allows the purchaser to modify the image or provide it to a third party to use and possibly earn money from.


[gallery (external link)|gear|flickr (external link)|blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubi ­ Jane
Goldmember
Avatar
1,827 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Waterdown, ON
     
May 20, 2010 00:51 |  #9

I'd ask the other photographer but I'd suggest a phone call over email. We're so quick to fire off an email and it's so easy for the recipient to misunderstand our intentions. Touching base personally on a phone call will allow you to explain the situation better, and it's harder to say 'no' to someone in person or on the phone than in an email ;-)a


Lindsey
Gear - Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tfd888
Goldmember
Avatar
1,816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2009
Location: CA, USA
     
May 20, 2010 02:39 |  #10

Trainboy wrote in post #10212756 (external link)
Personally, I'd email the original photographer, explain the situation, and ask for permission.

I'll chime in with the rest saying the same thing. Unless they purchased the photos with a license for commercial use, contact the photographer and explain the situation.


Alexander R.O.
1D-Mark III ~1D-Mark II ~ 60D ~ 20D (Gripped)
(70-200mm L 2.8 IS) ~ (17-40mm L 4.0) (Sigma 24-70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro RIP) ~ (50mm 1.8 MKII) ~ (Alpex 35mm f/2.8 M42 mount) ~ (430EX II) ~ (Yongnuo YN-560 III)
My Website (external link) - My Blog (external link)
- My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,719 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: newcastle.nsw.au
     
May 20, 2010 02:47 |  #11

Rubi Jane wrote in post #10213997 (external link)
I'd ask the other photographer but I'd suggest a phone call over email. We're so quick to fire off an email and it's so easy for the recipient to misunderstand our intentions. Touching base personally on a phone call will allow you to explain the situation better, and it's harder to say 'no' to someone in person or on the phone than in an email ;-)a

A very good point, although you might want to request a response via email so you have a record of permission being given.


[gallery (external link)|gear|flickr (external link)|blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
May 20, 2010 07:31 |  #12

mchong75 wrote in post #10213174 (external link)
Well, did the team purchase the soft copy of her photo?

Than, isn't it legally the school's property?

In the US, the original photographer owns the copyright unless the photographer is an actual employee of the school system and photography is part of his job or there is a contract specifically stating that the job is "for hire" and the copyright is being transferred to the school.

The owner of the copyright has the only legal right to determine when, how, and by whom other copies can be made, including derivative works such as this poster.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
May 20, 2010 07:32 |  #13

AdamC wrote in post #10214296 (external link)
A very good point, although you might want to request a response via email so you have a record of permission being given.

After the phone call, send an email restating the understood agreement and requesting a response.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
May 20, 2010 07:39 |  #14

mchong75 wrote in post #10213174 (external link)
Well, did the team purchase the soft copy of her photo?

Than, isn't it legally the school's property?

I doubt the team "purchased" the photo. They most likely "licensed" the photo for specific usage, which may or may not allow another photographer to include it in a collage of other photographs.

I "buy" all my music "soft copy" from Amazon's MP3 store. That doesn't mean I can start selling my mp3s to folks since I "own it" :lol:

http://www.google.com …8&startIndex=&s​tartPage=1 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tarzanman
Senior Member
548 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
May 20, 2010 07:43 |  #15

I would notify the other photographer and, if I were feeling generous, offer a fair (cut-rate) compensation for use of the image. The other tog has already made their money from sale of the image.

If he/she thinks that it is in his/her interest to pursue legal action over putting a single photo in a template for a customer who has already paid them.... well... then they must already have a lawyer on retainer.

I know many of you will cry foul, but I am being practical. The team/player has already paid both photographers and this is a single image with almost no resale value that is being used.

I say, take the image and apply the template. Make your customer happy and don't worry about another tog being butt-hurt about an image they already have money for (and won't ever sell again).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,207 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Simple Legal / Ethics Question - heh, heh
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1637 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.