Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 29 May 2010 (Saturday) 05:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Curcular Polarizing filter

 
Mike410
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: London, England
     
May 29, 2010 05:53 |  #1

Hello,

Was thinking of getting a Circular Polarizing filter. I don't own any filters and was wondering if this would be a good one to get. It would be good to be able to darken skies so they are not over exposed.

I was thinking of this Hama one as it is quite a good price:

http://www.amazon.co.u​k …=467198433&pf_r​d_i=468294 (external link)

Does anyone have any recommendations or advice on this Hama filter or others?

Thanks,

Mike


Canon EOS 500D | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 non-VC | EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS |Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
May 29, 2010 06:26 |  #2

TBH, a polarizer is not the best filter to use if you're trying to avoid having blown-out skies...that's where a graduated neutral density (GND) filter comes into play. Remember that a polarizer is consistent across its surface...it will have the same effect on the entire frame by decreasing the exposure equally across the frame. Your camera's meter will account for the filter and adjust the exposure values accordingly, but you'll still have a sky that's much brighter than the foreground.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
May 29, 2010 06:51 |  #3

The forum needs to do a sticky for filters in the future, but the opinions are so varied, it's hard to explain to newbies.

There is a reason why some filters are cheap and others are expensive. I had several inexpensive Canon filters when I started years ago. They didn't do much for the images. I came onto the forum and realized that Ritz Camera wasn't the end all. My brother, who is a pro, never told me about B&H and all the other great on-line camera shops, including Amazon. I found out there were thousands of choices out there for everything and I read all the threads about filters before getting the UV and CP filters. I buy mainly Hoya and B+W, as they are in the mid-range, and have good reviews. Hoya filters are good, but they are more difficult to clean. B+W are more expensive, but easy to clean. If you need a filter, don't think about getting the cheapest one out there. If you are going to put something in front of your lens, make it something worth the money and can actually improve your shot.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 29, 2010 10:51 |  #4

Hama CPL was not included in the CPL tests done by Lenstip.com, so I would avoid it as a cheapo inferior filter unless proven otherwise. Even names like Tiffen and Canon are inferior filters!

And while there is speculation that the Hama filters are rebranded Hoya filters, there is a line of cheapo single coated Hoya filters that I would never own! It is not uncommon for major manufacturers to make private label products under contract, to custom (specified by client) specifications which are typically inferior to the manufacturer's main line (why undermine their own line?!)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DANATTHEROCK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 29, 2010 19:17 |  #5

Look at the Hoya Pro 1D and Hoya HD circular polarizers. I have both and they work great. Also note, most cheap filters don't have front threads which means you can't keep a lens cap on your lens when using them. The multicoating is most important. Look at higher end offerings from B&W, Hoya, and Heliopan if you want a good CPL. However, I agree with the previous comment. Sounds like you need a graduated ND filter. I have the Singh Ray Galen Rowell 3 stop soft and it is fantastic. This is something you need to research heavily before spending your hard earned money. Many choices and frankly, there is a lot of junk on the market. I suggest buying quality the first time. If not, you will likely put a filter on that substantially drops the IQ of your images.


Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike410
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: London, England
     
Jun 03, 2010 18:21 as a reply to  @ DANATTHEROCK's post |  #6

Thanks for the replies!


Canon EOS 500D | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 non-VC | EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS |Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
georgebowman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,510 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: Verona, WI
     
Jun 04, 2010 04:11 |  #7

Great discussion. I am in the process of buying a circular polorizer and a graduated ND filter as well. I have Hoya Pro1 UVs on my lenses and they work great. Unfortunately, I tried a less expensive filter first and it degraded my images big-time. The Hoya Pro1 doesn't. I am shooting a 17-55 f2.8 Canon EF-s (77 mm filter size). What would you recommend for a graduated ND? Would you go for the the Cokin P holder and Singh-ray? I've heard the could be some image clipping on some of the ND holders. Any advice?


My Gear: 7d, XTi, 17-55f2.8 EF-S, 70-200f4L, 28-135 Kit lens, 2-580EXii
_______________
My Flickr http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gtbowman (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jun 04, 2010 08:40 |  #8

I'd go for the 4" filters and Singh Ray or Lee. Lee holder rather than the Cokin Z holder. But right now a lot of Lee stuff seems to be back-ordered everywhere.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
georgebowman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,510 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: Verona, WI
     
Jun 04, 2010 13:26 |  #9

Jon wrote in post #10301241 (external link)
I'd go for the 4" filters and Singh Ray or Lee. Lee holder rather than the Cokin Z holder. But right now a lot of Lee stuff seems to be back-ordered everywhere.

Thanks Jon! I'll go for the 4" Singh Ray and Lee holder. I can always hold the filters if the Lee holder is back-order. Thanks again.


My Gear: 7d, XTi, 17-55f2.8 EF-S, 70-200f4L, 28-135 Kit lens, 2-580EXii
_______________
My Flickr http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gtbowman (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wintermutant
Member
54 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:28 |  #10

Jon wrote in post #10301241 (external link)
I'd go for the 4" filters and Singh Ray or Lee. Lee holder rather than the Cokin Z holder. But right now a lot of Lee stuff seems to be back-ordered everywhere.

yes, i was even joking with andrea from 2filter that between the BP oilpocalypse and Lee i'm done with british companies for a while...i've been trying to get a 77mm wide angle adapter ring for the lee foundation kit holder with zero luck for over a month now...


old school 5D Mk I, 24-105L, 100 f/2.8L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DANATTHEROCK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:37 |  #11

georgebowman wrote in post #10302771 (external link)
Thanks Jon! I'll go for the 4" Singh Ray and Lee holder. I can always hold the filters if the Lee holder is back-order. Thanks again.

Absolutely. That is my preferred method and it works great in most situations. I have a holder I use 10% of the time. I have the Singh Ray Galen Rowell 3 stop soft and love it. Wonderful quality and performance. You can order directly from Singh Ray. Top shelf product.

As for the polarizer, the Hoya Pro1D and Hoya HD are very nice. I have both and bought one from 2filter's website at a great savings compared to B&H. Good company to deal with when buying filters.


Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
georgebowman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,510 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: Verona, WI
     
Jun 07, 2010 09:49 |  #12

DANATTHEROCK wrote in post #10304304 (external link)
Absolutely. That is my preferred method and it works great in most situations. I have a holder I use 10% of the time. I have the Singh Ray Galen Rowell 3 stop soft and love it. Wonderful quality and performance. You can order directly from Singh Ray. Top shelf product.

As for the polarizer, the Hoya Pro1D and Hoya HD are very nice. I have both and bought one from 2filter's website at a great savings compared to B&H. Good company to deal with when buying filters.

Do you find the 3 stop Singh Ray is too much sometimes? Just wondering if I should start with the 2 stop or go directly to the 3 stop. I ams sure I'll buy more at some point. However, I need to budget now. Any advice?


My Gear: 7d, XTi, 17-55f2.8 EF-S, 70-200f4L, 28-135 Kit lens, 2-580EXii
_______________
My Flickr http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gtbowman (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,910 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Curcular Polarizing filter
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2742 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.