![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
JoePhotoOnline Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Central Valley, California More info | May 23, 2010 20:47 | #1 |
JoePhotoOnline THREAD STARTER Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Central Valley, California More info | May 23, 2010 20:48 | #2 |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | May 23, 2010 20:55 | #3 Gas discharge lighting changes intensity and color at twice the rate of the power line frequency. This is because the voltage is cycling from 0 volts to maximum 120 times per second in the US and at 100 times per second in places using 50Hz power. This is an often-seen thing with fluorescent lighting. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoePhotoOnline THREAD STARTER Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Central Valley, California More info | May 23, 2010 20:59 | #4 SkipD wrote in post #10233593 Gas discharge lighting changes intensity and color at twice the rate of the power line frequency. This is because the voltage is cycling from 0 volts to maximum 120 times per second in the US and at 100 times per second in places using 50Hz power. This is an often-seen thing with fluorescent lighting. When using gas discharge lighting and a shutter speed faster than 1/120 second (or 1/100 second where the power line frequency is 100Hz), the images can easily look different from one to the next, both in intensity and color. Thanks SkipD. I knew that, but I was just sharing this graphic I made so that others could be aware about it. Thank you for the description.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | May 23, 2010 21:15 | #5 JoePhotoOnline wrote in post #10233617 Thanks SkipD. I knew that, but I was just sharing this graphic I made so that others could be aware about it. Thank you for the description. Can you slow down the cycling of the images so folks can see the differences better? Five to ten times the delay would be good in my opinion. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoePhotoOnline THREAD STARTER Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Central Valley, California More info | May 23, 2010 21:25 | #6 |
neilwood32 Cream of the Crop 6,231 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland More info | May 24, 2010 07:33 | #7 A very good example of how the cycling of lighting can affect the images. Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | May 24, 2010 08:53 | #8 neilwood32 wrote in post #10235548 And also a good example of where RAW comes to the rescue - all the shots can be recovered to the "correct" WB with a few simple clicks with no IQ loss at all. This is not quite true, at least with the photos presented in the demo. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neilwood32 Cream of the Crop 6,231 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland More info | May 24, 2010 11:48 | #9 I see what you mean - the deep background outside the fence is "lit" by ambient light or the lack of it. However within the fence, it appears to be lit evenly (hard to tell at the rate of the frames). Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2529 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||