Took these yesterday (Monday).
M.Powell Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Alabama More info | Jun 01, 2010 02:37 | #1 Took these yesterday (Monday).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop  13,360 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1836 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Jun 01, 2010 08:16 | #2 #3 is the best in this series. Nice and sharp, well exposed and composed and a nice and quiet bokeh. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Number three is by far the best of the lot. One & two look a bit flat on my monitor, and four just doesn't do a thing for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | First three I really like, your composition and lighting is wonderful. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 01, 2010 15:12 | #5 vk2gwk wrote in post #10281303  #3 is the best in this series. Nice and sharp, well exposed and composed and a nice and quiet bokeh. The first two are lacking some "brilliance" and because of the way you shot the flowers there are unsharp elements (like the front petals) that spoil the image. #4 is not really very interesting. Keep shooting! (and try to get to grips with depth of field). DOF I still have not figured out
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Photo_Joe Member  75 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Jun 01, 2010 16:55 | #6 Title is 3 for C&C, but there are 4 pictures posted? Equipment:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember  2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Jun 01, 2010 18:06 | #7 First seems to have colour saturation off the scale. The second shows that the flower is past its enjoy by date and just looks plain ugly. The third is probably the best. I would, however, have liked to see the stem lighter. Bonus no4 is probably a little too dark for most people but I like it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop 13,360 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1836 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Jun 02, 2010 00:58 | #8 M.Powell wrote in post #10283485 DOF I still have not figured out  Any advice you could offer would be tremendously appreciated... thanks!There are plenty of tutorials on the internet about "depth of field" - also in the stickies on this forum. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks everyone
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenaturephotographer Senior Member  347 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Southwest Michigan More info | Jun 02, 2010 17:21 | #11 #1, i'd zoom in until the middle left OOF petal is half cut off in the lower left corner, focusing on the stamens of the flower. http://www.flickr.com/photos/zdorj
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2098 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
