Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 25 Jul 2005 (Monday) 01:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Q&A Session with Martin: B&W Photography

 
RAitch
Goldmember
Avatar
2,917 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sarnia Ontario, Canada
     
Aug 27, 2005 06:06 as a reply to  @ post 740569 |  #361

Mannytkd wrote:
To RAitch, i've tried your way and it turned as bad, i've recently had a lesson fron Martin with a different approach and it turned out fantastic. I think that to fair it's getting confusing for people getting different techniches when it should be the person who put up this Q&A section on B&W and thats Martin, he' been involved in B&W for over 30 years and its as if people are trying to take over. I never knoew about B&W until Martin taught me, i've tried other peoples ways and will always listen to Martin form now on.......!?

Thanks.

Sorry, I'll stop giving advise 'against' Martin then.
Perhaps you would get similar results if you had a lesson showing you these different techniques as well. Perhaps I assumed you knew as much as you were saying...

I know how to do all that...

... and instead should have assumed you needed a full demo.

BTW, I'm not trying to "take over" anything... just help out as you asked.

I hope he also showed you the localized contrast technique... that pic really will benefit from it.


See Through The Lens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Aug 27, 2005 07:03 as a reply to  @ RAitch's post |  #362

RAitch wrote:
Sorry, I'll stop giving advise 'against' Martin then.
Perhaps you would get similar results if you had a lesson showing you these different techniques as well. Perhaps I assumed you knew as much as you were saying...

... and instead should have assumed you needed a full demo.

BTW, I'm not trying to "take over" anything... just help out as you asked.

I hope he also showed you the localized contrast technique... that pic really will benefit from it.

Vot ist der 'localised contrast technique' please?


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAitch
Goldmember
Avatar
2,917 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sarnia Ontario, Canada
     
Aug 27, 2005 08:38 as a reply to  @ I Simonius's post |  #363

Simon king wrote:
Vot ist der 'localised contrast technique' please?

It's the method of using the unsharp mask option with a radius higher than the amount to increase contrast.

It's pretty much the key thing Martin is trying to push here... and has a great affect on B&W images.

See the link I posted earlier for a nice description.
http://www.cambridgein​colour.com …-contrast-enhancement.htm (external link)


See Through The Lens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martin-images
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Leeds West Yorkshire UK
     
Aug 27, 2005 11:13 as a reply to  @ I Simonius's post |  #364

Simon , local contrast not only increases the overall contrast between tones it also benafits in making the blacks deeper and the whites whiter, it has to be used withcare as it can cause halos between say sky and horizan, for small areas the laso toool with a feather of approx 10~15 is ok but for larger areas its best to copy the layer ~apply usm AMMOUNT at anything between 13 and 60 RADIOUS at 55 and THRESHOLD at 0 depending how much you want, then presing Alt and the add layer mask icon in the layers pallete at the same time, when you do this the photo will go back to the background layer look with no usm, all you do then is paint in where you want the contrast to be with a soft brush makeing sure your forground colour is set to white in the tools pallete, it all sounds complicated but its simple once you done it, below is an example the first is without usm the second with it applied, the effect can be seen best in the water in the first its dead looking in the second its come to life and the blacks are much deeper, and this pic isnt finished yet :-)
ps
please excuse the look of these as i am still working on the second, its for an example only how USM can lift the contrast in a photo like no other procces in PS
i will post the fin version later

Martin

Simon king wrote:
Vot ist der 'localised contrast technique' please?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


One on One workshop, details http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/page3018.htm​l (external link)

Contrast Grading & PWF workflow tutorials, do it the pro way
http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/otheritems.h​tml (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAitch
Goldmember
Avatar
2,917 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sarnia Ontario, Canada
     
Aug 27, 2005 11:31 |  #365

It seems to enhance the flaws of the image too.. check out those lens flairs in the trees. That why it's a good idea to selectively increase the contrast as needed or to mask certain areas out (initially).

You'd probably want to do any healing and cloning before you do this step. As Martin said, this image is just a demo. I'm sure he'll drop your jaw when he posts a final image.


See Through The Lens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martin-images
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Leeds West Yorkshire UK
     
Aug 27, 2005 11:34 as a reply to  @ RAitch's post |  #366

Hi RAitch
I think the reason why this has been mentioned is that i do give online tuition for BW conversion, and to advanced editing tech sometimes can be confusing for those just starting out in this, your knowledge in CS seems to be considerable as regards layer masking, converting using hue and sat etc etc, but the idea here is to slowly build a knowledge of editing the idea behind it and a basic conversion tecq, all the other will follow naturally as we proceed and go further into the subject, please keep your interst here going but i think it appropiate that one answers the questions as quite a few are people here have or in the process of taking online lessons in this and it does confuse them with two differing approaches to BW, by all means put your imput in and show your different approach in pictures etc, hope that the remarks have not put you off in the future to keep this thread going

Martin

RAitch wrote:
Sorry, I'll stop giving advise 'against' Martin then.
Perhaps you would get similar results if you had a lesson showing you these different techniques as well. Perhaps I assumed you knew as much as you were saying...


... and instead should have assumed you needed a full demo.

BTW, I'm not trying to "take over" anything... just help out as you asked.

I hope he also showed you the localized contrast technique... that pic really will benefit from it.


One on One workshop, details http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/page3018.htm​l (external link)

Contrast Grading & PWF workflow tutorials, do it the pro way
http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/otheritems.h​tml (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martin-images
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Leeds West Yorkshire UK
     
Aug 27, 2005 11:55 as a reply to  @ RAitch's post |  #367

Yes it does accentuate flaws because of the increase in edge sharpening of the pixels and as said previously needs using with a certain amount of care, but all this can be made good with further editing, i will post the fin version when its done, the image below HAS had selective contrast applied to it and i find it better to spot heal AFTER the process as if more contrast control is required the image will require a second go with the spot healing tool.

Martin

RAitch wrote:
It seems to enhance the flaws of the image too.. check out those lens flairs in the trees. That why it's a good idea to selectively increase the contrast as needed or to mask certain areas out (initially).

You'd probably want to do any healing and cloning before you do this step. As Martin said, this image is just a demo. I'm sure he'll drop your jaw when he posts a final image.


One on One workshop, details http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/page3018.htm​l (external link)

Contrast Grading & PWF workflow tutorials, do it the pro way
http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/otheritems.h​tml (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mannytkd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bradford West Yorkshire
     
Aug 27, 2005 15:59 as a reply to  @ martin-images's post |  #368

This is the second pic of Barden Tower, the first had terrible halo's around the edges, but with perseverance and some suport from Martin i now have success....??


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
www.karls-photography.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eenorton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Aug 27, 2005 18:33 |  #369

Karl, that definitely took care of that halo problem! What did you differently? Did you create a mask and then "white brush" out the area you wanted to use the USM on? Not sure I asked that very clearly.... I had never used masks before, but I'm certainly learning the benefit of it and get more and more comfortable with each try. I get *easily* confused with layers and find myself trying to do something on a layer and nothing happens.... so I'll flatten the image and move on. I know I lose my opportunity to go back and adjust previous work, but.... I'm learning. :)
Beth


Beth

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Aug 27, 2005 19:06 |  #370

Hi Beth.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eenorton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Aug 27, 2005 19:06 |  #371

Hi!


Beth

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martin-images
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Leeds West Yorkshire UK
     
Aug 28, 2005 03:21 |  #372

Heres the finished version of Swinsty Reservoir in Yorkshire,. i have used extensive usm contrast control on this pic to give reasonable blacks and whites, using the masking method as previously talked about, plus selective colour again using layer masks, by using the masks its better especialy on high contrast photos as there is far less chance of getting halos on the sky lines, after that fine tuneing the picture with Dand B and levels

Higher quaity version @ http://www.digital-monochrome.com/jpg108.​htm (external link)

Martin
the colour version is for you to have a go its straigt from the raw converter no manipulation, apart from ive removed the dirt marks my censer gives for you :(


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


One on One workshop, details http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/page3018.htm​l (external link)

Contrast Grading & PWF workflow tutorials, do it the pro way
http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/otheritems.h​tml (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mannytkd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bradford West Yorkshire
     
Aug 28, 2005 03:36 as a reply to  @ eenorton's post |  #373

......yes i did use the mask option afteMartin showed me, but i chose to set the brush to 100% hardness and zommed in to 100% to edit and get as close as i could to the edge therefore i got no overburn what-so-ever.....??

eenorton wrote:
Karl, that definitely took care of that halo problem! What did you differently? Did you create a mask and then "white brush" out the area you wanted to use the USM on? Not sure I asked that very clearly.... I had never used masks before, but I'm certainly learning the benefit of it and get more and more comfortable with each try. I get *easily* confused with layers and find myself trying to do something on a layer and nothing happens.... so I'll flatten the image and move on. I know I lose my opportunity to go back and adjust previous work, but.... I'm learning. :)
Beth


Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
www.karls-photography.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martin-images
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Leeds West Yorkshire UK
     
Aug 28, 2005 04:29 as a reply to  @ aam1234's post |  #374

Have you any more imput for the the thread aam, you no BW :-), maybe its turing into a chat room lol, those last two posts of yours , realy helpful and interesting:D :D :D :D :lol: :lol:

Martin

aam1234 wrote:
Hi Beth.


One on One workshop, details http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/page3018.htm​l (external link)

Contrast Grading & PWF workflow tutorials, do it the pro way
http://martinimages.ph​otium.com/otheritems.h​tml (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mannytkd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bradford West Yorkshire
     
Aug 28, 2005 05:05 as a reply to  @ martin-images's post |  #375

Another pic of Bursal, but this time a view form a small hill looking onto it. As you can see it's a very small village....


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
www.karls-photography.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

136,698 views & 1 like for this thread, 56 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Q&A Session with Martin: B&W Photography
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1765 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.