Just picked this lens up. Looks like it might need a trip to CPS to get calibrated. What do you think?
100% 1.4
100% 5.6
kinda need f/2.2 to f/1.4 to be a bit more usable imo.
Any input?
Down_Shift Goldmember 1,316 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2006 More info | May 29, 2010 20:05 | #1 Just picked this lens up. Looks like it might need a trip to CPS to get calibrated. What do you think? 100% 5.6 kinda need f/2.2 to f/1.4 to be a bit more usable imo. Any input?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Combatmedic870 Goldmember 1,739 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Salem ,OR More info | May 29, 2010 20:38 | #2 It does look soft, but some ...different types of samples would be more helpful. Most likely send it in though. Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop More info | May 29, 2010 21:53 | #3 What camera you shooting with? Try MFA if you've got it? Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gsspirit Member 116 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Colorado Springs, CO. More info | It looks soft to me too but image #2 looks noisy can you post some with better light on the subject. 5DII, 5Dc, 24-70L, 35L, 70-200L IS mkII and some lighting gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denoir Goldmember 1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | May 29, 2010 22:04 | #5 The 35L is soft wide open. There are basically no fast primes that are really sharp at f/1.4. It is however difficult to judge from that shot if it falls under normal softness or if there is actually something wrong. Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2010 22:48 | #6 They were shot with a 5dmkii.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | May 29, 2010 22:54 | #7 denoir wrote in post #10269242 The 35L is soft wide open. There are basically no fast primes that are really sharp at f/1.4. It is however difficult to judge from that shot if it falls under normal softness or if there is actually something wrong. I disagree.. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | May 29, 2010 22:57 | #8 I love dachshunds. Get the gear on a tripod and be sure it's/not AF. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stargazer78 Member 183 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | May 29, 2010 23:33 | #9 Your 35L sample is not sharp because it is clearly out of focus. Try calibrating it through the micro adjustment feature of your 5D2. If it doesn't work, send it to Canon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2010 23:54 | #10 It looked focused in the viewfinder. I even moved the focusing ring a little both ways to see if that was the case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Try manually focusing your 35L at full aperture.. Mounting your kit on a tripod is advisable.. The only way to test lens sharpness is by manually focusing.. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2010 01:04 | #12 Just did mf with and without live view. Still comes out blurry. I had the camera set on my desk.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stargazer78 Member 183 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | May 30, 2010 01:43 | #13 Down_Shift wrote in post #10269569 It looked focused in the viewfinder. I even moved the focusing ring a little both ways to see if that was the case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mihow Member 221 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Oceanside California ( Southern California ) More info | May 30, 2010 03:23 | #14 i think its horrible and u should switch me for my 30mm asap 8) MIKE'S GEAR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JayStar86 Goldmember 3,531 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: VanCity, BC More info | May 30, 2010 03:47 | #15 stargazer78 wrote in post #10269789 Unless you have a Eg-S or split-prism focusing screen, it's unlikely you'd be able to focus an f/1.4 lens manually through the viewfinder. The stock focusing screen on a 5D2 isn't capable of representing accurate DoF for any aperture larger than f2.8. Also, when you manually focus through Live View, make sure you're doing it at x10 magnification level. My 35L is ridiculously sharp in the center @ f1.4. whats the deal with these eg-s focussing screens i keep hearing about. are they really that much better? ---Jay---
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1222 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||